GSM vs MTRN vs SND Stock Comparison

Ferroglobe, Materion and Smart Sand Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ALM) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GSM Ferroglobe PLC
$2.93 -33.1% 1M -34.9% 1Y
Market cap
$547.50M
P/E
18.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.43B
Div. yield
1.50%
Copper Basic Materials
1 win
MTRN MATERION Corp
$187.29 -41.5% 1M +68.0% 1Y
Market cap
$3.90B
P/E
43.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.10B
Div. yield
0.30%
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
5 wins
SND Smart Sand, Inc.
$4.37 -18.3% 1M +104.2% 1Y
Market cap
$170.25M
P/E
16.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$386.99M
Div. yield
5.72%
Industrial Minerals Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Materion leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Materion 5, Smart Sand 5, Ferroglobe 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGSMMTRNSNDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $547.50M $3.90B $170.25M MTRN
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 18.2x 43.3x 16.4x SND
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 25.2x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.8% +21.6% +26.5% SND
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.1% 4.3% 2.7% MTRN
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.9% 8.1% 3.1% MTRN
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 2.1x 0.1x GSM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.50% 0.30% 5.72% SND
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.9% +68.0% +104.2% SND
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.8%/yr +14.8%/yr +13.6%/yr MTRN
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.5% 63.9% 71.2% MTRN
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 49/100 73/100 SND

Percentile Scorecard

GSMMTRNSND

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGSMMTRNSND
Valuation 95 #9 of 168 60 #68 of 168 96 #8 of 168
Growth 34 #101 of 152 54 #70 of 152 76 #38 of 152
Profitability 52 #60 of 123 54 #57 of 123 56 #55 of 123
Financial Health 54 #77 of 165 24 #125 of 165 44 #93 of 165
Shareholder Returns 80 #24 of 117 53 #55 of 117 96 #6 of 117
Overall 63 49 73
  • GSM ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • MTRN ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SND ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGSMMTRNSNDSPY
1 month -33.1%-41.5%-18.3% -1.0%
3 months -29.4%-37.0%+4.5% -0.4%
6 months -38.1%-4.9%-11.7% +4.5%
Year to date -36.9%+50.7%+9.3% +12.4%
1 year -34.9%+68.0%+104.2% +13.6%
3 years -37.7%+68.3%+102.3% +76.4%
3 years, per year -14.6%+19.0%+26.5% +20.8%
5 years -57.5%+99.5%+89.2% +63.7%
5 years, per year -15.8%+14.8%+13.6% +10.4%
10 years -67.3%+499.3%-60.2% +267.7%
10 years, per year -10.6%+19.6%-8.8% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureGSMMTRNSNDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.5%63.9%71.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 69.6%68.1%81.5% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.052.01-0.14 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.541.061.46 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.7%-48.1%-70.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.2%-41.5%-24.9% -1.6%
52-week high $5.45$320.08$5.82 $779.14
52-week low $2.93$111.50$2.09 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGSMMTRNSND
P/E now vs peer median 18.2xmedian 13.4x 43.3xmedian 13.4x 16.4xmedian 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 3.0x 1.9xmedian 3.0x 0.4xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 7.7x 21.7xmedian 7.7x 4.5xmedian 7.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 13.3x 66.4xmedian 13.3x 4.9xmedian 13.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.3x 3.9xmedian 2.3x 0.7xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.56median 0.19 -13.69median 0.19 2.60median 0.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGSMMTRNSND
Revenue $1.43B $2.10B $386.99M
Gross profit – $335.97M $52.09M
Operating income $22.93M $125.67M $7.85M
Net income $25.66M $90.12M $10.49M
Free cash flow $38.78M $58.73M $34.63M
R&D – $25.74M –
EPS (diluted) $0.16 $4.28 $0.25
Cash & equivalents $93.13M $19.99M $10.20M
Total debt $58.99M $440.69M $14.66M
Shares (diluted) 188.36M 21.08M 41.37M
Enterprise value $104.42M $3.84B $112.96M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGSMMTRNSND
P/E 18.2x 43.3x 16.4x
P/FCF 14.1x 66.4x 4.9x
P/Operating cash flow 10.3x 36.0x 3.6x
P/S 0.4x 1.9x 0.4x
P/B 0.7x 3.9x 0.7x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 4.4x 0.7x
EV/EBITDA 4.2x 21.7x 4.5x
EV/EBIT 22.4x 34.4x 22.3x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 2.1x 0.5x
EV/FCF 13.2x 73.6x 5.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.7x 39.9x 3.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.56 -13.69 2.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGSMMTRNSND
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.8% 21.6% 26.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.1% 7.2% 8.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 1.0% 64.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -2.4% 3.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 123.3% 120.8% 193.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -52.4% -3.7% 4.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 121.3% 453.5% 1,206%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -39.3% -2.9% 9.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 125.8% 447.1% 1,143%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.7% -3.2% 6.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -39.7% -26.2% 350.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -41.4% -13.1% 7.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -23.7% -36.0% 16,392%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -42.4% -1.8% 18.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGSMMTRNSND
Gross margin – 16.0% 13.5%
EBITDA margin 8.5% 9.5% 10.0%
Operating margin 1.6% 6.0% 2.0%
Pretax margin 1.4% 4.6% 1.9%
Net margin 2.1% 4.3% 2.7%
FCF margin 2.7% 2.8% 8.9%
Operating cash flow margin 3.7% 5.2% 12.1%
Return on equity 3.4% 9.2% 4.4%
Return on assets 1.6% 4.8% 3.1%
Return on invested capital 1.9% 8.1% 3.1%
Return on capital employed 1.5% 8.0% 2.7%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.1x 1.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.2x 4.5x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.7% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGSMMTRNSND
Debt / assets 3.7% 23.6% 4.2%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.4x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 2.1x 0.1x
Debt / FCF 1.5x 7.5x 0.4x
Liabilities / assets 50.7% 46.8% 31.4%
Equity / assets 49.3% 53.2% 68.6%
Interest coverage 1.0x 4.1x –
Current ratio 8.7x 2.9x 1.7x
Quick ratio 4.7x 1.1x 1.0x
Cash ratio 1.1x 0.1x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 5.11 2.54

