GRO vs CF vs BCPC Stock Comparison

Brazil Potash, CF Industries Holdings and Balchem Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (SSL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRO Brazil Potash Corp.
$1.86 -21.2% 1M -27.3% 1Y
Market cap
$76.48M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Fertilizers Basic Materials
BCPC Balchem Corp
$168.70 +0.5% 1M +9.2% 1Y
Market cap
$5.27B
P/E
30.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.11B
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

CF Industries Holdings leads on 10 of the 12 questions below (CF Industries Holdings 10, Balchem 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGROCFBCPCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $76.48M $18.44B $5.27B CF
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.9x 8.8x 30.9x CF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 8.5x 32.8x CF
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +20.0% +9.4% CF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — 27.1% 15.4% CF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 21.7% 12.1% CF
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 0.2x 0.3x CF
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -27.3% +39.5% +9.2% CF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +15.9%/yr +1.9%/yr CF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 79.1% 42.6% 20.7% BCPC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 84/100 68/100 CF

Percentile Scorecard

GROCFBCPC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGROCFBCPC
Valuation 13 #82 of 94 83 #17 of 94 34 #62 of 94
Growth 53 #43 of 91 71 #27 of 91 87 #13 of 91
Profitability 6 #81 of 86 99 #2 of 86 85 #14 of 86
Financial Health 94 #7 of 95 92 #9 of 95 89 #11 of 95
Shareholder Returns 0 #70 of 70 77 #17 of 70 44 #40 of 70
Overall 33 84 68
  • GRO ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • CF ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • BCPC ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGROCFBCPCSPY
1 month -21.2%+5.1%+0.5% -0.2%
3 months -9.3%-2.0%+1.8% +3.9%
6 months -41.0%-1.5%-4.8% +8.2%
Year to date -1.6%+55.8%+10.0% +12.9%
1 year -27.3%+39.5%+9.2% +12.3%
3 years —+50.9%+46.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+14.7%+13.6% +23.3%
5 years —+109.4%+10.1% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+15.9%+1.9% +10.9%
10 years —+391.4%+125.9% +261.1%
10 years, per year —+17.3%+8.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGROCFBCPCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 79.1%42.6%20.7% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 79.2%43.0%19.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.58-1.070.15 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.350.930.44 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.5%-49.1%-34.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -52.2%-13.5%-7.9% -1.2%
52-week high $3.89$139.27$183.26 $779.14
52-week low $1.69$76.09$147.36 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGROCFBCPC
P/E now vs peer median -0.9xmedian 22.0x 8.8xmedian 22.0x 31.3xmedian 22.0x
P/S now vs peer median —median 1.4x 2.4xmedian 1.4x 4.8xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 12.4x 4.7xmedian 12.4x 19.6xmedian 12.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median -4.0xmedian 15.1x 9.6xmedian 15.1x 30.2xmedian 15.1x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 1.6x 2.0xmedian 1.6x 4.0xmedian 1.6x
PEG now vs peer median —median 1.66 2.38median 1.66 1.66median 1.66

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGROCFBCPC
Revenue – $7.74B $1.11B
Gross profit – $3.29B $404.38M
Operating income -$95.57M $3.18B $229.57M
Net income -$28.15M $2.50B $170.85M
Free cash flow -$24.85M $1.91B $178.00M
R&D – – $20.81M
EPS (diluted) $-2.04 $13.64 $5.33
Cash & equivalents $75.71M $2.48B $66.26M
Total debt – $3.22B $145.94M
Shares (diluted) 42.49M 153.90M 32.03M
Enterprise value -$58.82M $10.10B $5.00B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGROCFBCPC
P/E -0.9x 8.8x 31.3x
P/FCF -4.0x 9.6x 30.2x
P/Operating cash flow -7.9x 6.1x 24.0x
P/S – 2.4x 4.8x
P/B 0.5x 2.0x 4.0x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 2.2x 4.4x
EV/EBITDA – 4.7x 19.6x
EV/EBIT -0.3x 6.0x 23.7x
EV/Revenue – 2.5x 4.9x
EV/FCF -1.0x 9.9x 30.6x
EV/Operating cash flow -1.9x 6.4x 24.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 2.38 1.66

