IMO vs PSX vs TTE Stock Comparison

Imperial Oil, Phillips 66 and TotalEnergies SE Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SU) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
IMO Imperial Oil Ltd
$134.72 +8.1% 1M +49.8% 1Y
Market cap
$65.02B
P/E
21.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$37.53B
Div. yield
0.02%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
1 win
PSX Phillips 66
$283.13 +10.4% 1M +108.5% 1Y
Market cap
$115.51B
P/E
16.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$156.36B
Div. yield
0.02%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
4 wins
TTE TotalEnergies SE
$92.81 +1.2% 1M +48.3% 1Y
Market cap
$205.28B
P/E
18.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$115.93B
Div. yield
0.04%
Integrated Oil and Gas Energy
7 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

TotalEnergies SE leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (TotalEnergies SE 7, Phillips 66 4, Imperial Oil 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIMOPSXTTELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $65.02B $115.51B $205.28B TTE
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 21.6x 16.3x 18.3x PSX
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.6x 8.8x 8.1x TTE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.5% +15.5% +13.8% PSX
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 8.0% 4.5% 9.7% TTE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.4% -181.5% 22.6% TTE
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -0.1x 0.5x PSX
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.02% 0.02% 0.04% TTE
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +49.8% +108.5% +48.3% PSX
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +31.0%/yr +27.9%/yr +12.7%/yr IMO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 28.7% 31.9% 24.8% TTE
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 42/100 71/100 TTE

Percentile Scorecard

IMOPSXTTE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIMOPSXTTE
Valuation 32 #68 of 99 29 #71 of 99 85 #16 of 99
Growth 55 #44 of 97 85 #15 of 97 67 #33 of 97
Profitability 64 #35 of 96 28 #69 of 96 79 #21 of 96
Financial Health 82 #19 of 102 23 #79 of 102 53 #49 of 102
Shareholder Returns 83 #14 of 76 43 #44 of 76 72 #22 of 76
Overall 63 42 71
  • IMO ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • PSX ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • TTE ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIMOPSXTTESPY
1 month +8.1%+10.4%+1.2% -1.0%
3 months +4.9%+36.9%+6.9% +2.9%
6 months +8.3%+73.9%+3.4% +6.4%
Year to date +56.1%+119.4%+41.9% +11.4%
1 year +49.8%+108.5%+48.3% +13.1%
3 years +132.7%+153.0%+42.3% +79.4%
3 years, per year +32.5%+36.3%+12.5% +21.5%
5 years +285.8%+241.6%+81.4% +67.7%
5 years, per year +31.0%+27.9%+12.7% +10.9%
10 years +311.5%+252.4%+92.2% +255.2%
10 years, per year +15.2%+13.4%+6.8% +13.5%

Risk

MeasureIMOPSXTTESPY
Volatility, 1Y 28.7%31.9%24.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 30.7%28.9%24.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -0.10-0.35-0.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.733.401.94 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -30.1%-46.2%-28.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.6%-4.7%-0.8% -2.5%
52-week high $138.33$297.20$93.60 $779.14
52-week low $83.72$127.75$60.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIMOPSXTTE
P/E now vs peer median 21.6xmedian 13.1x 16.0xmedian 13.1x 18.1xmedian 13.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 2.0x 0.7xmedian 2.0x 1.8xmedian 2.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.3xmedian 5.7x -1.1xmedian 5.7x 3.4xmedian 5.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 17.9xmedian 11.1x 17.7xmedian 11.1x 6.4xmedian 11.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 1.5x 3.5xmedian 1.5x 1.6xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -4.24median 2.24 -1.64median 2.24 -1.56median 2.24