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGSMMTRNSND
Dividend yield 1.5% 0.3% 5.7%
Net buyback yield -0.4% – 0.9%
Shareholder yield 1.1% 0.3% 6.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 13.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 20.0% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.8% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 4.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGSMMTRNSND
Forward P/E – 25.2xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.05FY2026 $7.43FY2026 $-0.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +36.6%FY2026 -1,000.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +18.8% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.43BFY2026 $2.50BFY2026 $380.19MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.6%FY2026 +39.7%FY2026 +15.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +32.0% +8.4% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGSMMTRNSND
Held by institutions 55.9% 97.0% 49.7%
Institutions holding 174 404 91
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +3.3% +12.9%
Institutions buying 94 238 69
Institutions selling 58 121 17
Buyers to sellers 1.62 1.97 4.06

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GSMMTRNSND
GSM 1.00 0.50 0.05
MTRN 0.50 1.00 0.07
SND 0.05 0.07 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GSM, MTRN and SND?

Materion (MTRN) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferroglobe (GSM) $547.50M, Materion (MTRN) $3.90B, Smart Sand (SND) $170.25M.

Which stock is cheaper, GSM, MTRN and SND?

Smart Sand (SND) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferroglobe (GSM) 18.2x, Materion (MTRN) 43.3x, Smart Sand (SND) 16.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Smart Sand (SND) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ferroglobe (GSM) +3.8%, Materion (MTRN) +21.6%, Smart Sand (SND) +26.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Materion (MTRN) has the highest net margin (Ferroglobe (GSM) 2.1%, Materion (MTRN) 4.3%, Smart Sand (SND) 2.7%). On return on invested capital, Materion (MTRN) leads (Ferroglobe (GSM) 1.9%, Materion (MTRN) 8.1%, Smart Sand (SND) 3.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Smart Sand (SND) returned the most: Ferroglobe (GSM) -34.9%, Materion (MTRN) +68.0%, Smart Sand (SND) +104.2%. Over five years, Materion (MTRN) compounded fastest (Ferroglobe (GSM) -15.8%/yr, Materion (MTRN) +14.8%/yr, Smart Sand (SND) +13.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Smart Sand (SND) has the highest dividend yield: Ferroglobe (GSM) 1.50%, Materion (MTRN) 0.30%, Smart Sand (SND) 5.72%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Materion (MTRN) has been the steadiest (Ferroglobe (GSM) 64.5%, Materion (MTRN) 63.9%, Smart Sand (SND) 71.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GSM, MTRN and SND?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Materion (MTRN) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.