GSM vs HBM vs SCCO Stock Comparison

Ferroglobe, Hudbay Minerals and Southern Copper Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SLSR) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GSM Ferroglobe PLC
$2.93 -33.1% 1M -34.9% 1Y
Market cap
$510.46M
P/E
16.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.43B
Div. yield
–
Copper Basic Materials
1 win
HBM Hudbay Minerals Inc.
$22.23 -18.5% 1M +49.7% 1Y
Market cap
$8.28B
P/E
12.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.47B
Div. yield
0.00%
Copper Basic Materials
6 wins
SCCO Southern Copper Corp/
$176.87 -13.9% 1M +38.9% 1Y
Market cap
$140.65B
P/E
22.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.11B
Div. yield
0.02%
Copper Basic Materials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Hudbay Minerals leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Hudbay Minerals 6, Southern Copper 4, Ferroglobe 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGSMHBMSCCOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $510.46M $8.28B $140.65B SCCO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 16.8x 12.1x 22.1x HBM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 15.0x 23.6x HBM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.8% +12.1% +38.7% SCCO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.1% 27.7% 37.2% SCCO
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.9% 12.6% — HBM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 0.1x 0.0x GSM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.9% +49.7% +38.9% HBM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -15.8%/yr +26.8%/yr +26.3%/yr HBM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 64.5% 62.8% 52.5% SCCO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 63/100 73/100 64/100 HBM

Percentile Scorecard

GSMHBMSCCO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGSMHBMSCCO
Valuation 95 #9 of 168 86 #25 of 168 47 #89 of 168
Growth 34 #101 of 152 89 #17 of 152 72 #44 of 152
Profitability 52 #60 of 123 89 #15 of 123 98 #4 of 123
Financial Health 54 #77 of 165 51 #82 of 165 48 #87 of 165
Shareholder Returns 80 #24 of 117 50 #59 of 117 58 #50 of 117
Overall 63 73 64
  • GSM ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • HBM ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining
  • SCCO ranked among 177 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGSMHBMSCCOSPY
1 month -33.1%-18.5%-13.9% -1.0%
3 months -29.4%-14.2%-10.2% -0.4%
6 months -38.1%-7.4%-2.9% +4.5%
Year to date -36.9%+12.0%+25.6% +12.4%
1 year -34.9%+49.7%+38.9% +13.6%
3 years -37.7%+376.0%+157.0% +76.4%
3 years, per year -14.6%+68.3%+37.0% +20.8%
5 years -57.5%+226.9%+221.3% +63.7%
5 years, per year -15.8%+26.8%+26.3% +10.4%
10 years -67.3%+405.2%+598.4% +267.7%
10 years, per year -10.6%+17.6%+21.5% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureGSMHBMSCCOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 64.5%62.8%52.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 69.6%67.6%53.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.052.752.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.540.790.74 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -68.7%-63.3%-45.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -46.2%-30.2%-19.5% -1.6%
52-week high $5.45$31.87$219.70 $779.14
52-week low $2.93$14.58$117.83 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGSMHBMSCCO
P/E now vs peer median 18.2xmedian 13.4x 12.9xmedian 13.4x 23.1xmedian 13.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 3.0x 3.6xmedian 3.0x 8.7xmedian 3.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 4.2xmedian 7.7x 5.9xmedian 7.7x 13.6xmedian 7.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 13.3x 10.0xmedian 13.3x 26.7xmedian 13.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.7xmedian 2.3x 1.8xmedian 2.3x 11.0xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -0.56median 0.19 0.04median 0.19 0.82median 0.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGSMHBMSCCO
Revenue $1.43B $2.47B $17.11B
Gross profit – $972.40M $11.15B
Operating income $22.93M $1.10B $10.03B
Net income $25.66M $680.00M $6.38B
Free cash flow $38.78M $880.20M $5.60B
R&D – $58.40M $58.60M
EPS (diluted) $0.16 $1.72 $7.67
Cash & equivalents $93.13M $890.90M $4.82B
Total debt $58.99M $1.13B $8.00B
Shares (diluted) 188.36M 396.65M 829.10M
Enterprise value $67.37M $5.13B $115.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGSMHBMSCCO
P/E 18.2x 12.9x 23.1x
P/FCF 14.1x 10.0x 26.7x
P/Operating cash flow 10.3x 10.0x 20.2x
P/S 0.4x 3.6x 8.7x
P/B 0.7x 1.8x 11.0x
P/Tangible book 0.9x 1.8x 11.0x
EV/EBITDA 4.2x 5.9x 13.6x
EV/EBIT 22.4x 8.1x 14.9x
EV/Revenue 0.4x 3.6x 8.7x
EV/FCF 13.2x 10.2x 26.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.7x 10.2x 20.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -0.56 0.04 0.82

