HUM vs PHG vs INNV Stock Comparison

Humana, Koninklijke Philips and InnovAge Holding Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CVS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HUM Humana Inc
$417.04 +4.7% 1M +43.5% 1Y
Market cap
$49.58B
P/E
38.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$145.68B
Div. yield
–
Managed Care Healthcare
2 wins
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$26.56 +6.4% 1M -7.9% 1Y
Market cap
$25.13B
P/E
13.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.60B
Div. yield
–
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
6 wins
INNV InnovAge Holding Corp.
$9.27 +3.0% 1M +75.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.22B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$989.71M
Div. yield
–
Home Health and Senior Care Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Koninklijke Philips leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Koninklijke Philips 6, InnovAge Holding 3, Humana 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHUMPHGINNVLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $49.58B $25.13B $1.22B HUM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.8x 13.6x -482.2x PHG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 48.2x 13.4x 20.6x PHG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.3% +6.1% +15.9% HUM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.9% 8.9% -0.3% PHG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.7% 11.5% 0.0% PHG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 1.8x -3.8x INNV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +43.5% -7.9% +75.9% INNV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -1.9%/yr -10.8%/yr +8.1%/yr INNV
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.1% 28.8% 72.8% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 45/100 80/100 66/100 PHG

Percentile Scorecard

HUMPHGINNV

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHUMPHGINNV
Valuation 58 #11 of 25 98 #6 of 228 63 #35 of 93
Growth 13 #21 of 24 96 #11 of 221 87 #12 of 88
Profitability 44 #14 of 24 96 #10 of 208 49 #45 of 87
Financial Health 68 #9 of 26 31 #166 of 239 64 #37 of 100
Shareholder Returns 40 #10 of 16 79 #29 of 137 –
Overall 45 80 66
  • HUM ranked among 27 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors
  • PHG ranked among 248 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • INNV ranked among 103 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHUMPHGINNVSPY
1 month +4.7%+6.4%+3.0% -0.8%
3 months +9.4%+6.2%-19.3% +3.5%
6 months +86.5%-3.6%+14.6% +7.0%
Year to date +62.8%-1.9%+78.6% +12.2%
1 year +43.5%-7.9%+75.9% +13.0%
3 years -18.3%+43.6%+66.7% +86.3%
3 years, per year -6.5%+12.8%+18.6% +23.1%
5 years -9.1%-43.6%+47.4% +68.6%
5 years, per year -1.9%-10.8%+8.1% +11.0%
10 years +138.8%-11.6%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +9.1%-1.2%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureHUMPHGINNVSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.1%28.8%72.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.9%28.8%66.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.580.810.56 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.90-0.271.04 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.9%-75.6%-71.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.8%-19.3%-23.5% -1.8%
52-week high $433.45$32.91$12.11 $779.14
52-week low $163.67$23.81$3.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHUMPHGINNV
P/E now vs peer median 39.1xmedian 24.3x 13.7xmedian 30.6x -495.8xmedian 25.1x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.3x 1.2xmedian 3.0x 1.3xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.7xmedian 13.5x 8.1xmedian 17.5x 47.6xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.7xmedian 15.6x 5.9xmedian 23.3x 25.0xmedian 22.4x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.5x 2.0xmedian 2.4x 5.3xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median -1.46median 1.33 0.32median 0.87 -8.22median 0.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHUMPHGINNV
Revenue $145.68B $20.60B $989.71M
Gross profit $19.89B $16.03B $677.61M
Operating income $2.71B $2.65B $2.62M
Net income $1.29B $1.39B -$1.83M
Free cash flow $1.95B $4.34B $50.41M
R&D – $2.00B –
EPS (diluted) $10.56 $1.91 $-0.02
Cash & equivalents $6.89B $2.04B $97.89M
Total debt $54.48B $9.51B $48.06M
Shares (diluted) 121.14M 962.50M 135.70M
Enterprise value -$38.28B $14.24B $708.03M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHUMPHGINNV
P/E 39.1x 13.7x -495.8x
P/FCF 25.7x 5.9x 25.0x
P/Operating cash flow 19.7x 9.6x 19.5x
P/S 0.3x 1.2x 1.3x
P/B 2.6x 2.0x 5.3x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 2.5x 5.4x
EV/EBITDA 11.7x 8.1x 47.6x
EV/EBIT 15.1x 12.4x 446.0x
EV/Revenue 0.3x 1.6x 1.2x
EV/FCF 20.9x 7.6x 23.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.1x 12.4x 18.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.46 0.32 -8.22

