IIIV vs KHOBF vs MNDO Stock Comparison

i3 Verticals, Kheoba and Mind Cti Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
IIIV i3 Verticals, Inc.
$17.31 +23.8% 1M -45.5% 1Y
Market cap
$340.14M
P/E
39.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$218.16M
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
4 wins
KHOBF KHEOBA Ltd
$2.50 0.0% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$20.23M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
2 wins
MNDO Mind Cti Ltd
$0.88 -12.0% 1M -19.3% 1Y
Market cap
$18.11M
P/E
5.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$19.41M
Div. yield
–
ERP Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

i3 Verticals leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (i3 Verticals 4, Mind Cti 2, Kheoba 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionIIIVKHOBFMNDOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $340.14M $20.23M $18.11M IIIV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.9x — 5.5x MNDO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 17.3x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +4.1% — -3.7% IIIV
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.9% — 16.9% MNDO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 0.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.1x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -45.5% 0.0% -19.3% KHOBF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -5.0%/yr — -23.4%/yr IIIV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 45.8% 0.0% 38.8% KHOBF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 — 58/100 IIIV

Percentile Scorecard

IIIVKHOBFMNDO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisIIIVKHOBFMNDO
Valuation 87 #14 of 101 – 100 #1 of 101
Growth 54 #45 of 97 – 16 #82 of 97
Profitability 60 #38 of 93 – 69 #30 of 93
Financial Health 52 #52 of 108 81 #21 of 108 94 #8 of 108
Shareholder Returns 100 #1 of 63 – 11 #56 of 63
Overall 71 – 58
  • IIIV ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • KHOBF ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • MNDO ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodIIIVKHOBFMNDOSPY
1 month +23.8%0.0%-12.0% +0.7%
3 months -17.6%0.0%-13.7% +3.7%
6 months -23.2%0.0%-17.0% +7.1%
Year to date -31.3%0.0%-23.5% +12.8%
1 year -45.5%0.0%-19.3% +11.9%
3 years -4.6%—-52.4% +85.2%
3 years, per year -1.6%—-22.0% +22.8%
5 years -22.7%—-73.6% +67.6%
5 years, per year -5.0%—-23.4% +10.9%
10 years ——-60.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year ——-8.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureIIIVKHOBFMNDOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 45.8%0.0%38.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.3%—43.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.280.000.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.99—-0.50 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -58.3%-37.5%-73.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -45.5%0.0%-30.2% -1.2%
52-week high $31.78$2.50$1.26 $779.14
52-week low $13.82$2.50$0.88 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleIIIVKHOBFMNDO
P/E now vs peer median 39.5xmedian 28.0x —median 28.0x 5.5xmedian 28.0x
P/S now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 2.8x —median 2.8x 0.9xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 16.0xmedian 16.9x —median 16.9x 1.3xmedian 16.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 9.2xmedian 15.9x —median 15.9x 5.7xmedian 15.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 3.2x 122.0xmedian 3.2x 0.7xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.85median 0.89 —median 0.89 -0.40median 0.89

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsIIIVKHOBFMNDO
Revenue $218.16M – $19.41M
Gross profit – – $10.56M
Operating income $5.94M – $3.06M
Net income $11.89M – $3.27M
Free cash flow $49.93M – $3.13M
R&D – – $4.15M
EPS (diluted) $0.44 – $0.16
Cash & equivalents $2.65M $318.16K $3.08M
Total debt $114.28M – –
Shares (diluted) 19.54M 8.09M 20.63M
Enterprise value $226.15M $19.91M -$29.72M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricIIIVKHOBFMNDO
P/E 39.5x – 5.5x
P/FCF 9.2x – 5.7x
P/Operating cash flow 8.8x – 5.8x
P/S 2.1x – 0.9x
P/B 1.2x 122.0x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 1.2x 125.8x 0.8x
EV/EBITDA 16.0x – 1.3x
EV/EBIT 96.4x – 1.5x
EV/Revenue 2.6x – 0.2x
EV/FCF 11.5x – 1.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 10.9x – 1.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.85 – -0.40

Growth

14 metrics
MetricIIIVKHOBFMNDO
Revenue growth (1Y) 4.1% – -3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 4.3% – -3.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 7.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -1.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.9% – 13.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 32.5% – -14.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -91.5% – 4.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 47.6% – -13.8%
EPS growth (1Y) -88.9% – 4.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 46.5% – -13.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 662.8% – 8.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.2% – -13.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 935.6% – 8.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.1% – -14.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricIIIVKHOBFMNDO
Gross margin – – 54.4%
EBITDA margin 16.4% – 17.1%
Operating margin 2.7% – 15.8%
Pretax margin 6.9% – 18.3%
Net margin 3.9% – 16.9%
FCF margin 22.9% – 16.1%
Operating cash flow margin 24.0% – 16.0%
Return on equity 3.1% – 13.7%
Return on assets 2.1% – 10.8%
Return on invested capital 0.8% – –
Return on capital employed 1.0% – 11.4%
Asset turnover 0.3x – 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 4.4x – 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 8.3% – 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricIIIVKHOBFMNDO
Debt / assets 18.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.3x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.1x – –
Debt / FCF 2.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 36.1% 49.8% 19.9%
Equity / assets 63.9% 50.2% 80.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.2x 2.0x 4.7x
Quick ratio 1.0x 2.0x 4.6x
Cash ratio 0.1x 1.9x 3.8x
Altman Z-score 1.90 – 3.22

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricIIIVKHOBFMNDO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 29.6% – -3.7%
Shareholder yield 29.6% – -3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusIIIVKHOBFMNDO
Forward P/E 17.3xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $1.00FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY -4.8%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +17.0% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $211.26MFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY -0.9%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after +11.9% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersIIIVKHOBFMNDO
Held by institutions 100.0% – 8.0%
Institutions holding 134 – 16
Change in shares held, QoQ -12.0% – -1.3%
Institutions buying 57 – 6
Institutions selling 60 – 6
Buyers to sellers 0.95 – 1.00

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

IIIVKHOBFMNDO
IIIV 1.00 – 0.09
KHOBF – – –
MNDO 0.09 – 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, IIIV, KHOBF and MNDO?

i3 Verticals (IIIV) is the largest by market capitalisation: i3 Verticals (IIIV) $340.14M, Kheoba (KHOBF) $20.23M, Mind Cti (MNDO) $18.11M.

Which stock is cheaper, IIIV, KHOBF and MNDO?

Mind Cti (MNDO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (i3 Verticals (IIIV) 39.9x, Mind Cti (MNDO) 5.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

i3 Verticals (IIIV) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: i3 Verticals (IIIV) +4.1%, Mind Cti (MNDO) -3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mind Cti (MNDO) has the highest net margin (i3 Verticals (IIIV) 3.9%, Mind Cti (MNDO) 16.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kheoba (KHOBF) returned the most: i3 Verticals (IIIV) -45.5%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Mind Cti (MNDO) -19.3%. Over five years, i3 Verticals (IIIV) compounded fastest (i3 Verticals (IIIV) -5.0%/yr, Mind Cti (MNDO) -23.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kheoba (KHOBF) has been the steadiest (i3 Verticals (IIIV) 45.8%, Kheoba (KHOBF) 0.0%, Mind Cti (MNDO) 38.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, IIIV, KHOBF and MNDO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, i3 Verticals (IIIV) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.