HUM vs PHG vs FMS Stock Comparison

Humana, Koninklijke Philips and Fresenius Medical Care AG Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CNC) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HUM Humana Inc
$411.98 +5.8% 1M +39.7% 1Y
Market cap
$49.47B
P/E
38.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$145.68B
Div. yield
0.65%
Managed Care Healthcare
5 wins
PHG Koninklijke Philips Nv
$27.05 +7.7% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$26.05B
P/E
13.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$20.60B
Div. yield
3.66%
Diagnostic Equipment Healthcare
3 wins
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG
$22.62 -1.4% 1M -16.5% 1Y
Market cap
$12.64B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.07B
Div. yield
3.80%
Healthcare Services Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Humana leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Humana 5, Fresenius Medical Care AG 4, Koninklijke Philips 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHUMPHGFMSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $49.47B $26.05B $12.64B HUM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 38.7x 13.9x 12.0x FMS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 47.6x 13.7x 9.5x FMS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.3% +6.1% -47.8% HUM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.9% 8.9% 9.9% FMS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.7% 11.5% 0.2% PHG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 1.8x 200.7x HUM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.65% 3.66% 3.80% FMS
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +39.7% -0.9% -16.5% HUM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.3%/yr -10.6%/yr -7.4%/yr HUM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.1% 28.3% 31.1% PHG
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 80/100 51/100 PHG

Percentile Scorecard

HUMPHGFMS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHUMPHGFMS
Valuation 54 #12 of 25 98 #6 of 227 74 #25 of 92
Growth 13 #21 of 24 95 #11 of 219 12 #77 of 87
Profitability 44 #14 of 24 96 #9 of 205 65 #31 of 86
Financial Health 68 #9 of 26 31 #163 of 237 14 #84 of 97
Shareholder Returns 33 #11 of 16 79 #29 of 135 93 #5 of 55
Overall 42 80 51
  • HUM ranked among 27 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors
  • PHG ranked among 247 companies in Medical Devices and Diagnostics
  • FMS ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHUMPHGFMSSPY
1 month +5.8%+7.7%-1.4% +0.9%
3 months +12.6%+3.6%-9.1% +5.9%
6 months +69.5%+5.7%+2.1% +8.5%
Year to date +60.8%-0.1%-5.0% +13.3%
1 year +39.7%-0.9%-16.5% +12.4%
3 years -19.2%+46.2%+37.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year -6.9%+13.5%+11.3% +23.5%
5 years -11.1%-42.8%-31.9% +68.2%
5 years, per year -2.3%-10.6%-7.4% +11.0%
10 years +140.8%-10.4%-44.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year +9.2%-1.1%-5.7% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureHUMPHGFMSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.1%28.3%31.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.4%27.7%37.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.570.820.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.83-0.03-0.53 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.9%-75.6%-63.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -5.0%-17.8%-16.5% -0.9%
52-week high $433.45$32.91$27.09 $779.14
52-week low $163.67$23.81$20.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHUMPHGFMS
P/E now vs peer median 38.7xmedian 23.9x 13.9xmedian 28.8x 12.0xmedian 25.6x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.3x 1.3xmedian 3.0x 1.1xmedian 1.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 12.7x 8.2xmedian 17.4x 205.4xmedian 16.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.4xmedian 15.4x 6.0xmedian 25.7x 6.1xmedian 21.3x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.5x 2.0xmedian 2.4x 0.8xmedian 3.3x
PEG now vs peer median -1.44median 1.34 0.33median 1.03 0.58median 0.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHUMPHGFMS
Revenue $145.68B $20.60B $11.07B
Gross profit $19.89B $16.03B -$5.62B
Operating income $2.71B $2.65B $879.32M
Net income $1.29B $1.39B $1.38B
Free cash flow $1.95B $4.34B $2.08B
R&D – $2.00B $180.01M
EPS (diluted) $10.56 $1.91 $1.79
Cash & equivalents $6.89B $2.04B $1.21B
Total debt $54.48B $9.51B $572.99B
Shares (diluted) 121.14M 962.50M 612.52M
Enterprise value -$38.33B $15.19B $5.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHUMPHGFMS
P/E 38.7x 13.9x 12.0x
P/FCF 25.4x 6.0x 6.1x
P/Operating cash flow 19.5x 9.8x 3.8x
P/S 0.3x 1.3x 1.1x
P/B 2.6x 2.0x 0.8x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 2.6x 0.9x
EV/EBITDA 11.5x 8.2x 205.4x
EV/EBIT 14.9x 12.6x 628.3x
EV/Revenue 0.3x 1.6x 49.9x
EV/FCF 20.6x 7.7x 265.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.8x 12.6x 167.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.44 0.33 0.58

