GRVY vs NTES vs WMT Stock Comparison

Gravity, NetEase and Walmart Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (GDEV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd.
$66.54 +0.0% 1M +11.8% 1Y
Market cap
$462.38M
P/E
7,810x
Revenue (TTM)
$397.44K
Div. yield
–
Video Games Technology
NTES NetEase, Inc.
$114.09 -1.1% 1M -21.9% 1Y
Market cap
$72.84B
P/E
16.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.70B
Div. yield
2.57%
Video Games Technology
8 wins
WMT Walmart Inc.
$119.32 +10.5% 1M +14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$946.65B
P/E
43.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$735.84B
Div. yield
0.83%
Discount Stores Consumer Staples
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

NetEase leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (NetEase 8, Walmart 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRVYNTESWMTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $462.38M $72.84B $946.65B WMT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7,810x 16.3x 43.0x NTES
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 11.9x 38.6x NTES
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.8% +9.8% +6.2% NTES
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.9% 26.6% 3.0% NTES
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 22.7% 16.1% NTES
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -1.4x 0.8x NTES
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 2.57% 0.83% NTES
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +11.8% -21.9% +14.2% WMT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.9%/yr +2.7%/yr +19.3%/yr WMT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.5% 33.2% 26.6% WMT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 64/100 48/100 NTES

Percentile Scorecard

GRVYNTESWMT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRVYNTESWMT
Valuation 4 #161 of 167 60 #67 of 167 10 #36 of 40
Growth 35 #100 of 153 45 #84 of 153 43 #22 of 38
Profitability 78 #35 of 153 95 #8 of 153 80 #8 of 36
Financial Health 93 #13 of 179 85 #27 of 179 64 #15 of 40
Shareholder Returns – 34 #62 of 94 44 #16 of 28
Overall 52 64 48
  • GRVY ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • NTES ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • WMT ranked among 41 companies in Staples Retail

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRVYNTESWMTSPY
1 month +0.0%-1.1%+10.5% -0.2%
3 months +7.3%-10.4%+5.5% +3.9%
6 months +8.4%+2.1%-6.5% +8.2%
Year to date +15.0%-17.1%+7.1% +12.9%
1 year +11.8%-21.9%+14.2% +12.3%
3 years +10.8%+6.8%+122.1% +87.4%
3 years, per year +3.5%+2.2%+30.5% +23.3%
5 years -37.2%+14.1%+141.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year -8.9%+2.7%+19.3% +10.9%
10 years +2,818.4%+113.6%+412.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +40.1%+7.9%+17.8% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGRVYNTESWMTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.5%33.2%26.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.0%32.8%28.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.510.49-0.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.36-0.660.53 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.0%-52.0%-26.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.5%-22.7%-11.1% -1.2%
52-week high $75.16$147.56$134.20 $779.14
52-week low $55.70$109.26$100.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRVYNTESWMT
P/E now vs peer median 7,810xmedian 17.3x 16.3xmedian 17.3x 43.0xmedian 22.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1,163xmedian 1.4x 4.4xmedian 1.4x 1.3xmedian 0.5x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 14.2x 10.3xmedian 14.2x 20.8xmedian 9.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.5x 9.8xmedian 11.5x 70.1xmedian 17.5x
P/B now vs peer median 1,018xmedian 1.8x 3.0xmedian 1.8x 9.1xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.40 2.27median 0.40 2.54median 1.19

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRVYNTESWMT
Revenue $397.44K $16.70B $735.84B
Gross profit $133.70K $11.22B $185.66B
Operating income $62.95K $5.90B $32.28B
Net income $46.60M $4.75B $22.55B
Free cash flow – $7.46B $13.51B
R&D $5.30K $2.59B –
EPS (diluted) – $6.91 $2.77
Cash & equivalents $136.25K $3.36B $11.53B
Total debt – $5.39B $50.41B
Shares (diluted) – 643.63M 7.98B
Enterprise value $316.51M $31.72B $909.36B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRVYNTESWMT
P/E 7,810x 16.3x 43.0x
P/FCF – 9.8x 70.1x
P/Operating cash flow – 9.9x 22.1x
P/S 1,163x 4.4x 1.3x
P/B 1,018x 3.0x 9.1x
P/Tangible book 1,018x 3.0x 9.1x
EV/EBITDA – 10.3x 20.8x
EV/EBIT 7,338x 10.8x 30.5x
EV/Revenue 1,162x 3.8x 1.3x
EV/FCF – 8.6x 73.0x
EV/Operating cash flow – 8.7x 23.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.27 2.54

