HP vs PTEN vs ZNOG Stock Comparison

Helmerich & Payne, Patterson Uti Energy and Zion Oil & Gas Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PDS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HP Helmerich & Payne, Inc.
$36.10 -10.0% 1M +38.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.49B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$4.00B
Div. yield
0.03%
Land Drilling Energy
3 wins
ZNOG Zion Oil & Gas Inc
$0.35 -16.7% 1M +84.2% 1Y
Market cap
$401.75K
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Oil and Gas Exploration and Production Energy
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Patterson Uti Energy leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Patterson Uti Energy 4, Helmerich & Payne 3, Zion Oil & Gas 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHPPTENZNOGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $3.49B $3.84B $401.75K PTEN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -25.5x -153.6x 0.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +16.6% +0.0% — HP
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -3.4% -0.5% — PTEN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 2.0% 1.0% — HP
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.0x 1.0x — PTEN
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.03% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +38.3% +77.2% +84.2% ZNOG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.0%/yr +2.6%/yr +20.1%/yr ZNOG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 44.4% 52.2% 71.1% HP
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 65/100 37/100 PTEN

Percentile Scorecard

HPPTENZNOG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHPPTENZNOG
Valuation 70 #15 of 47 78 #11 of 47 29 #70 of 98
Growth 42 #26 of 44 56 #20 of 44 42 #57 of 97
Profitability 23 #32 of 41 38 #26 of 41 15 #80 of 94
Financial Health 31 #32 of 46 56 #21 of 46 96 #5 of 101
Shareholder Returns 32 #22 of 32 97 #2 of 32 1 #77 of 78
Overall 39 65 37
  • HP ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • PTEN ranked among 48 companies in Oilfield Services and Equipment
  • ZNOG ranked among 103 companies in Oil and Gas Upstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHPPTENZNOGSPY
1 month -10.0%-7.8%-16.7% -1.0%
3 months +8.4%+11.6%-10.3% -0.4%
6 months -9.4%-8.0%-16.7% +4.5%
Year to date +25.9%+74.3%+59.1% +12.4%
1 year +38.3%+77.2%+84.2% +13.6%
3 years -12.7%-17.0%+483.3% +76.4%
3 years, per year -4.4%-6.0%+80.1% +20.8%
5 years +5.2%+13.8%+150.0% +63.7%
5 years, per year +1.0%+2.6%+20.1% +10.4%
10 years -42.2%-50.2%-71.1% +267.7%
10 years, per year -5.3%-6.7%-11.7% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureHPPTENZNOGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 44.4%52.2%71.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 45.8%55.3%78.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.12-0.510.48 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.861.481.18 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -71.9%-73.9%-91.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -24.2%-20.0%-46.2% -1.6%
52-week high $47.64$13.32$0.65 $779.14
52-week low $26.10$5.41$0.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHPPTENZNOG
P/E now vs peer median -26.3xmedian 23.0x -162.5xmedian 23.0x -0.1xmedian 10.7x
P/S now vs peer median 0.9xmedian 1.1x 0.8xmedian 1.1x —median 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 8.3x 5.4xmedian 8.3x 1.2xmedian 5.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 11.4xmedian 15.0x 15.2xmedian 15.0x 0.0xmedian 9.9x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 1.5x 1.3xmedian 1.5x 0.0xmedian 1.4x
PEG now vs peer median 0.80median 0.48 5.95median 0.48 0.00median 0.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHPPTENZNOG
Revenue $4.00B $4.84B –
Gross profit $1.27B $1.16B –
Operating income $89.92M $41.76M -$8.22M
Net income -$130.00M -$24.21M -$8.19M
Free cash flow $315.29M $265.98M -$17.64M
R&D $27.14M – –
EPS (diluted) $-1.37 $-0.06 $-0.01
Cash & equivalents $204.43M $339.31M $9.61M
Total debt $1.86B $1.23B –
Shares (diluted) 100.03M 384.36M 843.21M
Enterprise value $2.57B $2.54B -$38.59M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHPPTENZNOG
P/E -26.3x -162.5x -0.1x
P/FCF 11.4x 15.2x 0.0x
P/Operating cash flow 6.2x 4.9x 0.0x
P/S 0.9x 0.8x –
P/B 1.4x 1.3x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 1.7x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA 6.3x 5.4x 1.2x
EV/EBIT 58.3x 118.2x 1.1x
EV/Revenue 1.3x 1.0x –
EV/FCF 16.6x 18.6x 0.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.0x 6.0x 1.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.80 5.95 0.00