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIMOPSXTTE
Revenue $37.53B $156.36B $115.93B
Gross profit – $24.12B $115.93B
Operating income – -$123.35B $54.64B
Net income $3.01B $7.19B $18.10B
Free cash flow $3.64B $6.39B $32.15B
R&D $6.51M – $228.00M
EPS (diluted) $6.21 $17.62 $4.37
Cash & equivalents $2.00B $4.10B $27.68B
Total debt $11.46B $20.57B $259.58B
Shares (diluted) 484.90M 402.62M 2.57B
Enterprise value $60.11B $103.30B $85.86B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIMOPSXTTE
P/E 21.6x 16.0x 18.1x
P/FCF 17.9x 17.7x 6.4x
P/Operating cash flow 12.6x 12.7x 6.2x
P/S 1.7x 0.7x 1.8x
P/B 3.8x 3.5x 1.6x
P/Tangible book 3.8x 3.6x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 11.3x -1.1x 3.4x
EV/EBIT 16.7x -1.0x 4.3x
EV/Revenue 1.8x 0.8x 2.0x
EV/FCF 18.1x 20.2x 7.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 12.7x 14.5x 7.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.24 -1.64 -1.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIMOPSXTTE
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.5% 15.5% 13.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -2.2% -0.9% -14.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 53.5% 13.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -3.4% 2.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) – -5.0% 13.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -1.2% 0.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -10.5% 293.4% 38.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -10.9% -14.1% -3.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -5.8% 318.3% 72.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -5.1% -9.8% -11.6%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 15.5% 165.5% 17.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.0% -3.9% -5.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 13.2% 329.7% 19.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.2% -7.1% -4.4%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIMOPSXTTE
Gross margin – 15.4% 100.0%
EBITDA margin 15.6% -77.1% 59.8%
Operating margin – -78.9% 47.1%
Pretax margin 10.5% 5.7% 28.9%
Net margin 8.0% 4.5% 9.7%
FCF margin 9.7% 4.1% 27.7%
Operating cash flow margin 13.8% 5.7% 28.5%
Return on equity 17.9% 23.1% 8.9%
Return on assets 9.1% 8.7% 3.6%
Return on invested capital 15.4% -181.5% 22.6%
Return on capital employed 15.2% -191.0% 25.4%
Asset turnover 1.1x 1.9x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.7x 1.2x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIMOPSXTTE
Debt / assets 8.3% 25.1% 20.1%
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 0.1x -0.1x 0.5x
Debt / FCF 0.8x 3.2x 2.0x
Liabilities / assets 48.7% 60.0% 58.3%
Equity / assets 51.3% 40.0% 41.7%
Interest coverage 147.4x -106.9x 23,923,370x
Current ratio 1.4x 1.3x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 0.9x 0.5x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x 0.3x
Altman Z-score 4.67 -0.98 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIMOPSXTTE
Dividend yield 2.3% 1.8% 5.6%
Net buyback yield 3.6% 0.9% 0.5%
Shareholder yield 5.9% 2.7% 6.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 36.0% 27.6% 44.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) 29.8% 31.0% 24.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) 15.1% 4.1% 6.1%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 14.8% 1.8% 2.3%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIMOPSXTTE
Forward P/E 12.6xFY2026 8.8xFY2026 8.1xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $10.67FY2026 $32.27FY2026 $11.44FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +71.8%FY2026 +401.1%FY2026 +66.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +6.6% -1.4% -8.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $45.71BFY2026 $165.58BFY2026 $203.54BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +33.3%FY2026 +21.7%FY2026 +11.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -8.7% -4.7% +3.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIMOPSXTTE
Held by institutions 26.7% 78.8% 46.3%
Institutions holding 413 2,102 1,002
Change in shares held, QoQ +6.1% +1.3% +3.8%
Institutions buying 185 967 457
Institutions selling 141 729 354
Buyers to sellers 1.31 1.33 1.29

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IMOPSXTTE
IMO 1.00 0.52 0.54
PSX 0.52 1.00 0.35
TTE 0.54 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IMO, PSX and TTE?

TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the largest by market capitalisation: Imperial Oil (IMO) $65.02B, Phillips 66 (PSX) $115.51B, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) $205.28B.

Which stock is cheaper, IMO, PSX and TTE?

Phillips 66 (PSX) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Imperial Oil (IMO) 21.6x, Phillips 66 (PSX) 16.3x, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 18.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is cheapest (Imperial Oil (IMO) 12.6x, Phillips 66 (PSX) 8.8x, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 8.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Phillips 66 (PSX) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Imperial Oil (IMO) +5.5%, Phillips 66 (PSX) +15.5%, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) +13.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

TotalEnergies SE (TTE) has the highest net margin (Imperial Oil (IMO) 8.0%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 4.5%, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 9.7%). On return on invested capital, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) leads (Imperial Oil (IMO) 15.4%, Phillips 66 (PSX) -181.5%, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 22.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Phillips 66 (PSX) returned the most: Imperial Oil (IMO) +49.8%, Phillips 66 (PSX) +108.5%, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) +48.3%. Over five years, Imperial Oil (IMO) compounded fastest (Imperial Oil (IMO) +31.0%/yr, Phillips 66 (PSX) +27.9%/yr, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) +12.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

TotalEnergies SE (TTE) has the highest dividend yield: Imperial Oil (IMO) 0.02%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 0.02%, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 0.04%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) has been the steadiest (Imperial Oil (IMO) 28.7%, Phillips 66 (PSX) 31.9%, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) 24.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IMO, PSX and TTE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.