GTMAY vs OMAB vs PK Stock Comparison

Grupo Tmm Sab, Central North Airport and Park Hotels & Resorts Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GTMAY Grupo Tmm Sab
$3.28 +19.3% 1M +152.3% 1Y
Market cap
$572.53M
P/E
35.4x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Marine Shipping Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

7 decided of 12

Central North Airport leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Central North Airport 3, Grupo Tmm Sab 3, Park Hotels & Resorts 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGTMAYOMABPKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $572.53M $4.91B $3.36B OMAB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 35.4x 16.0x -20.6x OMAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 4.6x 14.9x 33.9x GTMAY
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — -1.4% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -6.4% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 0.7% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 10.9x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +152.3% -4.2% +50.4% GTMAY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +40.5%/yr +15.2%/yr -2.1%/yr GTMAY
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 920.4% 31.1% 30.6% PK
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 46/100 41/100 OMAB

Percentile Scorecard

GTMAYOMABPK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGTMAYOMABPK
Valuation 6 #128 of 136 30 #96 of 136 68 #47 of 145
Growth – – 3 #138 of 142
Profitability – – 24 #103 of 135
Financial Health 56 #64 of 143 35 #94 of 143 27 #99 of 136
Shareholder Returns – 75 #21 of 81 82 #24 of 131
Overall – 46 41
  • GTMAY ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • OMAB ranked among 150 companies in Transportation
  • PK ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGTMAYOMABPKSPY
1 month +19.3%-3.6%+5.8% +0.9%
3 months +19.3%-7.6%+8.6% +5.9%
6 months -6.0%-7.4%+46.6% +8.5%
Year to date +143.0%-9.7%+59.0% +13.3%
1 year +152.3%-4.2%+50.4% +12.4%
3 years +583.3%+73.1%+49.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +89.8%+20.1%+14.4% +23.5%
5 years +446.7%+103.0%-10.3% +68.2%
5 years, per year +40.5%+15.2%-2.1% +11.0%
10 years +71.7%+108.9%— +263.4%
10 years, per year +5.6%+7.6%— +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGTMAYOMABPKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 920.4%31.1%30.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 2,260.3%28.0%27.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.741.120.77 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.17-0.141.65 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.5%-42.1%-58.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -6.0%-27.2%-2.1% -0.9%
52-week high $3.49$134.98$16.99 $779.14
52-week low $0.01$88.75$9.84 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGTMAYOMABPK
P/E now vs peer median 35.4xmedian 16.1x 16.0xmedian 16.1x -20.4xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 0.9x 5.3xmedian 0.9x 1.3xmedian 4.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 8.6x —median 8.6x 20.8xmedian 14.2x
P/FCF now vs peer median -31.7xmedian 11.6x 11.7xmedian 11.6x 41.3xmedian 23.0x
P/B now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 1.2x 7.5xmedian 1.2x 1.1xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.80 —median 0.80 0.38median 1.91

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGTMAYOMABPK
Revenue – – $2.54B
Gross profit – – $756.00M
Operating income – – $52.00M
Net income – – -$159.00M
Free cash flow – – $81.00M
EPS (diluted) – – $-0.82
Cash & equivalents $27.51M $172.32M $264.00M
Total debt $90.00M $746.90M $3.92B
Shares (diluted) – – 200.00M
Enterprise value $524.31M $4.40B $2.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGTMAYOMABPK
P/E 35.4x 16.0x -20.4x
P/FCF -31.7x 11.7x 41.3x
P/Operating cash flow – – 8.3x
P/S 5.8x 5.3x 1.3x
P/B 4.3x 7.5x 1.1x
P/Tangible book 4.5x -9.6x 1.1x
EV/EBITDA – – 20.8x
EV/EBIT – – 134.6x
EV/Revenue – – 2.8x
EV/FCF – – 86.4x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 17.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.38

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGTMAYOMABPK
Revenue growth (1Y) – – -1.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – -1.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 1.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – -0.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) – – -79.2%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – -31.0%
Net income growth (1Y) – – -333.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – -61.1%
EPS growth (1Y) – – -379.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – -54.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -2.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -4.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -56.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – -29.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGTMAYOMABPK
Gross margin – – 29.8%
EBITDA margin – – 13.2%
Operating margin – – 2.0%
Pretax margin – – -5.7%
Net margin – – -6.4%
FCF margin – – 3.2%
Operating cash flow margin – – 15.9%
Return on equity – – -5.1%
Return on assets – – -2.0%
Return on invested capital – – 0.7%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover – – 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – -2.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGTMAYOMABPK
Debt / assets 23.0% 43.4% 50.8%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.2x 1.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 10.9x
Debt / FCF – – 48.3x
Liabilities / assets 47.5% 63.1% 59.9%
Equity / assets 52.5% 36.9% 40.1%
Interest coverage – – 0.3x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.3x –
Quick ratio 1.0x 1.2x –
Cash ratio 0.5x 0.7x –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGTMAYOMABPK
Dividend yield – 5.5% 6.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 5.5% 6.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGTMAYOMABPK
Forward P/E 4.6xFY2023 14.9xFY2026 33.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.72FY2023 $6.60FY2026 $0.49FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +3.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +28.5% +12.2%
Revenue, next fiscal year $97.26MFY2023 $933.64MFY2026 $2.42BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +1.1%FY2026 -4.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.6% +2.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGTMAYOMABPK
Held by institutions – 12.3% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 163 397
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.4% +9.7%
Institutions buying – 77 218
Institutions selling – 59 114
Buyers to sellers – 1.31 1.91

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GTMAYOMABPK
GTMAY 1.00 0.04 0.06
OMAB 0.04 1.00 0.27
PK 0.06 0.27 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GTMAY, OMAB and PK?

Central North Airport (OMAB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) $572.53M, Central North Airport (OMAB) $4.91B, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) $3.36B.

Which stock is cheaper, GTMAY, OMAB and PK?

Central North Airport (OMAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 35.4x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 16.0x, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -20.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) is cheapest (Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 4.6x, Central North Airport (OMAB) 14.9x, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 33.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) returned the most: Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) +152.3%, Central North Airport (OMAB) -4.2%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) +50.4%. Over five years, Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) compounded fastest (Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) +40.5%/yr, Central North Airport (OMAB) +15.2%/yr, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) -2.1%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) has been the steadiest (Grupo Tmm Sab (GTMAY) 920.4%, Central North Airport (OMAB) 31.1%, Park Hotels & Resorts (PK) 30.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GTMAY, OMAB and PK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Central North Airport (OMAB) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.