ICTSF vs RNGE vs RSKIA Stock Comparison

Icts International N V, Range Impact and George Risk Industries Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BCO) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
RNGE Range Impact, Inc.
$0.56 -27.3% 1M +250.0% 1Y
Market cap
$65.14M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Real Estate Operators Real Estate
2 wins

Head to Head

4 decided of 12

Range Impact leads on 2 of the 12 questions below (Range Impact 2, Icts International N V 1, George Risk Industries 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionICTSFRNGERSKIALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $167.33M $65.14M $101.44M ICTSF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -11.3x — 10.4x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +13.9% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — 37.9% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 6.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +2.8% +250.0% +27.3% RNGE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.9%/yr +13.3%/yr +9.3%/yr RNGE
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 82.0% 131.5% 24.9% RSKIA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — — 87/100 –

Percentile Scorecard

ICTSFRNGERSKIA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisICTSFRNGERSKIA
Valuation 37 #72 of 113 – 78 #26 of 113
Growth – – 88 #12 of 96
Profitability – – 87 #13 of 91
Financial Health 50 #61 of 122 – 98 #3 of 122
Shareholder Returns – – 85 #11 of 66
Overall – – 87
  • ICTSF ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • RNGE ranked among 42 companies in Property Developers
  • RSKIA ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodICTSFRNGERSKIASPY
1 month -12.4%-27.3%-4.6% +0.7%
3 months -25.5%-37.8%+10.3% +3.7%
6 months +2.8%+211.1%+11.6% +7.1%
Year to date +33.8%+273.3%+20.3% +12.8%
1 year +2.8%+250.0%+27.3% +11.9%
3 years +11.2%+250.0%+76.6% +85.2%
3 years, per year +3.6%+51.9%+20.9% +22.8%
5 years -40.7%+86.7%+55.9% +67.6%
5 years, per year -9.9%+13.3%+9.3% +10.9%
10 years +529.6%-60.8%+184.2% +262.0%
10 years, per year +20.2%-9.0%+11.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureICTSFRNGERSKIASPY
Volatility, 1Y 82.0%131.5%24.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 134.1%154.8%30.0% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.281.270.02 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.031.901.10 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.3%-73.0%-39.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -30.4%-41.7%-8.8% -1.2%
52-week high $6.42$0.96$22.75 $779.14
52-week low $3.10$0.13$16.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleICTSFRNGERSKIA
P/E now vs peer median -11.3xmedian 21.9x —median 8.7x 10.4xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.9x —median 4.7x 3.9xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 11.9x —median 12.5x 6.8xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -5.1xmedian 14.4x —median 6.2x 24.0xmedian 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median -7.9xmedian 2.4x —median 0.6x 1.6xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.97 —median 0.28 0.59median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsICTSFRNGERSKIA
Revenue – – $25.81M
Gross profit – – $12.15M
Operating income – – $7.06M
Net income – – $9.79M
Free cash flow – – $4.22M
EPS (diluted) – – $1.99
Cash & equivalents $16.89M – $6.84M
Total debt $25.53M – –
Shares (diluted) 36.18M 115.42M 4.91M
Enterprise value $54.77M $65.14M -$86.85M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricICTSFRNGERSKIA
P/E -11.3x – 10.4x
P/FCF -5.1x – 24.0x
P/Operating cash flow – – 22.7x
P/S 0.3x – 3.9x
P/B -7.9x – 1.6x
P/Tangible book -7.9x – 1.6x
EV/EBITDA – – 6.8x
EV/EBIT – – 7.2x
EV/Revenue – – 2.0x
EV/FCF – – 12.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 11.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.59

Growth

14 metrics
MetricICTSFRNGERSKIA
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 13.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – 9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 10.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – 10.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 12.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 13.9%
Net income growth (1Y) – – 19.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – 17.2%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 19.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 17.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 7.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 29.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 13.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 45.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricICTSFRNGERSKIA
Gross margin – – 47.1%
EBITDA margin – – 29.0%
Operating margin – – 27.4%
Pretax margin – – 50.9%
Net margin – – 37.9%
FCF margin – – 16.4%
Operating cash flow margin – – 17.3%
Return on equity – – 15.2%
Return on assets – – 13.4%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – 10.4%
Asset turnover – – 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricICTSFRNGERSKIA
Debt / assets 4.7% – –
Debt / equity -0.4x – –
Net debt / EBITDA – – –
Debt / FCF – – –
Liabilities / assets 112.8% – 11.9%
Equity / assets -12.8% – 88.1%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.8x – 14.6x
Quick ratio 1.6x – 11.2x
Cash ratio 0.6x – 10.3x
Altman Z-score – – 9.94

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricICTSFRNGERSKIA
Dividend yield – – 6.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – – 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusICTSFRNGERSKIA

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ICTSFRNGERSKIA
ICTSF 1.00 -0.16 -0.10
RNGE -0.16 1.00 0.02
RSKIA -0.10 0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ICTSF, RNGE and RSKIA?

Icts International N V (ICTSF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Icts International N V (ICTSF) $167.33M, Range Impact (RNGE) $65.14M, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) $101.44M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Range Impact (RNGE) returned the most: Icts International N V (ICTSF) +2.8%, Range Impact (RNGE) +250.0%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +27.3%. Over five years, Range Impact (RNGE) compounded fastest (Icts International N V (ICTSF) -9.9%/yr, Range Impact (RNGE) +13.3%/yr, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) +9.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Range Impact (RNGE) 0.00%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 6.02%. Icts International N V (ICTSF) and Range Impact (RNGE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) has been the steadiest (Icts International N V (ICTSF) 82.0%, Range Impact (RNGE) 131.5%, George Risk Industries (RSKIA) 24.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ICTSF, RNGE and RSKIA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Range Impact (RNGE) leads on 2. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.