HUM vs FMS vs CVS Stock Comparison

Humana, Fresenius Medical Care AG and Cvs Health Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MOH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HUM Humana Inc
$415.02 +4.2% 1M +42.0% 1Y
Market cap
$49.96B
P/E
39.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$145.68B
Div. yield
–
Managed Care Healthcare
4 wins
FMS Fresenius Medical Care AG
$22.50 -0.8% 1M -17.3% 1Y
Market cap
$13.15B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.07B
Div. yield
–
Healthcare Services Healthcare
4 wins
CVS CVS HEALTH Corp
$91.11 +2.2% 1M +10.5% 1Y
Market cap
$115.70B
P/E
23.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$415.09B
Div. yield
–
Managed Care Healthcare
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fresenius Medical Care AG leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Fresenius Medical Care AG 4, Humana 4, Cvs Health 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHUMFMSCVSLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $49.96B $13.15B $115.70B CVS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 39.1x 12.0x 23.7x FMS
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 48.0x 9.5x 10.6x FMS
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.3% -47.8% +7.4% HUM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 0.9% 9.9% 1.2% FMS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 6.7% 0.2% 5.0% HUM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 200.7x 3.7x HUM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +42.0% -17.3% +10.5% HUM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.4%/yr -8.3%/yr +0.6%/yr CVS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.0% 31.1% 32.4% FMS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 42/100 51/100 51/100 CVS

Percentile Scorecard

HUMFMSCVS

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHUMFMSCVS
Valuation 54 #12 of 25 71 #27 of 92 79 #6 of 25
Growth 13 #21 of 24 12 #77 of 87 48 #13 of 24
Profitability 39 #15 of 24 64 #32 of 86 48 #13 of 24
Financial Health 68 #9 of 26 14 #84 of 97 16 #22 of 26
Shareholder Returns 36 #10 of 15 93 #5 of 56 64 #6 of 15
Overall 42 51 51
  • HUM ranked among 27 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors
  • FMS ranked among 102 companies in Healthcare Providers
  • CVS ranked among 27 companies in Healthcare Payers and Distributors

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHUMFMSCVSSPY
1 month +4.2%-0.8%+2.2% -0.2%
3 months +6.7%-9.1%-16.7% +3.9%
6 months +80.7%0.0%+12.5% +8.2%
Year to date +62.0%-5.5%+14.8% +12.9%
1 year +42.0%-17.3%+10.5% +12.3%
3 years -18.7%+37.2%+37.4% +87.4%
3 years, per year -6.7%+11.1%+11.2% +23.3%
5 years -11.2%-35.2%+2.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -2.4%-8.3%+0.6% +10.9%
10 years +138.3%-44.4%+4.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +9.1%-5.7%+0.4% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureHUMFMSCVSSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.0%31.1%32.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.7%36.8%34.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.570.190.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.87-0.560.32 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -70.9%-63.9%-60.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.3%-17.3%-17.6% -1.2%
52-week high $433.45$27.20$110.55 $779.14
52-week low $163.67$20.19$70.08 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHUMFMSCVS
P/E now vs peer median 39.0xmedian 23.9x 12.0xmedian 24.6x 23.8xmedian 23.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 0.3x 1.1xmedian 1.6x 0.3xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.6xmedian 13.4x 205.4xmedian 14.6x 12.8xmedian 13.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 25.6xmedian 15.5x 6.0xmedian 21.6x 9.9xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 2.6xmedian 2.5x 0.8xmedian 3.2x 1.5xmedian 2.5x
PEG now vs peer median -1.45median 1.34 0.57median 0.66 1.31median 1.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHUMFMSCVS
Revenue $145.68B $11.07B $415.09B
Gross profit $19.89B -$5.62B $184.68B
Operating income $2.71B $879.32M $8.29B
Net income $1.29B $1.38B $4.93B
Free cash flow $1.95B $2.08B $11.76B
R&D – $180.01M –
EPS (diluted) $10.56 $1.79 $3.80
Cash & equivalents $6.89B $1.21B $11.33B
Total debt $54.48B $572.99B $61.41B
Shares (diluted) 121.14M 612.52M 1.29B
Enterprise value -$37.90B $5.10B $68.11B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHUMFMSCVS
P/E 39.0x 12.0x 23.8x
P/FCF 25.6x 6.0x 9.9x
P/Operating cash flow 19.6x 3.8x 7.9x
P/S 0.3x 1.1x 0.3x
P/B 2.6x 0.8x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 2.6x 0.9x 2.1x
EV/EBITDA 11.6x 205.4x 12.8x
EV/EBIT 15.0x 628.2x 19.8x
EV/Revenue 0.3x 49.9x 0.4x
EV/FCF 20.8x 265.6x 13.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 16.0x 167.5x 11.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.45 0.57 1.31

