HUCK vs SRAD vs FICO Stock Comparison

Huckleberry.ai, Sportradar Group AG and Fair Isaac Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PLTR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HUCK Huckleberry.ai, Inc.
$3.02 -5.6% 1M -78.0% 1Y
Market cap
$132.19M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$315.21M
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
SRAD Sportradar Group AG
$12.87 +9.4% 1M -49.7% 1Y
Market cap
$4.01B
P/E
669.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.62B
Div. yield
–
Data Infrastructure Technology
4 wins
FICO Fair Isaac Corp
$724.14 +9.6% 1M -56.4% 1Y
Market cap
$15.64B
P/E
20.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.39B
Div. yield
–
Analytics and BI Technology
7 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fair Isaac leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fair Isaac 7, Sportradar Group AG 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHUCKSRADFICOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $132.19M $4.01B $15.64B FICO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -3.3x 669.2x 20.1x FICO
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 43.1x 49.5x 16.6x FICO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.0% +24.7% +24.1% SRAD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -13.4% 1.2% 34.1% FICO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -8.6% 62.6% FICO
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 67.5x 1.4x 4.3x SRAD
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -78.0% -49.7% -56.4% SRAD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -49.1%/yr -10.5%/yr +13.5%/yr FICO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 101.1% 57.0% 66.9% SRAD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 25/100 59/100 75/100 FICO

Percentile Scorecard

HUCKSRADFICO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHUCKSRADFICO
Valuation 33 #67 of 100 78 #28 of 124 63 #38 of 100
Growth 33 #65 of 97 60 #46 of 113 82 #18 of 97
Profitability 37 #60 of 94 70 #34 of 110 100 #1 of 94
Financial Health 6 #105 of 111 56 #57 of 129 33 #75 of 111
Shareholder Returns 18 #53 of 64 29 #48 of 67 95 #4 of 64
Overall 25 59 75
  • HUCK ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications
  • SRAD ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • FICO ranked among 114 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHUCKSRADFICOSPY
1 month -5.6%+9.4%+9.6% -2.3%
3 months -22.8%+4.3%-30.8% -0.7%
6 months -22.4%-1.2%-31.7% +4.8%
Year to date -64.2%-45.9%-57.2% +10.3%
1 year -78.0%-49.7%-56.4% +10.3%
3 years -65.3%+33.1%-22.2% +73.0%
3 years, per year -29.7%+10.0%-8.0% +20.1%
5 years -96.6%-42.7%+88.6% +61.9%
5 years, per year -49.1%-10.5%+13.5% +10.1%
10 years ——+525.8% +258.6%
10 years, per year ——+20.1% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureHUCKSRADFICOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 101.1%57.0%66.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 108.6%64.4%82.0% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.140.530.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.77-0.87-0.84 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -97.8%-69.0%-75.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -78.3%-50.7%-60.8% -3.5%
52-week high $13.93$26.09$1,844.98 $779.14
52-week low $2.00$11.56$592.49 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHUCKSRADFICO
P/E now vs peer median -3.3xmedian 28.5x 669.2xmedian 35.6x 20.1xmedian 28.5x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 2.8x 2.5xmedian 4.2x 6.5xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 147.0xmedian 16.8x -14.7xmedian 30.0x 16.7xmedian 16.8x
P/FCF now vs peer median -15.0xmedian 16.2x 7.9xmedian 25.2x 15.7xmedian 16.2x
P/B now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 2.9x 4.5xmedian 3.2x -3.8xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -0.12median 0.90 23.12median 1.21 0.68median 0.90

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHUCKSRADFICO
Revenue $315.21M $1.62B $2.39B
Gross profit $237.80M – $2.04B
Operating income -$30.85M – $1.24B
Net income -$42.15M $19.94M $815.02M
Free cash flow -$8.79M $510.26M $996.02M
R&D $74.68M $44.37M $208.49M
EPS (diluted) $-0.92 $64,328.88 $35.90
Cash & equivalents $25.10M $286.82M $248.44M
Total debt $137.24M $12.43M $5.58B
Shares (diluted) 46.00M 310.00 22.70M
Enterprise value -$22.83M $2.30B $14.88B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHUCKSRADFICO
P/E -3.3x 669.2x 20.1x
P/FCF -15.0x 7.9x 15.7x
P/Operating cash flow -221.4x 8.0x 15.6x
P/S 0.4x 2.5x 6.5x
P/B -0.7x 4.5x -3.8x
P/Tangible book -0.7x 4.5x -3.8x
EV/EBITDA 147.0x -14.7x 16.7x
EV/EBIT -7.9x -43.7x 17.0x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 2.3x 8.8x
EV/FCF -27.8x 7.2x 21.1x
EV/Operating cash flow -409.3x 7.3x 20.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.12 23.12 0.68