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGSMHBMSCCO
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.8% 12.1% 38.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -6.1% 24.6% 18.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 32.8% 54.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 71.9% 25.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 123.3% 89.3% 61.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -52.4% 126.5% 28.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 121.3% 139.9% 66.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -39.3% 410.6% 30.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 125.8% 122.6% 65.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -32.7% 346.8% 28.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -39.7% 1.5% 60.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -41.4% – 21.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -23.7% 2,912% 60.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -42.4% 115.3% 22.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGSMHBMSCCO
Gross margin – 39.4% 65.2%
EBITDA margin 8.5% 61.9% 64.0%
Operating margin 1.6% 44.7% 58.6%
Pretax margin 1.4% 47.3% 57.6%
Net margin 2.1% 27.7% 37.2%
FCF margin 2.7% 35.7% 32.7%
Operating cash flow margin 3.7% 35.6% 43.3%
Return on equity 3.4% 16.3% 48.5%
Return on assets 1.6% 43.1% 25.6%
Return on invested capital 1.9% 12.6% –
Return on capital employed 1.5% – 45.3%
Asset turnover 0.9x 1.6x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.3x 1.2x
Stock comp / revenue – 3.3% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGSMHBMSCCO
Debt / assets 3.7% 78.4% 31.2%
Debt / equity 0.1x 0.2x 0.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -0.3x 0.1x 0.0x
Debt / FCF 1.5x 1.3x 1.4x
Liabilities / assets 50.7% -231.7% 46.9%
Equity / assets 49.3% 331.7% 53.1%
Interest coverage 1.0x 14.9x –
Current ratio 8.7x – 4.3x
Quick ratio 4.7x – 3.8x
Cash ratio 1.1x – 2.9x
Altman Z-score – – 10.05

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGSMHBMSCCO
Dividend yield 1.5% 0.1% 2.4%
Net buyback yield -0.4% -0.4% –
Shareholder yield 1.1% -0.2% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 1.3% 51.7%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 1.0% 58.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -260.4% 43.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -59.0% 6.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGSMHBMSCCO
Forward P/E – 15.0xFY2026 23.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.05FY2026 $1.48FY2026 $7.51FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +120.9%FY2026 +47.8%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +27.7% +7.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.43BFY2026 $3.05BFY2026 $16.86BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +6.6%FY2026 +37.8%FY2026 +25.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +32.0% +18.9% +3.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGSMHBMSCCO
Held by institutions 55.9% 83.1% 9.2%
Institutions holding 174 319 859
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.6% +10.9% +0.7%
Institutions buying 94 200 601
Institutions selling 58 82 220
Buyers to sellers 1.62 2.44 2.73

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GSMHBMSCCO
GSM 1.00 0.27 0.32
HBM 0.27 1.00 0.85
SCCO 0.32 0.85 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GSM, HBM and SCCO?

Southern Copper (SCCO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Ferroglobe (GSM) $510.46M, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) $8.28B, Southern Copper (SCCO) $140.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, GSM, HBM and SCCO?

Hudbay Minerals (HBM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Ferroglobe (GSM) 16.8x, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 12.1x, Southern Copper (SCCO) 22.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) is cheapest (Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 15.0x, Southern Copper (SCCO) 23.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Southern Copper (SCCO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Ferroglobe (GSM) +3.8%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +12.1%, Southern Copper (SCCO) +38.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Southern Copper (SCCO) has the highest net margin (Ferroglobe (GSM) 2.1%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 27.7%, Southern Copper (SCCO) 37.2%). On return on invested capital, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) leads (Ferroglobe (GSM) 1.9%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 12.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Hudbay Minerals (HBM) returned the most: Ferroglobe (GSM) -34.9%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +49.7%, Southern Copper (SCCO) +38.9%. Over five years, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) compounded fastest (Ferroglobe (GSM) -15.8%/yr, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) +26.8%/yr, Southern Copper (SCCO) +26.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ferroglobe (GSM) 0.00%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 0.00%, Southern Copper (SCCO) 0.02%. Ferroglobe (GSM) and Hudbay Minerals (HBM) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Southern Copper (SCCO) has been the steadiest (Ferroglobe (GSM) 64.5%, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) 62.8%, Southern Copper (SCCO) 52.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GSM, HBM and SCCO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Hudbay Minerals (HBM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.