INGM vs CDW vs PLUS Stock Comparison

Ingram Micro Holding, Cdw and Eplus Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CLMB) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
INGM Ingram Micro Holding Corp
$28.27 +4.7% 1M +27.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.55B
P/E
15.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$55.98B
Div. yield
0.01%
Technology Distribution Technology
3 wins
CDW CDW Corp
$161.41 +19.2% 1M +1.4% 1Y
Market cap
$20.58B
P/E
19.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$23.50B
Div. yield
0.02%
Technology Distribution Technology
3 wins
PLUS Eplus Inc
$95.81 +5.9% 1M +29.4% 1Y
Market cap
$2.46B
P/E
17.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.52B
Div. yield
–
Technology Distribution Technology
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Eplus leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Eplus 6, Cdw 3, Ingram Micro Holding 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINGMCDWPLUSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.55B $20.58B $2.46B CDW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 15.2x 19.1x 17.3x INGM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 8.7x 13.8x 17.9x INGM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +11.5% +7.4% +16.2% PLUS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.8% 4.6% 5.7% PLUS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.2% 15.2% — CDW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 2.8x — INGM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.02% 0.00% CDW
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +27.9% +1.4% +29.4% PLUS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -2.8%/yr +11.7%/yr PLUS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.0% 47.7% 33.1% PLUS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 40/100 52/100 PLUS

Percentile Scorecard

INGMCDWPLUS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINGMCDWPLUS
Valuation 65 #18 of 50 22 #39 of 50 35 #33 of 50
Growth 86 #7 of 45 25 #34 of 45 57 #20 of 45
Profitability 30 #29 of 41 73 #12 of 41 60 #17 of 41
Financial Health 28 #45 of 62 12 #55 of 62 69 #20 of 62
Shareholder Returns 38 #19 of 30 69 #10 of 30 41 #18 of 30
Overall 50 40 52
  • INGM ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • CDW ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services
  • PLUS ranked among 66 companies in Technology Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINGMCDWPLUSSPY
1 month +4.7%+19.2%+5.9% -0.2%
3 months -6.0%+12.1%+3.5% +3.9%
6 months -4.8%+21.4%+14.5% +8.2%
Year to date +32.5%+18.5%+9.2% +12.9%
1 year +27.9%+1.4%+29.4% +12.3%
3 years —-18.8%+57.3% +87.4%
3 years, per year —-6.7%+16.3% +23.3%
5 years —-13.2%+74.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-2.8%+11.7% +10.9%
10 years —+260.5%+323.7% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+13.7%+15.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureINGMCDWPLUSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.0%47.7%33.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 46.7%52.0%29.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.250.720.81 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.630.030.89 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.8%-61.5%-46.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -10.7%-2.2%-1.3% -1.2%
52-week high $31.64$165.11$97.05 $779.14
52-week low $19.51$99.30$71.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINGMCDWPLUS
P/E now vs peer median 15.2xmedian 17.4x 19.0xmedian 17.4x 17.4xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.1xmedian 0.7x 0.9xmedian 0.7x 1.0xmedian 0.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 8.0xmedian 10.7x 13.0xmedian 10.7x 10.2xmedian 10.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -28.7xmedian 11.5x 23.5xmedian 11.5x 41.4xmedian 11.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.4x 8.3xmedian 1.4x 2.3xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.51 8.22median 1.51 4.69median 1.51

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINGMCDWPLUS
Revenue $55.98B $23.50B $2.52B
Gross profit $3.72B $5.02B $625.78M
Operating income $992.13M $1.68B $174.07M
Net income $430.60M $1.08B $142.77M
Free cash flow -$231.59M $860.20M $60.59M
EPS (diluted) $1.85 $8.48 $5.48
Cash & equivalents $808.97M $361.80M $448.85M
Total debt $3.80B $5.82B –
Shares (diluted) 232.23M 127.40M 26.06M
Enterprise value $2.15B $18.57B $875.91M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINGMCDWPLUS
P/E 15.2x 19.0x 17.4x
P/FCF -28.7x 23.5x 41.4x
P/Operating cash flow -68.9x 20.6x 38.5x
P/S 0.1x 0.9x 1.0x
P/B 1.6x 8.3x 2.3x
P/Tangible book 1.8x 15.0x 2.5x
EV/EBITDA 8.0x 13.0x 10.2x
EV/EBIT 9.7x 15.3x 11.8x
EV/Revenue 0.2x 1.1x 0.8x
EV/FCF -41.6x 29.9x 33.9x
EV/Operating cash flow -99.8x 26.2x 31.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 8.22 4.69