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHUCKSRADFICO
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.0% 24.7% 24.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -0.3% 23.9% 17.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 0.1% – 29.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -0.7% – 20.6%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.3% – 39.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 22.0% – 26.5%
Net income growth (1Y) 45.6% -83.5% 28.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 20.5% 51.8% 24.9%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.9% -94.7% 39.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 26.9% 28.9% 29.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -123.5% 15.0% 28.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 57.6% 30.5% 30.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -17.9% 15.7% 28.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 22.6% 30.7% 30.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHUCKSRADFICO
Gross margin 75.4% – 85.1%
EBITDA margin 0.5% -15.4% 52.3%
Operating margin -9.8% – 51.7%
Pretax margin -12.8% 1.4% 44.5%
Net margin -13.4% 1.2% 34.1%
FCF margin -2.8% 31.6% 41.6%
Operating cash flow margin -0.2% 31.0% 41.8%
Return on equity – 2.1% –
Return on assets -22.7% 0.7% 39.9%
Return on invested capital – -8.6% 62.6%
Return on capital employed – -3.5% 95.3%
Asset turnover 1.7x 0.5x 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.0x 25.1x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue 16.2% 4.2% 7.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHUCKSRADFICO
Debt / assets 78.4% 0.4% 274.0%
Debt / equity -0.7x 0.0x -1.4x
Net debt / EBITDA 67.5x 1.4x 4.3x
Debt / FCF -15.6x 0.0x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 207.1% 69.5% 301.1%
Equity / assets -107.1% 30.5% -201.1%
Interest coverage – -0.8x 6.6x
Current ratio 0.3x 1.0x 1.2x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.9x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.6x 0.3x
Altman Z-score -12.87 1.81 8.37

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHUCKSRADFICO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.7% -1.0% 22.8%
Shareholder yield -0.7% -1.0% 22.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHUCKSRADFICO
Forward P/E 43.1xFY2026 49.5xFY2026 16.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.07FY2026 $0.26FY2026 $43.69FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -27.8%FY2026 +46.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -28.6% +100.0% +11.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $301.44MFY2026 $1.65BFY2026 $2.41BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -5.5%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026 +21.0%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -1.9% +10.8% +18.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHUCKSRADFICO
Held by institutions – 17.8% 95.7%
Institutions holding – 151 844
Change in shares held, QoQ – -2.8% +1.9%
Institutions buying – 88 382
Institutions selling – 42 344
Buyers to sellers – 2.10 1.11

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HUCKSRADFICO
HUCK 1.00 0.12 0.10
SRAD 0.12 1.00 0.27
FICO 0.10 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HUCK, SRAD and FICO?

Fair Isaac (FICO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) $132.19M, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) $4.01B, Fair Isaac (FICO) $15.64B.

Which stock is cheaper, HUCK, SRAD and FICO?

Fair Isaac (FICO) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -3.3x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 669.2x, Fair Isaac (FICO) 20.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fair Isaac (FICO) is cheapest (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 43.1x, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 49.5x, Fair Isaac (FICO) 16.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -1.0%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) +24.7%, Fair Isaac (FICO) +24.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fair Isaac (FICO) has the highest net margin (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -13.4%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 1.2%, Fair Isaac (FICO) 34.1%). On return on invested capital, Fair Isaac (FICO) leads (Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -8.6%, Fair Isaac (FICO) 62.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) returned the most: Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -78.0%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -49.7%, Fair Isaac (FICO) -56.4%. Over five years, Fair Isaac (FICO) compounded fastest (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) -49.1%/yr, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) -10.5%/yr, Fair Isaac (FICO) +13.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) has been the steadiest (Huckleberry.ai (HUCK) 101.1%, Sportradar Group AG (SRAD) 57.0%, Fair Isaac (FICO) 66.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HUCK, SRAD and FICO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fair Isaac (FICO) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.