GS vs VBNK vs WFC Stock Comparison

Goldman Sachs, VersaBank and Wells Fargo & Company Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AXP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GS Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$928.20 +3.9% 1M +17.4% 1Y
Market cap
$267.88B
P/E
12.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$69.70B
Div. yield
1.94%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
4 wins
VBNK VersaBank
$22.95 +2.6% 1M +97.2% 1Y
Market cap
$733.15M
P/E
29.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$107.38M
Div. yield
0.47%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
3 wins
WFC Wells Fargo & Company/Mn
$87.44 +7.4% 1M +0.4% 1Y
Market cap
$262.48B
P/E
12.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$87.23B
Div. yield
2.12%
Money Center Banks Financial Services
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Wells Fargo & Company leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Wells Fargo & Company 5, Goldman Sachs 4, VersaBank 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGSVBNKWFCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $267.88B $733.15M $262.48B GS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 12.9x 29.6x 12.0x WFC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 12.4x 19.1x 11.2x WFC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.7% +28.2% +5.4% VBNK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 30.6% 22.8% 25.2% GS
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 13.9% 25.0% 15.1% VBNK
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -5.6x — 2.8x GS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 1.94% 0.47% 2.12% WFC
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +17.4% +97.2% +0.4% VBNK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +17.9%/yr +13.0%/yr +11.6%/yr GS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.3% 39.5% 25.9% WFC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 13/100 46/100 WFC

Percentile Scorecard

GSVBNKWFC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGSVBNKWFC
Valuation 15 #306 of 360 6 #339 of 360 38 #223 of 360
Growth 50 #171 of 344 9 #314 of 344 51 #169 of 344
Profitability 16 #289 of 345 15 #292 of 345 54 #161 of 345
Financial Health 12 #298 of 339 23 #262 of 339 6 #318 of 339
Shareholder Returns 87 #47 of 352 13 #306 of 352 79 #75 of 352
Overall 36 13 46
  • GS ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • VBNK ranked among 368 companies in Banking
  • WFC ranked among 368 companies in Banking

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGSVBNKWFCSPY
1 month +3.9%+2.6%+7.4% -1.0%
3 months -12.5%+18.5%-1.9% -0.4%
6 months -1.0%+24.5%+8.7% +4.5%
Year to date +5.6%+53.2%-6.2% +12.4%
1 year +17.4%+97.2%+0.4% +13.6%
3 years +183.3%+199.6%+110.1% +76.4%
3 years, per year +41.5%+44.2%+28.1% +20.8%
5 years +128.0%+84.2%+73.4% +63.7%
5 years, per year +17.9%+13.0%+11.6% +10.4%
10 years +427.6%—+96.1% +267.7%
10 years, per year +18.1%—+7.0% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureGSVBNKWFCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.3%39.5%25.9% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 32.8%35.3%29.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.680.800.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.542.460.01 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -31.5%-51.4%-38.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -19.4%-3.2%-9.3% -1.6%
52-week high $1,152.07$23.72$96.39 $779.14
52-week low $773.70$11.26$73.42 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGSVBNKWFC
P/E now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 12.7x 29.6xmedian 12.7x 12.0xmedian 12.7x
P/S now vs peer median 3.8xmedian 3.5x 6.8xmedian 3.5x 3.0xmedian 3.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.9xmedian 4.9x —median 4.9x 6.2xmedian 4.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median -6.7xmedian 11.0x 107.1xmedian 11.0x 9.1xmedian 11.0x
P/B now vs peer median 2.1xmedian 1.3x 1.8xmedian 1.3x 1.5xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 0.26median 1.33 —median 1.33 0.83median 1.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGSVBNKWFC
Revenue $69.70B $107.38M $87.23B
Net income $22.17B $24.43M $22.97B
Free cash flow -$39.98B $6.84M $28.91B
EPS (diluted) $70.77 – $7.20
Cash & equivalents $176.77B $349.76M –
Total debt $444.82B $74.08M $221.04B
Shares (diluted) 301.10M – 3.05B
Enterprise value -$3.48T -$913.72M $264.60B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGSVBNKWFC
P/E 12.9x 29.6x 12.0x
P/FCF -6.7x 107.1x 9.1x
P/Operating cash flow -7.1x 64.9x 9.1x
P/S 3.8x 6.8x 3.0x
P/B 2.1x 1.8x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 2.1x 1.8x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA -2.9x – 6.2x
EV/EBIT -3.0x 2.6x 6.8x
EV/Revenue -4.2x 4.3x 5.5x
EV/FCF 7.4x 66.9x 16.7x
EV/Operating cash flow 7.8x 40.5x 16.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.26 – 0.83