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINGMCDWPLUS
Revenue growth (1Y) 11.5% 7.4% 16.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 1.6% 4.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.9% 6.4% 17.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 2.3% 4.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.4% 0.4% 47.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 0.0% -1.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 61.2% 0.3% 15.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 0.1% 2.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 63.1% 4.3% 15.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 2.3% 3.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 79.3% -13.2% -39.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -5.6% -0.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 61.7% -15.6% -40.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -5.9% 3.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINGMCDWPLUS
Gross margin 6.6% 21.4% 24.9%
EBITDA margin 2.1% 8.4% 8.0%
Operating margin 1.8% 7.1% 6.9%
Pretax margin 1.2% 6.2% 7.4%
Net margin 0.8% 4.6% 5.7%
FCF margin -0.4% 3.7% 2.4%
Operating cash flow margin -0.2% 4.2% 2.6%
Return on equity 10.2% 43.2% 13.3%
Return on assets 2.0% 6.4% 7.8%
Return on invested capital 8.2% 15.2% –
Return on capital employed 14.0% 19.6% 15.4%
Asset turnover 2.6x 1.4x 1.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -0.2x 0.9x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue 0.1% 0.4% 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINGMCDWPLUS
Debt / assets 17.6% 33.7% –
Debt / equity 0.9x 2.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 2.8x –
Debt / FCF -16.4x 6.8x –
Liabilities / assets 80.1% 85.8% 42.6%
Equity / assets 19.9% 14.2% 57.4%
Interest coverage 3.3x – –
Current ratio 1.3x 1.2x 2.1x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.3x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.0x 0.6x
Altman Z-score 3.34 2.48 4.79

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINGMCDWPLUS
Dividend yield 1.2% 1.6% 1.1%
Net buyback yield 1.6% 4.1% 2.0%
Shareholder yield 2.7% 5.7% 3.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) 17.6% 30.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) -32.8% 37.7% –
Dividend growth (1Y) 85.9% -2.0% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 1.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINGMCDWPLUS
Forward P/E 8.7xFY2026 13.8xFY2026 17.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.25FY2026 $11.73FY2026 $5.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +12.1%FY2026 +17.1%FY2026 -0.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.2% +7.4% +18.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $55.78BFY2026 $22.80BFY2026 $2.62BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.1%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026 +7.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.1% +4.2% -2.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINGMCDWPLUS
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 96.2%
Institutions holding 228 752 288
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.0% +7.2% -1.0%
Institutions buying 165 370 149
Institutions selling 44 295 97
Buyers to sellers 3.75 1.25 1.54

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INGMCDWPLUS
INGM 1.00 0.39 0.34
CDW 0.39 1.00 0.36
PLUS 0.34 0.36 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, INGM, CDW and PLUS?

Cdw (CDW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) $6.55B, Cdw (CDW) $20.58B, Eplus (PLUS) $2.46B.

Which stock is cheaper, INGM, CDW and PLUS?

Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 15.2x, Cdw (CDW) 19.1x, Eplus (PLUS) 17.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) is cheapest (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.7x, Cdw (CDW) 13.8x, Eplus (PLUS) 17.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Eplus (PLUS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +11.5%, Cdw (CDW) +7.4%, Eplus (PLUS) +16.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

Eplus (PLUS) has the highest net margin (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.8%, Cdw (CDW) 4.6%, Eplus (PLUS) 5.7%). On return on invested capital, Cdw (CDW) leads (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 8.2%, Cdw (CDW) 15.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Eplus (PLUS) returned the most: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) +27.9%, Cdw (CDW) +1.4%, Eplus (PLUS) +29.4%. Over five years, Eplus (PLUS) compounded fastest (Cdw (CDW) -2.8%/yr, Eplus (PLUS) +11.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Cdw (CDW) has the highest dividend yield: Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 0.01%, Cdw (CDW) 0.02%, Eplus (PLUS) 0.00%. Eplus (PLUS) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Eplus (PLUS) has been the steadiest (Ingram Micro Holding (INGM) 44.0%, Cdw (CDW) 47.7%, Eplus (PLUS) 33.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, INGM, CDW and PLUS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Eplus (PLUS) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.