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHUMPHGFMS
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.3% 6.1% -47.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.8% 2.3% -18.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.5% 82.4% -207.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.6% 6.7% -45.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -17.9% 121.3% -45.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.3% 52.0% -16.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.3% 293.5% 49.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -27.4% 35.6% 18.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -19.1% 539.4% 52.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -26.9% 42.2% 20.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.4% 116.7% 9.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -42.3% 53.6% 9.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -20.1% 54.2% -7.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -45.6% 45.6% 4.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHUMPHGFMS
Gross margin 13.7% 77.8% -50.7%
EBITDA margin 2.4% 19.8% 24.3%
Operating margin 1.9% 12.9% 7.9%
Pretax margin 1.1% 11.9% 15.8%
Net margin 0.9% 8.9% 9.9%
FCF margin 1.3% 21.1% 18.8%
Operating cash flow margin 1.7% 12.9% 29.8%
Return on equity 6.8% 12.7% 2.7%
Return on assets 2.3% 5.4% 1.2%
Return on invested capital 6.7% 11.5% 0.2%
Return on capital employed 8.1% 11.8% 3.2%
Asset turnover 2.6x 0.7x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 1.9x 2.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% 0.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHUMPHGFMS
Debt / assets 25.5% 31.2% 1,515%
Debt / equity 0.8x 0.7x 35.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 1.8x 200.7x
Debt / FCF 7.5x 2.2x 260.4x
Liabilities / assets 66.3% 57.1% 56.8%
Equity / assets 33.7% 42.9% 43.2%
Interest coverage 3.8x 6.2x 2.0x
Current ratio 1.7x 1.3x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.7x 0.2x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.60 – 1.33

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHUMPHGFMS
Dividend yield 0.6% 3.7% 3.8%
Net buyback yield 0.3% -0.5% 8.5%
Shareholder yield 1.0% 3.2% 12.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHUMPHGFMS
Forward P/E 47.6xFY2026 13.7xFY2026 9.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 $1.98FY2026 $2.37FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -49.5%FY2026 +6.5%FY2026 -6.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +84.9% -10.1% +7.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year $166.70BFY2026 $21.63BFY2026 $21.50BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.6%FY2026 +1.8%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.6% -8.2% -0.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHUMPHGFMS
Held by institutions 98.6% 5.4% 7.3%
Institutions holding 927 363 235
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.7% +0.8% -2.9%
Institutions buying 558 266 151
Institutions selling 266 76 41
Buyers to sellers 2.10 3.50 3.68

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HUMPHGFMS
HUM 1.00 0.03 0.14
PHG 0.03 1.00 0.26
FMS 0.14 0.26 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HUM, PHG and FMS?

Humana (HUM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Humana (HUM) $49.47B, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) $26.05B, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) $12.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, HUM, PHG and FMS?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Humana (HUM) 38.7x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.9x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 12.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) is cheapest (Humana (HUM) 47.6x, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 13.7x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Humana (HUM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Humana (HUM) +18.3%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) +6.1%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -47.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest net margin (Humana (HUM) 0.9%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 8.9%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.9%). On return on invested capital, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) leads (Humana (HUM) 6.7%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 11.5%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 0.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Humana (HUM) returned the most: Humana (HUM) +39.7%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -0.9%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -16.5%. Over five years, Humana (HUM) compounded fastest (Humana (HUM) -2.3%/yr, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) -10.6%/yr, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -7.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest dividend yield: Humana (HUM) 0.65%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 3.66%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 3.80%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) has been the steadiest (Humana (HUM) 48.1%, Koninklijke Philips (PHG) 28.3%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 31.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HUM, PHG and FMS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Humana (HUM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.