HLF vs GWLL vs CFOO Stock Comparison

Herbalife, Goldenwell Biotech and China Foods Holdings Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BBWI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
HLF Herbalife Ltd.
$14.91 +18.6% 1M +80.9% 1Y
Market cap
$1.56B
P/E
8.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.28B
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
6 wins
GWLL Goldenwell Biotech, Inc.
$0.65 -5.8% 1M -89.2% 1Y
Market cap
$64.35M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$55.00
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
CFOO China Foods Holdings Ltd.
$1.05 0.0% 1M +59.1% 1Y
Market cap
$21.26M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$185.87K
Div. yield
–
Personal Care Products Consumer Staples
1 win

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Herbalife leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Herbalife 6, China Foods Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionHLFGWLLCFOOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.56B $64.35M $21.26M HLF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.7x -222.2x -65.8x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 6.1x — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +6.4% — -46.6% HLF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.4% -512,940.0% -173.8% HLF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 23.8% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +80.9% -89.2% +59.1% HLF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -19.2%/yr — -16.2%/yr CFOO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 59.3% 171.3% 75.4% HLF
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 60/100 14/100 16/100 HLF

Percentile Scorecard

HLFGWLLCFOO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisHLFGWLLCFOO
Valuation 100 #1 of 50 12 #44 of 50 8 #46 of 50
Growth 67 #17 of 49 33 #33 of 49 42 #29 of 49
Profitability 84 #8 of 45 0 #45 of 45 9 #41 of 45
Financial Health 25 #41 of 54 9 #49 of 54 6 #51 of 54
Shareholder Returns 24 #23 of 30 – –
Overall 60 14 16
  • HLF ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • GWLL ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products
  • CFOO ranked among 58 companies in Household and Personal Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodHLFGWLLCFOOSPY
1 month +18.6%-5.8%0.0% -5.9%
3 months +29.9%-15.6%+59.1% -4.6%
6 months +2.9%-35.0%+59.1% +0.2%
Year to date +15.7%-77.6%+59.1% +7.5%
1 year +80.9%-89.2%+59.1% +8.2%
3 years +8.2%+160.0%-58.0% +68.3%
3 years, per year +2.7%+37.5%-25.1% +19.0%
5 years -65.5%—-58.7% +56.5%
5 years, per year -19.2%—-16.2% +9.4%
10 years -45.7%—+4.0% +251.5%
10 years, per year -5.9%—+0.4% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureHLFGWLLCFOOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 59.3%171.3%75.4% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.3%488.4%— 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.090.360.03 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.37-0.520.78 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -88.7%-92.7%-74.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -25.3%-89.2%0.0% -5.9%
52-week high $19.96$6.00$1.05 $779.14
52-week low $8.24$0.51$0.66 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleHLFGWLLCFOO
P/E now vs peer median 8.7xmedian 17.9x -222.2xmedian 17.9x -65.8xmedian 17.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.3xmedian 1.7x 1,170,000xmedian 1.7x 114.4xmedian 1.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.8xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x -67.3xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 17.4x -583.1xmedian 17.4x -60.4xmedian 17.4x
P/B now vs peer median -3.8xmedian 1.9x -161.6xmedian 1.9x -15.0xmedian 1.9x
PEG now vs peer median -2.59median 0.62 —median 0.62 -5.30median 0.62