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGROCFBCPC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 20.0% 9.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -3.9% 6.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 43.3% 11.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -5.0% 11.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -3.3% 66.7% 12.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – -3.3% 14.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 57.9% 58.6% 14.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – -3.7% 18.3%
EPS growth (1Y) 27.7% 70.9% 16.5%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 3.7% 18.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 20.5% 19.1% 11.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -2.7% 12.3%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1.1% 6.9% 10.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – -11.4% 14.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGROCFBCPC
Gross margin – 42.5% 36.5%
EBITDA margin – 52.6% 25.1%
Operating margin – 41.1% 20.7%
Pretax margin – 40.1% 19.9%
Net margin – 27.1% 15.4%
FCF margin – 24.7% 16.1%
Operating cash flow margin – 38.5% 20.2%
Return on equity -47.7% 29.1% 13.0%
Return on assets -43.5% 16.8% 10.1%
Return on invested capital – 21.7% 12.1%
Return on capital employed -48.5% 22.6% 15.0%
Asset turnover – 0.5x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.4x 1.2x 1.3x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.6% 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGROCFBCPC
Debt / assets – 21.3% 8.6%
Debt / equity – 0.4x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 0.2x 0.3x
Debt / FCF – 1.7x 0.8x
Liabilities / assets 5.4% 40.9% 22.1%
Equity / assets 94.6% 59.1% 77.9%
Interest coverage -94.7x 18.6x –
Current ratio 42.2x 4.9x 2.5x
Quick ratio 41.9x 4.1x 1.3x
Cash ratio 41.8x 3.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score – 3.66 10.84

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGROCFBCPC
Dividend yield – 1.7% 0.6%
Net buyback yield -63.3% 5.2% 2.1%
Shareholder yield -63.3% 7.0% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 12.6% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 16.4% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – -8.5% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -0.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGROCFBCPC
Forward P/E – 8.5xFY2026 32.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.49FY2026 $14.21FY2026 $5.15FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +48.5%FY2026 +8.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -22.6% +6.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2026 $8.52BFY2026 $1.07BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +20.3%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -10.2% +9.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGROCFBCPC
Held by institutions – 100.0% 90.5%
Institutions holding – 968 417
Change in shares held, QoQ – +5.8% +1.5%
Institutions buying – 547 193
Institutions selling – 309 162
Buyers to sellers – 1.77 1.19

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GROCFBCPC
GRO 1.00 0.20 0.02
CF 0.20 1.00 -0.04
BCPC 0.02 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRO, CF and BCPC?

CF Industries Holdings (CF) is the largest by market capitalisation: Brazil Potash (GRO) $76.48M, CF Industries Holdings (CF) $18.44B, Balchem (BCPC) $5.27B.

Which stock is cheaper, GRO, CF and BCPC?

CF Industries Holdings (CF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Brazil Potash (GRO) -0.9x, CF Industries Holdings (CF) 8.8x, Balchem (BCPC) 30.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, CF Industries Holdings (CF) is cheapest (CF Industries Holdings (CF) 8.5x, Balchem (BCPC) 32.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

CF Industries Holdings (CF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: CF Industries Holdings (CF) +20.0%, Balchem (BCPC) +9.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

CF Industries Holdings (CF) has the highest net margin (CF Industries Holdings (CF) 27.1%, Balchem (BCPC) 15.4%). On return on invested capital, CF Industries Holdings (CF) leads (CF Industries Holdings (CF) 21.7%, Balchem (BCPC) 12.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year CF Industries Holdings (CF) returned the most: Brazil Potash (GRO) -27.3%, CF Industries Holdings (CF) +39.5%, Balchem (BCPC) +9.2%. Over five years, CF Industries Holdings (CF) compounded fastest (CF Industries Holdings (CF) +15.9%/yr, Balchem (BCPC) +1.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Brazil Potash (GRO) 0.00%, CF Industries Holdings (CF) 0.02%, Balchem (BCPC) 0.00%. Brazil Potash (GRO) and Balchem (BCPC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Balchem (BCPC) has been the steadiest (Brazil Potash (GRO) 79.1%, CF Industries Holdings (CF) 42.6%, Balchem (BCPC) 20.7%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRO, CF and BCPC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, CF Industries Holdings (CF) leads on 10. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.