ING vs MUFG vs WFC Stock Comparison

Ing Groep, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ING Ing Groep Nv
$32.87 -5.5% 1M +30.5% 1Y
Market cap
$96.36B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Money Center Banks Financial Services
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$87.44 +7.4% 1M +0.4% 1Y
Market cap
$257.14B
P/E
11.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
0.02%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Wells Fargo & Company leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Wells Fargo & Company 7, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionINGMUFGWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $96.36B $241.79B $257.14B WFC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only — 16.0x 11.7x WFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.3x 12.9x 11.2x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — -12.0% +5.4% WFC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 47.7% 25.2% MUFG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 3.7% 15.1% WFC
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.5% +45.9% +0.4% MUFG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +16.5%/yr +31.3%/yr +11.6%/yr MUFG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.1% 26.6% 25.9% WFC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 35/100 46/100 WFC

Percentile Scorecard

INGMUFGWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisINGMUFGWFC
Valuation – 23 #276 of 360 38 #223 of 360
Growth – 74 #91 of 344 51 #169 of 344
Profitability – 62 #131 of 345 54 #161 of 345
Financial Health 21 #269 of 339 4 #326 of 339 6 #318 of 339
Shareholder Returns 94 #22 of 352 10 #316 of 352 79 #75 of 352
Overall – 35 46
  • ING ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • MUFG ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodINGMUFGWFCSPY
1 month -5.5%-4.4%+7.4% -1.0%
3 months -8.5%-2.0%-1.9% -0.4%
6 months +9.7%+19.5%+8.7% +4.5%
Year to date +17.4%+38.6%-6.2% +12.4%
1 year +30.5%+45.9%+0.4% +13.6%
3 years +147.9%+150.1%+110.1% +76.4%
3 years, per year +35.4%+35.8%+28.1% +20.8%
5 years +114.8%+290.4%+73.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year +16.5%+31.3%+11.6% +10.4%
10 years +150.5%+342.3%+96.1% +267.7%
10 years, per year +9.6%+16.0%+7.0% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureINGMUFGWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.1%26.6%25.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.0%26.6%29.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.450.950.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.081.720.01 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -47.4%-35.6%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.8%-8.9%-9.3% -1.6%
52-week high $37.26$24.14$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $24.37$14.88$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleINGMUFGWFC
P/E now vs peer median —median 12.7x 16.6xmedian 12.7x 12.0xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.5x 8.2xmedian 3.5x 3.0xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 4.9x —median 4.9x 6.2xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.0x —median 11.0x 9.1xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.3x 2.4xmedian 1.3x 1.5xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.33 0.28median 1.33 0.83median 1.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsINGMUFGWFC
Revenue – $31.62B $87.23B
Gross profit – $29.85B –
Operating income – $18.02B –
Net income – $13.97B $22.97B
Free cash flow – – $28.91B
EPS (diluted) – $1.32 $7.20
Cash & equivalents $74.19B – –
Total debt $21.78B $112.96B $221.04B
Shares (diluted) 2.99B 11.40B 3.05B
Enterprise value -$447.09B -$99.60B $257.14B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricINGMUFGWFC
P/E – 16.6x 12.0x
P/FCF – – 9.1x
P/Operating cash flow – – 9.1x
P/S – 8.2x 3.0x
P/B 1.5x 2.4x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 2.4x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA – – 6.2x
EV/EBIT – 5.1x 6.8x
EV/Revenue – 2.9x 5.5x
EV/FCF – – 16.7x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 16.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.28 0.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricINGMUFGWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) – -12.0% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -2.4% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 38.8% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) – 24.8% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 12.7% –
Net income growth (1Y) – 62.6% 9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 32.4% 6.8%
EPS growth (1Y) – 104.8% 16.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 59.4% 14.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 303.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -0.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 303.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -0.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricINGMUFGWFC
Gross margin – 94.4% –
EBITDA margin – – 89.8%
Operating margin – 57.0% –
Pretax margin – 59.6% 31.7%
Net margin – 47.7% 25.2%
FCF margin – – 33.1%
Operating cash flow margin – – 33.1%
Return on equity – 11.7% 12.9%
Return on assets – 0.5% 1.0%
Return on invested capital – 3.7% 15.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricINGMUFGWFC
Debt / assets 1.6% 4.2% 9.8%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.0x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.8x
Debt / FCF – – 7.6x
Liabilities / assets 95.3% 96.0% 92.1%
Equity / assets 4.7% 4.0% 7.9%
Interest coverage – 0.6x 1.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricINGMUFGWFC
Dividend yield 4.6% 1.4% 2.1%
Net buyback yield – – 5.3%
Shareholder yield 4.6% 1.4% 7.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 24.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 19.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 5.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 6.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusINGMUFGWFC
Forward P/E 12.3xFY2026 12.9xFY2026 11.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.68FY2026 $1.71FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +5.9%FY2026 +27.6%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +18.3% +0.6% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $27.20BFY2026 $44.38BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.0%FY2026 +18.6%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +3.2% +4.0% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersINGMUFGWFC
Held by institutions 4.5% 3.0% 76.8%
Institutions holding 591 576 2,881
Change in shares held, QoQ -19.0% -0.1% +1.1%
Institutions buying 320 325 1,293
Institutions selling 155 161 1,136
Buyers to sellers 2.06 2.02 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

INGMUFGWFC
ING 1.00 0.58 0.43
MUFG 0.58 1.00 0.32
WFC 0.43 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ING, MUFG and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ing Groep (ING) $96.36B, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) $241.79B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $257.14B.

Which stock is cheaper, ING, MUFG and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 16.0x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 11.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (Ing Groep (ING) 12.3x, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 12.9x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 11.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) -12.0%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) has the highest net margin (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 47.7%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.2%). On return on invested capital, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads (Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 3.7%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 15.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) returned the most: Ing Groep (ING) +30.5%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +45.9%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +0.4%. Over five years, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) compounded fastest (Ing Groep (ING) +16.5%/yr, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) +31.3%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ing Groep (ING) 0.00%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 0.00%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 0.02%. Ing Groep (ING) and Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has been the steadiest (Ing Groep (ING) 28.1%, Mitsubishi Ufj Financial (MUFG) 26.6%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ING, MUFG and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.