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGSVBNKWFC
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.7% 28.2% 5.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.3% 11.6% 2.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) 33.0% 18.8% 9.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 41.4% -3.2% 6.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 40.7% – 16.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 49.9% – 14.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -311.6% -90.0% 303.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -29.6% -58.5% -0.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -353.5% -93.9% 303.3%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -26.2% -64.9% -0.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGSVBNKWFC
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 144.7% – 89.8%
Operating margin – – –
Pretax margin 40.0% 33.2% 31.7%
Net margin 30.6% 22.8% 25.2%
FCF margin -57.4% 6.4% 33.1%
Operating cash flow margin -54.3% 10.5% 33.1%
Return on equity 17.9% 6.1% 12.9%
Return on assets 1.0% 0.5% 1.0%
Return on invested capital 13.9% 25.0% 15.1%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.0x 0.0x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -1.7x 0.5x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 5.0% 0.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGSVBNKWFC
Debt / assets 20.4% 1.5% 9.8%
Debt / equity 3.6x 0.2x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA -5.6x – 2.8x
Debt / FCF -11.1x 10.8x 7.6x
Liabilities / assets 94.3% 91.8% 92.1%
Equity / assets 5.7% 8.2% 7.9%
Interest coverage 1.4x 1.3x 1.6x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGSVBNKWFC
Dividend yield 1.9% 0.5% 2.1%
Net buyback yield 5.7% -0.8% 5.3%
Shareholder yield 7.7% -0.3% 7.5%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 9.5% 24.6%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 33.9% 19.6%
Dividend growth (1Y) – -2.9% 5.6%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -5.0% 6.7%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGSVBNKWFC
Forward P/E 12.4xFY2026 19.1xFY2026 11.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $75.07FY2026 $1.20FY2026 $7.82FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +46.3%FY2026 +44.6%FY2026 +24.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -6.8% +69.2% +7.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $68.80BFY2026 $114.67MFY2026 $94.32BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +18.1%FY2026 +29.0%FY2026 +12.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +4.5% +41.9% +4.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGSVBNKWFC
Held by institutions 72.1% 36.8% 76.8%
Institutions holding 3,153 52 2,881
Change in shares held, QoQ +1.1% +0.9% +1.1%
Institutions buying 1,555 30 1,293
Institutions selling 1,125 13 1,136
Buyers to sellers 1.38 2.31 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GSVBNKWFC
GS 1.00 0.19 0.45
VBNK 0.19 1.00 0.24
WFC 0.45 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GS, VBNK and WFC?

Goldman Sachs (GS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Goldman Sachs (GS) $267.88B, VersaBank (VBNK) $733.15M, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) $262.48B.

Which stock is cheaper, GS, VBNK and WFC?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.9x, VersaBank (VBNK) 29.6x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 12.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) is cheapest (Goldman Sachs (GS) 12.4x, VersaBank (VBNK) 19.1x, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 11.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

VersaBank (VBNK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Goldman Sachs (GS) +18.7%, VersaBank (VBNK) +28.2%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +5.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Goldman Sachs (GS) has the highest net margin (Goldman Sachs (GS) 30.6%, VersaBank (VBNK) 22.8%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.2%). On return on invested capital, VersaBank (VBNK) leads (Goldman Sachs (GS) 13.9%, VersaBank (VBNK) 25.0%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 15.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year VersaBank (VBNK) returned the most: Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.4%, VersaBank (VBNK) +97.2%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +0.4%. Over five years, Goldman Sachs (GS) compounded fastest (Goldman Sachs (GS) +17.9%/yr, VersaBank (VBNK) +13.0%/yr, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) +11.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has the highest dividend yield: Goldman Sachs (GS) 1.94%, VersaBank (VBNK) 0.47%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 2.12%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) has been the steadiest (Goldman Sachs (GS) 32.3%, VersaBank (VBNK) 39.5%, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) 25.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GS, VBNK and WFC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Wells Fargo & Company (WFC) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.