GRRR vs CXT vs HOLO Stock Comparison

Gorilla Technology, Crane NXT and MicroCloud Hologram Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EVLV) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
CXT Crane NXT, Co.
$60.21 +28.1% 1M -7.3% 1Y
Market cap
$3.47B
P/E
24.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.80B
Div. yield
1.18%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
7 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Crane NXT leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Crane NXT 7, Gorilla Technology 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRRRCXTHOLOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $239.37M $3.47B $15.55M CXT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -4.1x 24.7x — –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 13.1x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +50.4% +17.3% — GRRR
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -35.4% 7.8% — CXT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -2.9% 7.4% — CXT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 3.2x — GRRR
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 1.18% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -42.2% -7.3% -71.9% CXT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -38.0%/yr +10.9%/yr -89.2%/yr CXT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 88.3% 39.0% 67.0% CXT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 40/100 45/100 — CXT

Percentile Scorecard

GRRRCXTHOLO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRRRCXTHOLO
Valuation 46 #67 of 124 68 #65 of 203 –
Growth 72 #32 of 113 50 #95 of 188 –
Profitability 32 #74 of 109 62 #71 of 183 –
Financial Health 41 #75 of 127 18 #177 of 216 99 #2 of 127
Shareholder Returns 7 #59 of 63 27 #112 of 152 –
Overall 40 45 –
  • GRRR ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • CXT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • HOLO ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRRRCXTHOLOSPY
1 month -34.0%+28.1%-27.2% +0.7%
3 months -20.3%+16.7%-26.3% +3.7%
6 months -37.2%+34.8%-27.6% +7.1%
Year to date -16.3%+27.9%-55.3% +12.8%
1 year -42.2%-7.3%-71.9% +11.9%
3 years +11.5%+18.3%-100.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +3.7%+5.8%-94.3% +22.8%
5 years -90.8%+67.9%-100.0% +67.6%
5 years, per year -38.0%+10.9%-89.2% +10.9%
10 years —+154.2%— +262.0%
10 years, per year —+9.8%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGRRRCXTHOLOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 88.3%39.0%67.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 93.7%41.2%74.2% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.711.212.46 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.48-0.19-1.07 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.4%-47.6%-100.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -58.0%-7.3%-73.9% -1.2%
52-week high $21.78$64.98$4.52 $779.14
52-week low $7.44$36.13$1.16 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRRRCXTHOLO
P/E now vs peer median -4.1xmedian 39.0x 24.7xmedian 25.8x —median 39.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.7xmedian 4.6x 1.9xmedian 1.9x —median 4.6x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.6xmedian 32.7x 12.4xmedian 14.6x —median 32.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -36.1xmedian 27.4x 15.5xmedian 22.2x —median 27.4x
P/B now vs peer median 1.4xmedian 3.2x 2.7xmedian 2.2x 0.0xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.23 -2.36median 1.45 —median 1.23

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRRRCXTHOLO
Revenue $140.40M $1.80B –
Gross profit $24.27M $759.30M –
Operating income -$51.78M $252.60M –
Net income -$51.45M $141.40M –
Free cash flow -$6.62M $224.00M –
R&D $4.02M – –
EPS (diluted) $-2.23 $2.42 –
Cash & equivalents $179.36M $231.40M $110.42M
Total debt $6.95B $1.45B $1.87M
Shares (diluted) 22.25M 58.00M 13.18M
Enterprise value -$252.08M $2.61B -$2.17B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRRRCXTHOLO
P/E -4.1x 24.7x –
P/FCF -36.1x 15.5x –
P/Operating cash flow -11.7x 12.8x –
P/S 1.7x 1.9x –
P/B 1.4x 2.7x 0.0x
P/Tangible book 1.4x 6.7x 0.0x
EV/EBITDA -2.6x 12.4x –
EV/EBIT -2.6x 18.6x –
EV/Revenue 0.9x 2.6x –
EV/FCF -20.1x 20.9x –
EV/Operating cash flow -6.5x 17.3x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -2.36 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRRRCXTHOLO
Revenue growth (1Y) 50.4% 17.3% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 10.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) -26.6% 14.9% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 5.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.4% 9.4% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -4.0% –
Net income growth (1Y) 34.1% -6.6% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -9.9% –
EPS growth (1Y) 68.5% -7.4% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -10.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 33.7% 41.3% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -1.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 78.9% 52.0% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -4.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRRRCXTHOLO
Gross margin 17.3% 42.1% –
EBITDA margin -36.2% 21.0% –
Operating margin -36.9% 14.0% –
Pretax margin -32.9% 9.8% –
Net margin -35.4% 7.8% –
FCF margin -4.7% 12.4% –
Operating cash flow margin -14.6% 15.0% –
Return on equity -29.1% 11.3% –
Return on assets -15.7% 3.9% –
Return on invested capital -2.9% 7.4% –
Return on capital employed -30.8% 8.6% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.9x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.4% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRRRCXTHOLO
Debt / assets 18.8% 40.4% 0.0%
Debt / equity 0.4x 1.1x 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.1x 3.2x –
Debt / FCF -11.1x 6.5x –
Liabilities / assets 56.2% 64.8% 2.9%
Equity / assets 43.8% 35.2% 97.1%
Interest coverage -21.8x 3.5x –
Current ratio 2.2x 1.4x 34.6x
Quick ratio 2.1x 0.9x 107.3x
Cash ratio 1.2x 0.3x 107.0x
Altman Z-score 0.42 1.88 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRRRCXTHOLO
Dividend yield – 1.2% –
Net buyback yield -12.4% -0.7% –
Shareholder yield -12.4% 0.5% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRRRCXTHOLO
Forward P/E – 13.1xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-2.61FY2026 $4.59FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY -396.6%FY2026 +13.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – 0.0% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $201.05MFY2026 $1.85BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +98.4%FY2026 +11.4%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +217.5% +17.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRRRCXTHOLO
Held by institutions 26.6% 100.0% 3.0%
Institutions holding 72 360 16
Change in shares held, QoQ +79.2% +12.7% +135.7%
Institutions buying 51 183 11
Institutions selling 13 111 0
Buyers to sellers 3.92 1.65 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRRRCXTHOLO
GRRR 1.00 0.13 0.41
CXT 0.13 1.00 0.24
HOLO 0.41 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRRR, CXT and HOLO?

Crane NXT (CXT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gorilla Technology (GRRR) $239.37M, Crane NXT (CXT) $3.47B, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) $15.55M.

Which company is growing faster?

Gorilla Technology (GRRR) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gorilla Technology (GRRR) +50.4%, Crane NXT (CXT) +17.3%.

Which company is more profitable?

Crane NXT (CXT) has the highest net margin (Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -35.4%, Crane NXT (CXT) 7.8%). On return on invested capital, Crane NXT (CXT) leads (Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -2.9%, Crane NXT (CXT) 7.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Crane NXT (CXT) returned the most: Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -42.2%, Crane NXT (CXT) -7.3%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -71.9%. Over five years, Crane NXT (CXT) compounded fastest (Gorilla Technology (GRRR) -38.0%/yr, Crane NXT (CXT) +10.9%/yr, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) -89.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Crane NXT (CXT) 1.18%. Gorilla Technology (GRRR) and MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Crane NXT (CXT) has been the steadiest (Gorilla Technology (GRRR) 88.3%, Crane NXT (CXT) 39.0%, MicroCloud Hologram (HOLO) 67.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRRR, CXT and HOLO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Crane NXT (CXT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.