GS vs WFC vs TD Stock Comparison

Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo & Company and Toronto Dominion Bank Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$926.20 +1.1% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$269.93B
P/E
13.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
1.94%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$83.74 +3.6% 1M -3.6% 1Y
Market cap
$251.37B
P/E
11.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
2.21%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins
TD Toronto Dominion Bank
$126.44 +5.7% 1M +52.9% 1Y
Market cap
$213.62B
P/E
19.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$46.75B
Div. yield
3.48%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Wells Fargo & Company leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Wells Fargo & Company 4, Goldman Sachs 3, Toronto Dominion Bank 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGSWFCTDLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $269.93B $251.37B $213.62B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 13.0x 11.5x 19.4x WFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.3x 10.7x 18.5x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.7% +5.4% -3.6% GS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 25.2% 24.1% WFC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 15.1% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 2.8x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.94% 2.21% 3.48% TD
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +16.9% -3.6% +52.9% TD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.5%/yr +10.4%/yr +11.8%/yr GS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.9% 25.6% 18.2% TD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 51/100 22/100 WFC

Percentile Scorecard

GSWFCTD

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGSWFCTD
Valuation 16 #302 of 361 47 #193 of 361 13 #316 of 361
Growth 97 #6 of 172 52 #84 of 172 35 #112 of 172
Profitability – 65 #53 of 149 10 #135 of 149
Financial Health – 12 #140 of 158 1 #156 of 158
Shareholder Returns 28 #243 of 338 79 #71 of 338 50 #168 of 338
Overall 47 51 22
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • TD ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGSWFCTDSPY
1 month +1.1%+3.6%+5.7% +0.9%
3 months -5.6%-0.2%+8.1% +5.9%
6 months +2.3%+2.7%+21.2% +8.5%
Year to date +5.4%-10.2%+34.2% +13.3%
1 year +16.9%-3.6%+52.9% +12.4%
3 years +219.5%+116.0%+130.3% +88.1%
3 years, per year +47.3%+29.3%+32.1% +23.5%
5 years +124.1%+63.7%+74.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year +17.5%+10.4%+11.8% +11.0%
10 years +422.9%+81.1%+179.5% +263.4%
10 years, per year +18.0%+6.1%+10.8% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGSWFCTDSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.9%25.6%18.2% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.2%29.1%19.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.630.670.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.53-0.142.90 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.0%-38.7%-39.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.6%-13.1%0.0% -0.9%
52-week high $1,152.07$96.39$126.44 $779.14
52-week low $773.70$73.42$80.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGSWFCTD
P/E now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 12.1x 11.5xmedian 12.1x 19.4xmedian 12.1x
P/S now vs peer median 3.9xmedian 3.4x 2.9xmedian 3.4x 4.6xmedian 3.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 5.1x 6.0xmedian 5.1x 10.4xmedian 5.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.4xmedian 10.8x 8.7xmedian 10.8x 38.5xmedian 10.8x
P/B now vs peer median 2.2xmedian 1.2x 1.4xmedian 1.2x 2.4xmedian 1.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.26median 1.32 0.80median 1.32 4.60median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGSWFCTD
Revenue $69.70B $87.23B $46.75B
Operating income – – $3.46B
Net income – $22.97B $11.69B
Free cash flow – $28.91B $5.55B
EPS (diluted) $69.89 $7.20 $6.52
Cash & equivalents $177.00B – $4.86B
Total debt – $221.04B –
Shares (diluted) 304.90M 3.05B 1.73B
Enterprise value $269.93B $253.49B -$462.26B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGSWFCTD
P/E 13.0x 11.5x 19.4x
P/FCF -6.4x 8.7x 38.5x
P/Operating cash flow – 8.7x 38.5x
P/S 3.9x 2.9x 4.6x
P/B 2.2x 1.4x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 2.2x 1.4x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA – 6.0x 10.4x
EV/EBIT – 6.7x 15.3x
EV/Revenue 3.9x 5.4x 1.1x
EV/FCF – 16.3x 9.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – 16.3x 9.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.26 0.80 4.60

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGSWFCTD
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.7% 5.4% -3.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.3% 2.0% 5.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – 17.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – 47.6%
Net income growth (1Y) – 9.1% -21.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 6.8% 2.7%
EPS growth (1Y) 39.0% 16.2% -20.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 49.3% 14.4% 4.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 303.3% -64.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.6% 28.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 303.3% -64.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -0.6% 28.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGSWFCTD
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin – 89.8% 10.9%
Operating margin – – 7.4%
Pretax margin – 31.7% -66.0%
Net margin – 25.2% 24.1%
FCF margin – 33.1% 11.9%
Operating cash flow margin – 33.1% 11.9%
Return on equity – 12.9% 12.9%
Return on assets – 1.0% 0.8%
Return on invested capital – 15.1% –
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.3x 0.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGSWFCTD
Debt / assets – 9.8% –
Debt / equity – 1.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 2.8x –
Debt / FCF – 7.6x –
Liabilities / assets 94.3% 92.1% 94.0%
Equity / assets 5.7% 7.9% 6.0%
Interest coverage – 1.6x 0.1x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGSWFCTD
Dividend yield 1.9% 2.2% 3.5%
Net buyback yield – 5.6% 2.4%
Shareholder yield 1.9% 7.8% 5.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 24.6% 48.3%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 19.6% 101.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 5.6% 4.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 6.7% 6.8%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGSWFCTD
Forward P/E 12.3xFY2026 10.7xFY2026 18.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $75.07FY2026 $7.82FY2026 $6.83FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +46.3%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026 +14.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -6.8% +7.3% +9.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $68.80BFY2026 $94.32BFY2026 $45.67BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.1%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026 +14.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.5% +4.3% +3.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGSWFCTD
Held by institutions 72.1% 76.8% 45.9%
Institutions holding 3,150 2,878 900
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.1% +1.1% -1.2%
Institutions buying 1,553 1,293 385
Institutions selling 1,124 1,134 304
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.14 1.27

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GSWFCTD
GS 1.00 0.44 0.54
WFC 0.44 1.00 0.47
TD 0.54 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GS, WFC and TD?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Goldman Sachs (GS) $269.93B, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $251.37B, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) $213.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, GS, WFC and TD?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.0x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 11.5x, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 19.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.3x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 10.7x, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 18.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Goldman Sachs (GS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) -3.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has the highest net margin (Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.2%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 24.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) returned the most: Goldman Sachs (GS) +16.9%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) -3.6%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) +52.9%. Over five years, Goldman Sachs (GS) compounded fastest (Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.5%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +10.4%/yr, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) +11.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) has the highest dividend yield: Goldman Sachs (GS) 1.94%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 2.21%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 3.48%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) has been the steadiest (Goldman Sachs (GS) 31.9%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.6%, Toronto Dominion Bank (TD) 18.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GS, WFC and TD?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.