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRVYNTESWMT
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.8% 9.8% 6.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.4% 5.5% 5.3%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -10.0% 16.9% 7.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -9.4% 11.5% 6.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 0.0% 23.6% 11.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -19.1% 22.2% 14.0%
Net income growth (1Y) 80,576% -2.8% 2.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 677.0% 9.2% 16.3%
EPS growth (1Y) – -4.7% 3.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 7.2% 16.9%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 13.9% 11.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 19.3% 4.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 12.3% -1.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 17.2% -11.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRVYNTESWMT
Gross margin 33.6% 67.2% 25.2%
EBITDA margin – 37.2% 6.4%
Operating margin 15.8% 35.3% 4.4%
Pretax margin 19.9% 34.9% 4.0%
Net margin 14.9% 26.6% 3.0%
FCF margin – 44.7% 1.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 44.0% 5.8%
Return on equity 13.2% 19.6% 21.9%
Return on assets 11.2% 14.0% 7.7%
Return on invested capital – 22.7% 16.1%
Return on capital employed 13.8% 23.0% 18.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.5x 2.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – 1.5x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.7% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRVYNTESWMT
Debt / assets – 5.4% 17.2%
Debt / equity – 0.1x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – -1.4x 0.8x
Debt / FCF – 0.2x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 14.1% 28.0% 64.4%
Equity / assets 85.9% 72.0% 35.6%
Interest coverage 25.1x – 17.4x
Current ratio 7.2x 3.5x 0.8x
Quick ratio 6.9x 1.4x 0.2x
Cash ratio 6.2x 1.3x 0.1x
Altman Z-score 3,729 7.28 6.25

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRVYNTESWMT
Dividend yield – 2.6% 0.8%
Net buyback yield – 0.0% 0.7%
Shareholder yield – 2.6% 1.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 34.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 57.0%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 8.3%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 8.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRVYNTESWMT
Forward P/E – 11.9xFY2026 38.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $9.56FY2026 $3.09FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +15.3%FY2026 +17.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +7.2% +1.6%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $17.11BFY2026 $719.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +6.3%FY2026 +0.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +7.4% +6.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRVYNTESWMT
Held by institutions 16.6% 9.2% 37.2%
Institutions holding 57 458 4,410
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.9% +1.9% +6.2%
Institutions buying 36 261 2,093
Institutions selling 11 121 1,839
Buyers to sellers 3.27 2.16 1.14

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRVYNTESWMT
GRVY 1.00 0.14 0.04
NTES 0.14 1.00 0.10
WMT 0.04 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRVY, NTES and WMT?

Walmart (WMT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gravity (GRVY) $462.38M, NetEase (NTES) $72.84B, Walmart (WMT) $946.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, GRVY, NTES and WMT?

NetEase (NTES) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Gravity (GRVY) 7,810x, NetEase (NTES) 16.3x, Walmart (WMT) 43.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, NetEase (NTES) is cheapest (NetEase (NTES) 11.9x, Walmart (WMT) 38.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

NetEase (NTES) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gravity (GRVY) -1.8%, NetEase (NTES) +9.8%, Walmart (WMT) +6.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

NetEase (NTES) has the highest net margin (Gravity (GRVY) 14.9%, NetEase (NTES) 26.6%, Walmart (WMT) 3.0%). On return on invested capital, NetEase (NTES) leads (NetEase (NTES) 22.7%, Walmart (WMT) 16.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Walmart (WMT) returned the most: Gravity (GRVY) +11.8%, NetEase (NTES) -21.9%, Walmart (WMT) +14.2%. Over five years, Walmart (WMT) compounded fastest (Gravity (GRVY) -8.9%/yr, NetEase (NTES) +2.7%/yr, Walmart (WMT) +19.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

NetEase (NTES) has the highest dividend yield: NetEase (NTES) 2.57%, Walmart (WMT) 0.83%. Gravity (GRVY) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Walmart (WMT) has been the steadiest (Gravity (GRVY) 32.5%, NetEase (NTES) 33.2%, Walmart (WMT) 26.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRVY, NTES and WMT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, NetEase (NTES) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.