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHUMFMSCVS
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.3% -47.8% 7.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 13.8% -18.6% 7.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 7.5% -207.2% 6.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 3.6% -45.2% 11.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) -17.9% -45.5% -7.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -15.3% -16.4% 8.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -18.3% 49.8% 8.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -27.4% 18.2% 18.2%
EPS growth (1Y) -19.1% 52.0% 6.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -26.9% 20.9% 18.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -13.4% 9.3% 95.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -42.3% 9.3% -10.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -20.1% -7.7% 146.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -45.6% 4.8% -12.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHUMFMSCVS
Gross margin 13.7% -50.7% 44.5%
EBITDA margin 2.4% 24.3% 3.1%
Operating margin 1.9% 7.9% 2.0%
Pretax margin 1.1% 15.8% 1.4%
Net margin 0.9% 9.9% 1.2%
FCF margin 1.3% 18.8% 2.8%
Operating cash flow margin 1.7% 29.8% 3.6%
Return on equity 6.8% 2.7% 6.2%
Return on assets 2.3% 1.2% 1.9%
Return on invested capital 6.7% 0.2% 5.0%
Return on capital employed 8.1% 3.2% 5.0%
Asset turnover 2.6x 0.3x 1.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 2.4x 3.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.2% – 0.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHUMFMSCVS
Debt / assets 25.5% 1,515% 24.2%
Debt / equity 0.8x 35.0x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA -2.7x 200.7x 3.7x
Debt / FCF 7.5x 260.4x 5.2x
Liabilities / assets 66.3% 56.8% 68.5%
Equity / assets 33.7% 43.2% 31.5%
Interest coverage 3.8x 2.0x 2.7x
Current ratio 1.7x 1.1x 0.9x
Quick ratio 1.3x 0.2x 0.8x
Cash ratio 1.0x 0.2x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 4.60 1.32 2.45

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHUMFMSCVS
Dividend yield 0.6% 3.8% 2.9%
Net buyback yield 0.3% 8.6% -0.4%
Shareholder yield 0.9% 12.4% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHUMFMSCVS
Forward P/E 48.0xFY2026 9.5xFY2026 10.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $8.65FY2026 $2.37FY2026 $8.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -49.5%FY2026 -6.0%FY2026 +27.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +84.9% +7.6% +1.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $166.70BFY2026 $21.50BFY2026 $427.31BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.6%FY2026 -7.0%FY2026 +6.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +7.6% -0.3% -4.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHUMFMSCVS
Held by institutions 98.6% 7.3% 89.1%
Institutions holding 927 235 2,070
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.7% -2.9% +3.5%
Institutions buying 558 151 1,102
Institutions selling 266 41 730
Buyers to sellers 2.10 3.68 1.51

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HUMFMSCVS
HUM 1.00 0.14 0.54
FMS 0.14 1.00 0.21
CVS 0.54 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HUM, FMS and CVS?

Cvs Health (CVS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Humana (HUM) $49.96B, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) $13.15B, Cvs Health (CVS) $115.70B.

Which stock is cheaper, HUM, FMS and CVS?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Humana (HUM) 39.1x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 12.0x, Cvs Health (CVS) 23.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) is cheapest (Humana (HUM) 48.0x, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.5x, Cvs Health (CVS) 10.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Humana (HUM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Humana (HUM) +18.3%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -47.8%, Cvs Health (CVS) +7.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has the highest net margin (Humana (HUM) 0.9%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 9.9%, Cvs Health (CVS) 1.2%). On return on invested capital, Humana (HUM) leads (Humana (HUM) 6.7%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 0.2%, Cvs Health (CVS) 5.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Humana (HUM) returned the most: Humana (HUM) +42.0%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -17.3%, Cvs Health (CVS) +10.5%. Over five years, Cvs Health (CVS) compounded fastest (Humana (HUM) -2.4%/yr, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) -8.3%/yr, Cvs Health (CVS) +0.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) has been the steadiest (Humana (HUM) 48.0%, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) 31.1%, Cvs Health (CVS) 32.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HUM, FMS and CVS?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fresenius Medical Care AG (FMS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.