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsHLFGWLLCFOO
Revenue $5.28B $55.00 $185.87K
Gross profit $4.10B $12.00 $14.61K
Operating income $505.00M -$114.80K -$323.18K
Net income $176.90M -$282.12K -$323.11K
Free cash flow $337.10M -$110.37K -$352.34K
EPS (diluted) $1.68 $0.00 $-0.02
Cash & equivalents $409.20M $11.14K $15.92K
Total debt $1.93B – –
Shares (diluted) 107.30M 99.00M 20.25M
Enterprise value -$14.10M $64.25M $21.15M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricHLFGWLLCFOO
P/E 8.7x -222.2x -65.8x
P/FCF 4.6x -583.1x -60.4x
P/Operating cash flow 3.9x -583.1x -60.4x
P/S 0.3x 1,170,000x 114.4x
P/B -3.8x -161.6x -15.0x
P/Tangible book -2.1x -161.6x -15.0x
EV/EBITDA 4.8x – -67.3x
EV/EBIT 6.1x -560.4x -65.8x
EV/Revenue 0.6x 1,169,797x 114.3x
EV/FCF 9.1x -583.0x -60.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.8x -583.0x -60.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -2.59 – -5.30

Growth

14 metrics
MetricHLFGWLLCFOO
Revenue growth (1Y) 6.4% – -46.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 1.6% -89.3% -3.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 5.9% – -70.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 2.0% -92.0% 74.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 3.5% -3.5% 31.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 9.0% 51.2% 14.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -44.8% -136.4% 33.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -1.7% 36.6% 12.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -45.7% -130.2% 33.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -3.4% – 12.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 30.1% -474.5% 17.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 8.0% 51.4% -20.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 55.3% -474.5% 20.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 25.0% 51.4% -20.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricHLFGWLLCFOO
Gross margin 77.6% 21.8% 7.9%
EBITDA margin 12.1% – -169.8%
Operating margin 9.6% -208,729% -173.9%
Pretax margin 4.6% -220,184% -173.8%
Net margin 3.4% -512,940% -173.8%
FCF margin 6.4% -200,664% -189.6%
Operating cash flow margin 7.5% -200,664% -189.6%
Return on equity – – –
Return on assets 6.2% -441.1% -152.0%
Return on invested capital 23.8% – –
Return on capital employed 27.4% – –
Asset turnover 1.8x 0.0x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.2x 0.4x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricHLFGWLLCFOO
Debt / assets 66.8% – –
Debt / equity -4.7x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x – –
Debt / FCF 5.7x – –
Liabilities / assets 114.2% 1,474% 756.1%
Equity / assets -14.2% -1,374% -656.1%
Interest coverage 2.9x – –
Current ratio 1.2x – 0.1x
Quick ratio 0.5x 0.1x 0.0x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 2.54 – -21.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricHLFGWLLCFOO
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 0.7% – –
Shareholder yield 0.7% – –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusHLFGWLLCFOO
Forward P/E 6.1xFY2026 – –
EPS, next fiscal year $2.46FY2026 – –
EPS growth, next FY +16.0%FY2026 – –
EPS growth, the year after +29.3% – –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.62BFY2026 – –
Revenue growth, next FY +11.6%FY2026 – –
Revenue growth, the year after -9.8% – –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersHLFGWLLCFOO
Held by institutions 99.1% – –
Institutions holding 235 – –
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% – –
Institutions buying 129 – –
Institutions selling 72 – –
Buyers to sellers 1.79 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

HLFGWLLCFOO
HLF 1.00 -0.05 0.02
GWLL -0.05 1.00 0.00
CFOO 0.02 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, HLF, GWLL and CFOO?

Herbalife (HLF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Herbalife (HLF) $1.56B, Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) $64.35M, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) $21.26M.

Which company is growing faster?

Herbalife (HLF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Herbalife (HLF) +6.4%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -46.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Herbalife (HLF) has the highest net margin (Herbalife (HLF) 3.4%, Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) -512,940.0%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -173.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Herbalife (HLF) returned the most: Herbalife (HLF) +80.9%, Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) -89.2%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) +59.1%. Over five years, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) compounded fastest (Herbalife (HLF) -19.2%/yr, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) -16.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Herbalife (HLF) has been the steadiest (Herbalife (HLF) 59.3%, Goldenwell Biotech (GWLL) 171.3%, China Foods Holdings (CFOO) 75.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, HLF, GWLL and CFOO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Herbalife (HLF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.