HP vs ZNOG vs NBR Stock Comparison

Helmerich & Payne, Zion Oil & Gas and Nabors Industries Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PDS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HP Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
$38.85 +0.8% 1M +47.9% 1Y
Market cap
$3.88B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.00B
Div. yield
2.57%
Land Drilling Energy
4 wins
ZNOG Zion Oil & Gas Inc
$0.36 -14.3% 1M +80.0% 1Y
Market cap
$427.90K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
2 wins
NBR Nabors Industries Ltd
$84.73 +6.4% 1M +74.6% 1Y
Market cap
$1.35B
P/E
4.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.23B
Div. yield
–
Land Drilling Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Helmerich & Payne leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Helmerich & Payne 4, Nabors Industries 3, Zion Oil & Gas 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHPZNOGNBRLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.88B $427.90K $1.35B HP
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -28.3x -0.1x 4.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.6% — +5.6% HP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.4% — 7.6% NBR
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.0% — 2.7% NBR
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.0x — 2.1x HP
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.57% — 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +47.9% +80.0% +74.6% ZNOG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +3.1%/yr +24.6%/yr -3.8%/yr ZNOG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.2% 71.4% 50.8% HP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 41/100 38/100 63/100 NBR

Percentile Scorecard

HPZNOGNBR

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHPZNOGNBR
Valuation 74 #13 of 47 32 #68 of 99 91 #5 of 47
Growth 40 #27 of 44 42 #57 of 97 61 #18 of 44
Profitability 30 #29 of 41 15 #81 of 95 83 #8 of 41
Financial Health 31 #32 of 46 96 #5 of 102 18 #38 of 46
Shareholder Returns 32 #22 of 32 4 #74 of 77 –
Overall 41 38 63
  • HP ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • ZNOG ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream
  • NBR ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHPZNOGNBRSPY
1 month +0.8%-14.3%+6.4% -2.3%
3 months +13.7%-7.7%+0.7% -0.7%
6 months -4.4%-10.0%-18.3% +4.8%
Year to date +35.5%+63.6%+56.0% +10.3%
1 year +47.9%+80.0%+74.6% +10.3%
3 years -6.1%+500.0%-16.0% +73.0%
3 years, per year -2.1%+81.8%-5.6% +20.1%
5 years +16.5%+200.0%-17.6% +61.9%
5 years, per year +3.1%+24.6%-3.8% +10.1%
10 years -37.7%-71.0%-85.0% +258.6%
10 years, per year -4.6%-11.6%-17.3% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureHPZNOGNBRSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.2%71.4%50.8% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.5%78.5%48.4% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.200.530.40 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.081.121.47 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.9%-91.4%-87.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -18.5%-44.6%-23.4% -3.5%
52-week high $47.64$0.65$110.63 $779.14
52-week low $26.10$0.16$46.19 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHPZNOGNBR
P/E now vs peer median -28.3xmedian 24.4x -0.1xmedian 11.1x 4.9xmedian 24.4x
P/S now vs peer median 1.0xmedian 1.2x —median 1.9x 0.4xmedian 1.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.7xmedian 8.7x 1.2xmedian 5.7x 3.8xmedian 8.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 14.5x 0.0xmedian 9.6x 34.1xmedian 14.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 1.7x 0.0xmedian 1.4x 1.4xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.86median 0.49 0.00median 0.62 0.06median 0.49

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHPZNOGNBR
Revenue $4.00B – $3.23B
Gross profit $1.27B – $1.25B
Operating income $89.92M -$8.22M $125.73M
Net income -$130.00M -$8.19M $322.20M
Free cash flow $315.29M -$17.64M $39.65M
R&D $27.14M – $54.02M
EPS (diluted) $-1.37 $-0.01 $17.31
Cash & equivalents $204.43M $9.61M $509.78M
Total debt $1.86B – $2.12B
Shares (diluted) 100.03M 843.21M 14.27M
Enterprise value $3.06B -$38.57M -$531.21M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHPZNOGNBR
P/E -28.3x -0.1x 4.9x
P/FCF 12.3x 0.0x 34.1x
P/Operating cash flow 6.7x -0.1x 1.9x
P/S 1.0x – 0.4x
P/B 1.5x 0.0x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.7x 0.0x 1.4x
EV/EBITDA 6.7x 1.2x 3.8x
EV/EBIT 61.3x 1.1x 23.6x
EV/Revenue 1.4x – 0.9x
EV/FCF 17.5x 0.5x 74.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.5x 1.1x 4.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.86 0.00 0.06