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHPPTENZNOG
Revenue growth (1Y) 16.6% 0.0% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 12.0% 13.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.7% -2.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 4.1% 0.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -20.0% 158.1% -14.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -45.2% -51.1% 46.9%
Net income growth (1Y) -340.3% 82.1% -15.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -32.4% -27.8% 46.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -341.3% 81.7% -15.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.9% -27.3% 54.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 14.8% -6.9% -46.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.7% -1.5% -22.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 762.7% -7.9% -16.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -5.9% -6.6% -55.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHPPTENZNOG
Gross margin 31.8% 24.1% –
EBITDA margin 20.7% 19.0% –
Operating margin 2.3% 0.9% –
Pretax margin -1.0% -0.5% –
Net margin -3.4% -0.5% –
FCF margin 7.9% 5.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 14.5% 16.9% –
Return on equity -4.8% -0.8% -16.6%
Return on assets -2.0% -0.4% -15.2%
Return on invested capital 2.0% 1.0% –
Return on capital employed 1.6% 0.9% -16.3%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.5x -33.8x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.9% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHPPTENZNOG
Debt / assets 29.6% 22.6% –
Debt / equity 0.7x 0.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.0x 1.0x –
Debt / FCF 5.9x 4.6x –
Liabilities / assets 57.5% 43.6% 9.2%
Equity / assets 42.5% 56.4% 90.8%
Interest coverage 0.9x 0.6x –
Current ratio 2.0x 1.7x 3.9x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.5x 2.8x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.4x 2.8x
Altman Z-score 1.98 1.72 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHPPTENZNOG
Dividend yield 2.8% 3.6% –
Net buyback yield – 0.8% -61.1%
Shareholder yield 2.8% 4.4% -61.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) -77.9% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 32.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) -13.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -17.3% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHPPTENZNOG
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.40FY2026 $0.00FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -142.6%FY2026 – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.22BFY2026 $4.72BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +12.6%FY2026 -2.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +5.4% +5.1% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHPPTENZNOG
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% –
Institutions holding 377 435 –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.3% +1.0% –
Institutions buying 177 258 –
Institutions selling 125 111 –
Buyers to sellers 1.42 2.32 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HPPTENZNOG
HP 1.00 0.78 0.18
PTEN 0.78 1.00 0.13
ZNOG 0.18 0.13 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HP, PTEN and ZNOG?

Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Helmerich & Payne (HP) $3.49B, Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) $3.84B, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) $401.75K.

Which company is growing faster?

Helmerich & Payne (HP) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Helmerich & Payne (HP) +16.6%, Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) +0.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) has the highest net margin (Helmerich & Payne (HP) -3.4%, Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) -0.5%). On return on invested capital, Helmerich & Payne (HP) leads (Helmerich & Payne (HP) 2.0%, Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) 1.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) returned the most: Helmerich & Payne (HP) +38.3%, Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) +77.2%, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) +84.2%. Over five years, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) compounded fastest (Helmerich & Payne (HP) +1.0%/yr, Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) +2.6%/yr, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) +20.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Helmerich & Payne (HP) 0.03%, Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) 0.00%, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) 0.00%. Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) and Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Helmerich & Payne (HP) has been the steadiest (Helmerich & Payne (HP) 44.4%, Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) 52.2%, Zion Oil & Gas (ZNOG) 71.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HP, PTEN and ZNOG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Patterson Uti Energy (PTEN) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.