GRO vs MOS vs CVI Stock Comparison

Brazil Potash, Mosaic and Cvr Energy Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SSL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRO Brazil Potash Corp.
$1.80 -19.3% 1M -34.5% 1Y
Market cap
$76.27M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
MOS Mosaic Co
$18.31 -17.7% 1M -37.7% 1Y
Market cap
$5.78B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$12.25B
Div. yield
0.05%
Fertilizers Basic Materials
3 wins
CVI Cvr Energy Inc
$57.02 +12.3% 1M +48.5% 1Y
Market cap
$5.65B
P/E
81.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$8.47B
Div. yield
–
Oil Refining Energy
7 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Cvr Energy leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Cvr Energy 7, Mosaic 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGROMOSCVILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $76.27M $5.78B $5.65B MOS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.9x -9.0x 81.9x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 53.9x 17.0x CVI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +8.8% +17.9% CVI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -5.2% 0.8% CVI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -1.0% 10.2% CVI
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 5.6x 1.4x CVI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.05% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -34.5% -37.7% +48.5% CVI
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -15.1%/yr +24.4%/yr CVI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 78.8% 45.1% 54.7% MOS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 42/100 24/100 MOS

Percentile Scorecard

GROMOSCVI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGROMOSCVI
Valuation 13 #82 of 94 54 #44 of 94 5 #22 of 23
Growth 52 #44 of 91 7 #85 of 91 44 #11 of 19
Profitability 7 #78 of 84 36 #54 of 84 29 #13 of 18
Financial Health 94 #7 of 94 31 #65 of 94 44 #14 of 24
Shareholder Returns 0 #69 of 69 82 #13 of 69 0 #18 of 18
Overall 33 42 24
  • GRO ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • MOS ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • CVI ranked among 25 companies in Refining and Marketing

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGROMOSCVISPY
1 month -19.3%-17.7%+12.3% +0.9%
3 months -11.8%-19.1%+64.5% +5.9%
6 months -41.7%-20.5%+67.1% +8.5%
Year to date -4.8%-24.0%+124.1% +13.3%
1 year -34.5%-37.7%+48.5% +12.4%
3 years —-44.7%+83.9% +88.1%
3 years, per year —-17.9%+22.5% +23.5%
5 years —-56.0%+197.4% +68.2%
5 years, per year —-15.1%+24.4% +11.0%
10 years —-23.0%+331.0% +263.4%
10 years, per year —-2.6%+15.7% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGROMOSCVISPY
Volatility, 1Y 78.8%45.1%54.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 79.0%44.2%51.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.560.62-0.38 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.44-0.840.89 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.5%-77.9%-63.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -53.7%-41.6%-9.7% -0.9%
52-week high $3.89$31.36$63.12 $779.14
52-week low $1.69$17.26$20.72 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGROMOSCVI
P/E now vs peer median -0.9xmedian 22.0x -9.1xmedian 22.0x 83.1xmedian 8.9x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.4x 0.5xmedian 1.4x 0.7xmedian 0.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.4x 11.4xmedian 12.4x 8.8xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.9xmedian 15.5x -6.1xmedian 15.5x 16.3xmedian 8.5x
P/B now vs peer median 0.4xmedian 1.7x 0.5xmedian 1.7x 7.7xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.84 0.28median 1.84 -1.68median 0.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGROMOSCVI
Revenue – $12.25B $8.47B
Gross profit – $1.35B $517.00M
Operating income -$95.57M -$169.80M $350.00M
Net income -$28.15M -$624.70M $171.00M
Free cash flow -$24.85M -$947.10M $351.00M
EPS (diluted) $-2.04 $-2.01 $0.69
Cash & equivalents $75.71M $294.00M $737.00M
Total debt – $21.00B $1.77B
Shares (diluted) 42.49M 317.90M 100.50M
Enterprise value -$59.04M $4.77B $3.22B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGROMOSCVI
P/E -0.9x -9.1x 83.1x
P/FCF -3.9x -6.1x 16.3x
P/Operating cash flow -7.7x 13.1x 10.7x
P/S – 0.5x 0.7x
P/B 0.4x 0.5x 7.7x
P/Tangible book 0.4x 0.5x 7.7x
EV/EBITDA – 11.4x 8.8x
EV/EBIT -0.2x -67.0x 19.3x
EV/Revenue – 0.9x 0.8x
EV/FCF -0.8x -12.0x 19.3x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.7x 25.6x 12.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.28 -1.68

