ICCC vs ZTS vs BFLY Stock Comparison

Immucell, Zoetis and Butterfly Network Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ANIK) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
ICCC Immucell Corp /De/
$10.25 +5.1% 1M +65.1% 1Y
Market cap
$93.91M
P/E
119.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$30.68M
Div. yield
–
Animal Health Healthcare
3 wins
ZTS Zoetis Inc.
$82.97 +19.1% 1M -42.5% 1Y
Market cap
$36.86B
P/E
14.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$9.52B
Div. yield
0.02%
Animal Health Healthcare
5 wins
BFLY Butterfly Network, Inc.
$6.40 -28.3% 1M +119.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.78B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$123.25M
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Zoetis leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Zoetis 5, Immucell 3, Butterfly Network 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionICCCZTSBFLYLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $93.91M $36.86B $1.78B ZTS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 119.3x 14.1x -33.2x ZTS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.2x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.5% +1.5% +39.4% BFLY
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.6% 27.5% -43.6% ZTS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 9.2% 23.4% — ZTS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 1.8x — ICCC
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +65.1% -42.5% +119.9% BFLY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.2%/yr -17.6%/yr -9.4%/yr ICCC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 50.6% 40.9% 112.7% ZTS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 80/100 71/100 50/100 ICCC

Percentile Scorecard

ICCCZTSBFLY

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisICCCZTSBFLY
Valuation 90 #67 of 634 87 #82 of 634 29 #164 of 229
Growth 84 #98 of 607 51 #299 of 607 90 #24 of 221
Profitability 88 #66 of 557 96 #24 of 557 38 #130 of 209
Financial Health 60 #265 of 654 34 #431 of 654 57 #103 of 240
Shareholder Returns 79 #87 of 401 89 #46 of 401 36 #95 of 147
Overall 80 71 50
  • ICCC ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • ZTS ranked among 671 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BFLY ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodICCCZTSBFLYSPY
1 month +5.1%+19.1%-28.3% -2.0%
3 months -7.4%+9.2%-27.4% -2.2%
6 months +15.3%-26.3%+32.8% +4.2%
Year to date +66.7%-34.1%+68.4% +10.6%
1 year +65.1%-42.5%+119.9% +10.4%
3 years +98.3%-48.9%+471.4% +73.6%
3 years, per year +25.6%-20.0%+78.9% +20.2%
5 years +17.0%-61.9%-38.8% +61.6%
5 years, per year +3.2%-17.6%-9.4% +10.1%
10 years +103.4%+69.5%— +261.3%
10 years, per year +7.4%+5.4%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureICCCZTSBFLYSPY
Volatility, 1Y 50.6%40.9%112.7% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 47.8%49.4%94.2% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.390.483.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.29-1.041.06 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.0%-72.0%-93.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -12.5%-42.5%-35.6% -3.2%
52-week high $11.72$144.35$9.94 $779.14
52-week low $4.56$69.12$1.97 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleICCCZTSBFLY
P/E now vs peer median 118.0xmedian 18.4x 13.2xmedian 18.4x -31.2xmedian 28.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 9.0x 3.6xmedian 9.0x 12.8xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.6xmedian 16.0x 10.3xmedian 16.0x -28.5xmedian 18.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 22.1xmedian 21.8x 14.8xmedian 21.8x -57.1xmedian 24.8x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 2.1x 10.9xmedian 2.1x 8.5xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 4.17median 0.37 1.41median 0.37 -1.04median 0.95