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHPZNOGNBR
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.6% – 5.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% – 2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% – -0.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.1% – 0.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) -20.0% -14.5% -53.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -45.2% 46.9% -23.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -340.3% -15.0% 3,034%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -32.4% 46.9% 180.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -341.3% -15.0% 298.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.9% 54.2% 88.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% -46.0% 32.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.7% -22.3% 2.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 762.7% -16.9% 126.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.9% -55.7% -40.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHPZNOGNBR
Gross margin 31.8% – 38.8%
EBITDA margin 20.7% – 23.9%
Operating margin 2.3% – 3.9%
Pretax margin -1.0% – 14.9%
Net margin -3.4% – 7.6%
FCF margin 7.9% – 1.2%
Operating cash flow margin 14.5% – 21.7%
Return on equity -4.8% -16.6% 33.9%
Return on assets -2.0% -15.2% 7.3%
Return on invested capital 2.0% – 2.7%
Return on capital employed 1.6% -16.3% 3.3%
Asset turnover 0.6x – 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.5x 1.0x 2.2x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% – 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHPZNOGNBR
Debt / assets 29.6% – 48.0%
Debt / equity 0.7x – 2.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0x – 2.1x
Debt / FCF 5.9x – 53.5x
Liabilities / assets 57.5% 9.2% 78.6%
Equity / assets 42.5% 90.8% 21.4%
Interest coverage 0.9x – 0.7x
Current ratio 2.0x 3.9x 1.9x
Quick ratio 1.4x 2.8x 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.3x 2.8x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 2.02 – 0.61

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHPZNOGNBR
Dividend yield 2.6% – –
Net buyback yield – -59.4% –
Shareholder yield 2.6% -59.4% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) -77.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 32.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -13.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -17.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHPZNOGNBR
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.40FY2026 – $-2.20FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -142.6%FY2026 – -112.7%FY2026
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.22BFY2026 – $3.26BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 – +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +5.4% – +6.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHPZNOGNBR
Held by institutions 100.0% – 76.0%
Institutions holding 376 – 242
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.3% – +8.5%
Institutions buying 176 – 146
Institutions selling 125 – 64
Buyers to sellers 1.41 – 2.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HPZNOGNBR
HP 1.00 0.18 0.77
ZNOG 0.18 1.00 0.15
NBR 0.77 0.15 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HP, ZNOG and NBR?

Helmerich & Payne (HP) is the largest by market capitalisation: Helmerich & Payne (HP) $3.88B, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) $427.90K, Nabors Industries (NBR) $1.35B.

Which company is growing faster?

Helmerich & Payne (HP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Helmerich & Payne (HP) +16.6%, Nabors Industries (NBR) +5.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Nabors Industries (NBR) has the highest net margin (Helmerich & Payne (HP) -3.4%, Nabors Industries (NBR) 7.6%). On return on invested capital, Nabors Industries (NBR) leads (Helmerich & Payne (HP) 2.0%, Nabors Industries (NBR) 2.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) returned the most: Helmerich & Payne (HP) +47.9%, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) +80.0%, Nabors Industries (NBR) +74.6%. Over five years, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) compounded fastest (Helmerich & Payne (HP) +3.1%/yr, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) +24.6%/yr, Nabors Industries (NBR) -3.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Helmerich & Payne (HP) 2.57%, Nabors Industries (NBR) 0.00%. Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) and Nabors Industries (NBR) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Helmerich & Payne (HP) has been the steadiest (Helmerich & Payne (HP) 44.2%, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) 71.4%, Nabors Industries (NBR) 50.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HP, ZNOG and NBR?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Helmerich & Payne (HP) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.