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGROMOSCVI
Revenue growth (1Y) – 8.8% 17.9%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -10.0% -5.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -22.0% 404.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -28.7% -21.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.3% -121.3% 207.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -27.3% -26.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 57.9% -164.7% 162.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -31.6% -37.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.7% -168.2% 120.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – -32.2% -49.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.5% -62.5% 320.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -47.5% -15.0%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1.1% -22,126% 750.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -36.5% -19.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGROMOSCVI
Gross margin – 11.0% 6.1%
EBITDA margin – 8.1% 9.0%
Operating margin – -1.4% 4.1%
Pretax margin – -2.0% 2.8%
Net margin – -5.2% 0.8%
FCF margin – -7.7% 4.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 3.6% 6.3%
Return on equity -47.7% -5.2% 23.1%
Return on assets -43.5% -2.5% 4.3%
Return on invested capital – -1.0% 10.2%
Return on capital employed -48.5% -0.8% 12.7%
Asset turnover – 0.5x 2.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x -0.7x 3.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.3% 0.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGROMOSCVI
Debt / assets – 23.8% 43.4%
Debt / equity – 0.5x 2.4x
Net debt / EBITDA – 5.6x 1.4x
Debt / FCF – -6.2x 5.0x
Liabilities / assets 5.4% 52.8% 81.8%
Equity / assets 94.6% 47.2% 18.2%
Interest coverage -94.7x – –
Current ratio 42.2x 1.3x 1.4x
Quick ratio 41.9x 0.3x 0.9x
Cash ratio 41.8x 0.1x 0.6x
Altman Z-score – 1.58 3.20

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGROMOSCVI
Dividend yield – 4.8% 0.4%
Net buyback yield -65.4% – –
Shareholder yield -65.4% 4.8% 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – -44.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – -29.6% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 2.1% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -4.7% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGROMOSCVI
Forward P/E – 53.9xFY2026 17.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.49FY2026 $0.34FY2026 $3.36FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – -85.0%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +297.1% +43.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2026 $11.74BFY2026 $9.70BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -2.6%FY2026 +35.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +15.0% -23.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGROMOSCVI
Held by institutions – 95.2% 100.0%
Institutions holding – 662 223
Change in shares held, QoQ – +7.4% +2.0%
Institutions buying – 374 105
Institutions selling – 212 75
Buyers to sellers – 1.76 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GROMOSCVI
GRO 1.00 0.38 0.12
MOS 0.38 1.00 0.09
CVI 0.12 0.09 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRO, MOS and CVI?

Mosaic (MOS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brazil Potash (GRO) $76.27M, Mosaic (MOS) $5.78B, Cvr Energy (CVI) $5.65B.

Which company is growing faster?

Cvr Energy (CVI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Mosaic (MOS) +8.8%, Cvr Energy (CVI) +17.9%.

Which company is more profitable?

Cvr Energy (CVI) has the highest net margin (Mosaic (MOS) -5.2%, Cvr Energy (CVI) 0.8%). On return on invested capital, Cvr Energy (CVI) leads (Mosaic (MOS) -1.0%, Cvr Energy (CVI) 10.2%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Cvr Energy (CVI) returned the most: Brazil Potash (GRO) -34.5%, Mosaic (MOS) -37.7%, Cvr Energy (CVI) +48.5%. Over five years, Cvr Energy (CVI) compounded fastest (Mosaic (MOS) -15.1%/yr, Cvr Energy (CVI) +24.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brazil Potash (GRO) 0.00%, Mosaic (MOS) 0.05%, Cvr Energy (CVI) 0.00%. Brazil Potash (GRO) and Cvr Energy (CVI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mosaic (MOS) has been the steadiest (Brazil Potash (GRO) 78.8%, Mosaic (MOS) 45.1%, Cvr Energy (CVI) 54.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRO, MOS and CVI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cvr Energy (CVI) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.