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsICCCZTSBFLY
Revenue $30.68M $9.52B $123.25M
Gross profit $12.37M $6.81B $86.60M
Operating income $3.87M $3.59B -$57.83M
Net income $787.37K $2.62B -$53.69M
Free cash flow $4.21M $2.32B -$27.55M
R&D $1.89M $722.00M $39.57M
EPS (diluted) $0.09 $6.26 $-0.20
Cash & equivalents $8.86M $1.48B $122.30M
Total debt $8.30M $9.05B –
Shares (diluted) 9.19M 417.70M 262.10M
Enterprise value $70.55M $28.70B $1.25B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricICCCZTSBFLY
P/E 118.0x 13.2x -31.2x
P/FCF 22.1x 14.8x -57.1x
P/Operating cash flow 15.8x 12.1x -67.3x
P/S 3.0x 3.6x 12.8x
P/B 3.0x 10.9x 8.5x
P/Tangible book 3.0x 15.4x 8.8x
EV/EBITDA 14.6x 10.3x -28.5x
EV/EBIT 23.9x 11.6x -25.1x
EV/Revenue 3.0x 4.4x 11.8x
EV/FCF 22.0x 18.0x -52.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.7x 14.7x -62.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 4.17 1.41 -1.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricICCCZTSBFLY
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.5% 1.5% 39.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 25.1% 5.0% 21.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 16.8% 1.8% 126.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 43.5% 5.7% 30.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 123.0% -0.1% 33.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 38.6% 5.2% 26.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -55.3% 0.6% 32.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% 5.7% 24.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -56.1% 7.7% 35.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.3% 9.4% 30.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 132.6% -4.6% 5.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 43.9% 12.4% 41.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 138.9% 2.1% -0.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.6% 21.7% 38.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricICCCZTSBFLY
Gross margin 40.3% 71.5% 70.3%
EBITDA margin 20.7% 42.8% -41.4%
Operating margin 12.6% 37.7% -46.9%
Pretax margin 2.8% 34.4% -43.5%
Net margin 2.6% 27.5% -43.6%
FCF margin 13.7% 24.3% -22.4%
Operating cash flow margin 19.2% 29.8% -19.0%
Return on equity 2.6% 82.0% -28.7%
Return on assets 1.7% 17.3% -18.8%
Return on invested capital 9.2% 23.4% –
Return on capital employed 9.4% 27.5% -26.6%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.6x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 7.5x 1.1x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 1.8% 1.0% 20.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricICCCZTSBFLY
Debt / assets 17.8% 60.0% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 2.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA -0.1x 1.8x –
Debt / FCF 2.0x 3.9x –
Liabilities / assets 32.7% 79.1% 36.0%
Equity / assets 67.3% 20.9% 64.0%
Interest coverage 8.9x 15.1x -46.8x
Current ratio 4.8x 3.1x 3.6x
Quick ratio 2.7x 1.6x 2.3x
Cash ratio 2.0x 0.8x 1.8x
Altman Z-score 4.68 4.85 5.16

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricICCCZTSBFLY
Dividend yield – 2.6% –
Net buyback yield -0.2% 10.6% -0.5%
Shareholder yield -0.2% 13.2% -0.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 34.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 38.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 6.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 10.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusICCCZTSBFLY
Forward P/E – 14.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year – $5.86FY2026 $-0.10FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -8.6%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +13.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year – $9.57BFY2026 $114.50MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.0%FY2026 +17.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -7.9% +26.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersICCCZTSBFLY
Held by institutions 15.0% 94.7% 59.9%
Institutions holding 32 1,419 248
Change in shares held, QoQ -2.6% -2.6% +13.9%
Institutions buying 15 675 144
Institutions selling 7 583 59
Buyers to sellers 2.14 1.16 2.44

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

ICCCZTSBFLY
ICCC 1.00 0.08 0.03
ZTS 0.08 1.00 0.16
BFLY 0.03 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, ICCC, ZTS and BFLY?

Zoetis (ZTS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Immucell (ICCC) $93.91M, Zoetis (ZTS) $36.86B, Butterfly Network (BFLY) $1.78B.

Which stock is cheaper, ICCC, ZTS and BFLY?

Zoetis (ZTS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Immucell (ICCC) 119.3x, Zoetis (ZTS) 14.1x, Butterfly Network (BFLY) -33.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Butterfly Network (BFLY) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Immucell (ICCC) +8.5%, Zoetis (ZTS) +1.5%, Butterfly Network (BFLY) +39.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Zoetis (ZTS) has the highest net margin (Immucell (ICCC) 2.6%, Zoetis (ZTS) 27.5%, Butterfly Network (BFLY) -43.6%). On return on invested capital, Zoetis (ZTS) leads (Immucell (ICCC) 9.2%, Zoetis (ZTS) 23.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Butterfly Network (BFLY) returned the most: Immucell (ICCC) +65.1%, Zoetis (ZTS) -42.5%, Butterfly Network (BFLY) +119.9%. Over five years, Immucell (ICCC) compounded fastest (Immucell (ICCC) +3.2%/yr, Zoetis (ZTS) -17.6%/yr, Butterfly Network (BFLY) -9.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Immucell (ICCC) 0.00%, Zoetis (ZTS) 0.02%, Butterfly Network (BFLY) 0.00%. Immucell (ICCC) and Butterfly Network (BFLY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Zoetis (ZTS) has been the steadiest (Immucell (ICCC) 50.6%, Zoetis (ZTS) 40.9%, Butterfly Network (BFLY) 112.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, ICCC, ZTS and BFLY?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Zoetis (ZTS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.