GRVY vs GCL vs GLXZ Stock Comparison

Gravity, GCL Global Holdings and Galaxy Gaming Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GRVY GRAVITY Co., Ltd.
$66.79 0.0% 1M +12.9% 1Y
Market cap
$469.05M
P/E
7,923x
Revenue (TTM)
$397.44K
Div. yield
–
Video Games Technology
4 wins
GLXZ Galaxy Gaming, Inc.
$1.64 +1.9% 1M -41.6% 1Y
Market cap
$42.34M
P/E
8.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.16M
Div. yield
–
Video Games Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Gravity leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Gravity 4, Galaxy Gaming 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRVYGCLGLXZLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $469.05M $110.91M $42.34M GRVY
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 7,923x -4.3x 8.6x GLXZ
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — — — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -1.8% — +2.1% GLXZ
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.9% — 15.8% GLXZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 36.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 2.8x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +12.9% -53.0% -41.6% GRVY
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -9.4%/yr — -17.7%/yr GRVY
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 32.5% 121.0% 48.8% GRVY
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 53/100 — 62/100 GLXZ

Percentile Scorecard

GRVYGCLGLXZ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRVYGCLGLXZ
Valuation 4 #159 of 166 36 #106 of 166 87 #23 of 166
Growth 35 #99 of 152 – 70 #46 of 152
Profitability 80 #32 of 152 – 97 #5 of 152
Financial Health 93 #13 of 179 27 #131 of 179 28 #129 of 179
Shareholder Returns – – 28 #68 of 94
Overall 53 – 62
  • GRVY ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GCL ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • GLXZ ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRVYGCLGLXZSPY
1 month 0.0%+14.5%+1.9% +0.9%
3 months +8.5%+85.1%+1.9% +5.9%
6 months +10.1%+85.1%-10.9% +8.5%
Year to date +15.4%-18.7%-42.7% +13.3%
1 year +12.9%-53.0%-41.6% +12.4%
3 years +11.2%-91.9%-37.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year +3.6%-56.7%-14.7% +23.5%
5 years -38.9%—-62.1% +68.2%
5 years, per year -9.4%—-17.7% +11.0%
10 years +1,263.1%—+215.4% +263.4%
10 years, per year +29.9%—+12.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGRVYGCLGLXZSPY
Volatility, 1Y 32.5%121.0%48.8% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.1%118.7%54.2% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.512.000.26 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.40-0.44-0.85 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -67.0%-96.7%-76.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -11.1%-53.0%-44.4% -0.9%
52-week high $75.16$1.85$2.95 $779.14
52-week low $55.70$0.38$1.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRVYGCLGLXZ
P/E now vs peer median 7,840xmedian 16.8x -4.3xmedian 16.8x 8.7xmedian 16.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1,168xmedian 1.4x 0.5xmedian 1.4x 1.3xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 13.9x —median 13.9x 6.2xmedian 13.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median —median 11.4x -9.6xmedian 11.4x 5.6xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1,022xmedian 1.8x 2.7xmedian 1.8x -2.7xmedian 1.8x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.36 —median 0.36 0.04median 0.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRVYGCLGLXZ
Revenue $397.44K – $31.16M
Gross profit $133.70K – $30.61M
Operating income $62.95K – $8.33M
Net income $46.60M – $4.92M
Free cash flow – – $7.41M
R&D $5.30K – $605.98K
EPS (diluted) – – $0.19
Cash & equivalents $136.25K $36.58M $4.76M
Total debt – – $155.53M
Shares (diluted) – 123.23M 26.13M
Enterprise value $323.18M $29.11M $25.08M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRVYGCLGLXZ
P/E 7,840x -4.3x 8.7x
P/FCF – -9.6x 5.6x
P/Operating cash flow – – 5.5x
P/S 1,168x 0.5x 1.3x
P/B 1,022x 2.7x -2.7x
P/Tangible book 1,022x 3.6x -1.7x
EV/EBITDA – – 6.2x
EV/EBIT 7,366x – 9.0x
EV/Revenue 1,167x – 2.4x
EV/FCF – – 10.1x
EV/Operating cash flow – – 9.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – 0.04

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRVYGCLGLXZ
Revenue growth (1Y) -1.8% – 2.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -8.4% – 5.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -10.0% – 3.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -9.4% – 5.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 0.0% – 67.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -19.1% – 0.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 80,576% – 218.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 677.0% – 210.5%
EPS growth (1Y) – – 218.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – 208.1%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – 64.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 3.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – 65.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – 3.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRVYGCLGLXZ
Gross margin 33.6% – 98.2%
EBITDA margin – – 38.6%
Operating margin 15.8% – 26.7%
Pretax margin 19.9% – 16.1%
Net margin 14.9% – 15.8%
FCF margin – – 23.8%
Operating cash flow margin – – 24.1%
Return on equity 13.2% – –
Return on assets 11.2% – 18.2%
Return on invested capital – – 36.2%
Return on capital employed 13.8% – 41.7%
Asset turnover 0.8x – 1.2x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 1.5x
Stock comp / revenue – – 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRVYGCLGLXZ
Debt / assets – 30.1% 140.6%
Debt / equity – 1.3x -2.5x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 2.8x
Debt / FCF – – 5.1x
Liabilities / assets 14.1% 77.7% 156.2%
Equity / assets 85.9% 22.3% -56.2%
Interest coverage 25.1x – 2.6x
Current ratio 7.2x 1.5x 1.5x
Quick ratio 6.9x 0.9x 1.7x
Cash ratio 6.2x 0.4x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 3,743 – 1.07

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRVYGCLGLXZ
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – – -0.1%
Shareholder yield – – -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRVYGCLGLXZ

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRVYGCLGLXZ
Held by institutions 16.6% – 0.9%
Institutions holding 57 – 2
Change in shares held, QoQ +17.9% – –
Institutions buying 36 – 0
Institutions selling 11 – 0
Buyers to sellers 3.27 – –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRVYGCLGLXZ
GRVY 1.00 -0.02 0.02
GCL -0.02 1.00 0.12
GLXZ 0.02 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRVY, GCL and GLXZ?

Gravity (GRVY) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gravity (GRVY) $469.05M, GCL Global Holdings (GCL) $110.91M, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) $42.34M.

Which stock is cheaper, GRVY, GCL and GLXZ?

Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Gravity (GRVY) 7,923x, GCL Global Holdings (GCL) -4.3x, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 8.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gravity (GRVY) -1.8%, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) +2.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) has the highest net margin (Gravity (GRVY) 14.9%, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 15.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Gravity (GRVY) returned the most: Gravity (GRVY) +12.9%, GCL Global Holdings (GCL) -53.0%, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) -41.6%. Over five years, Gravity (GRVY) compounded fastest (Gravity (GRVY) -9.4%/yr, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) -17.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gravity (GRVY) has been the steadiest (Gravity (GRVY) 32.5%, GCL Global Holdings (GCL) 121.0%, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 48.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRVY, GCL and GLXZ?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gravity (GRVY) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.