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHUMPHGINNV
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.3% 6.1% 15.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.8% 2.3% 12.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.5% 82.4% 15.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 6.7% 12.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -17.9% 121.3% 108.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.3% 52.0% 27.1%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.3% 293.5% 94.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -27.4% 35.6% 65.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -19.1% 539.4% 91.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -26.9% 42.2% 60.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.4% 116.7% 96.9%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -42.3% 53.6% 47.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -20.1% 54.2% 89.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -45.6% 45.6% 162.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHUMPHGINNV
Gross margin 13.7% 77.8% 68.5%
EBITDA margin 2.4% 19.8% 2.5%
Operating margin 1.9% 12.9% 0.3%
Pretax margin 1.1% 11.9% 0.0%
Net margin 0.9% 8.9% -0.3%
FCF margin 1.3% 21.1% 5.1%
Operating cash flow margin 1.7% 12.9% 6.5%
Return on equity 6.8% 12.7% -0.3%
Return on assets 2.3% 5.4% -0.1%
Return on invested capital 6.7% 11.5% 0.0%
Return on capital employed 8.1% 11.8% 0.8%
Asset turnover 2.6x 0.7x 1.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 1.9x -35.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.7% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHUMPHGINNV
Debt / assets 25.5% 31.2% 8.6%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.7x 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 1.8x -3.8x
Debt / FCF 7.5x 2.2x 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 66.3% 57.1% 57.2%
Equity / assets 33.7% 42.9% 42.8%
Interest coverage 3.8x 6.2x –
Current ratio 1.7x 1.3x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.2x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 4.61 – 3.92

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHUMPHGINNV
Dividend yield 0.6% 3.7% –
Net buyback yield 0.3% -0.5% –
Shareholder yield 0.9% 3.3% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHUMPHGINNV
Forward P/E 48.2xFY2026 13.4xFY2026 20.6xFY2027
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 $1.98FY2026 $0.45FY2027
EPS growth, next FY -49.5%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +84.9% -10.1% +4.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $166.70BFY2026 $21.63BFY2026 $1.00BFY2027
Revenue growth, next FY +28.6%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 +1.5%FY2027
Revenue growth, the year after +7.6% -8.2% +11.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHUMPHGINNV
Held by institutions 98.6% 5.4% 13.5%
Institutions holding 927 363 106
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.7% +0.8% +15.2%
Institutions buying 558 266 70
Institutions selling 266 76 24
Buyers to sellers 2.10 3.50 2.92

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HUMPHGINNV
HUM 1.00 0.03 0.11
PHG 0.03 1.00 0.19
INNV 0.11 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HUM, PHG and INNV?

Humana (HUM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Humana (HUM) $49.58B, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $25.13B, InnovAge Holding (INNV) $1.22B.

Which stock is cheaper, HUM, PHG and INNV?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Humana (HUM) 38.8x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.6x, InnovAge Holding (INNV) -482.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) is cheapest (Humana (HUM) 48.2x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.4x, InnovAge Holding (INNV) 20.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Humana (HUM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Humana (HUM) +18.3%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +6.1%, InnovAge Holding (INNV) +15.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has the highest net margin (Humana (HUM) 0.9%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 8.9%, InnovAge Holding (INNV) -0.3%). On return on invested capital, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads (Humana (HUM) 6.7%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 11.5%, InnovAge Holding (INNV) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year InnovAge Holding (INNV) returned the most: Humana (HUM) +43.5%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -7.9%, InnovAge Holding (INNV) +75.9%. Over five years, InnovAge Holding (INNV) compounded fastest (Humana (HUM) -1.9%/yr, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -10.8%/yr, InnovAge Holding (INNV) +8.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (Humana (HUM) 48.1%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.8%, InnovAge Holding (INNV) 72.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HUM, PHG and INNV?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.