GRML vs VTRS vs BHC Stock Comparison

Greenland Mines, Viatris and Bausch Health Companies Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AMPH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.45 -54.0% 1M +938.9% 1Y
Market cap
$13.03M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win
VTRS Viatris Inc
$18.77 +2.7% 1M +82.4% 1Y
Market cap
$22.31B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$14.74B
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
4 wins

Head to Head

6 decided of 12

Viatris leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Viatris 4, Bausch Health Companies 1, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRMLVTRSBHCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $13.03M $22.31B $3.33B VTRS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.6x -54.3x -4.0x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 7.2x 1.4x BHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +4.4% — –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -2.8% — –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — -0.2% — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 4.6x — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +938.9% +82.4% +12.3% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +7.1%/yr -24.4%/yr VTRS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 444.8% 32.3% 55.5% VTRS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 33/100 66/100 — VTRS

Percentile Scorecard

GRMLVTRSBHC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRMLVTRSBHC
Valuation 13 #546 of 625 93 #43 of 625 96 #26 of 625
Growth 2 #588 of 602 48 #312 of 602 34 #400 of 602
Profitability 68 #176 of 549 81 #103 of 549 –
Financial Health 78 #146 of 654 22 #508 of 654 –
Shareholder Returns 6 #345 of 367 86 #54 of 367 –
Overall 33 66 –
  • GRML ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • VTRS ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BHC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRMLVTRSBHCSPY
1 month -54.0%+2.7%+20.2% +0.9%
3 months +2,768.4%+5.3%+48.5% +5.9%
6 months +1,173.1%+25.4%+24.3% +8.5%
Year to date +1,785.8%+50.8%0.0% +13.3%
1 year +938.9%+82.4%+12.3% +12.4%
3 years -49.0%+114.0%+5.8% +88.1%
3 years, per year -20.1%+28.9%+1.9% +23.5%
5 years —+40.6%-75.2% +68.2%
5 years, per year —+7.1%-24.4% +11.0%
10 years —-49.5%-65.8% +263.4%
10 years, per year —-6.6%-10.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGRMLVTRSBHCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 444.8%32.3%55.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 158.4%29.7%48.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.760.700.90 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.112.550.22 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.0%-52.9%-84.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -63.4%0.0%-12.0% -0.9%
52-week high $14.89$18.77$7.90 $779.14
52-week low $0.17$10.11$4.43 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRMLVTRSBHC
P/E now vs peer median -0.6xmedian 17.4x -53.2xmedian 17.4x -3.1xmedian 17.4x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.1x 1.5xmedian 9.1x 0.2xmedian 9.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 17.1x 12.5xmedian 17.1x —median 17.1x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.0xmedian 19.0x 11.0xmedian 19.0x 1.5xmedian 19.0x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.2x 1.5xmedian 2.2x —median 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.34 1.74median 0.34 -0.56median 0.34

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRMLVTRSBHC
Revenue – $14.74B –
Gross profit – $5.13B –
Operating income -$18.67M -$87.30M $1.25B
Net income -$21.77M -$410.70M –
Free cash flow -$14.22M $1.95B –
R&D $1.28M $1.02B $638.00M
EPS (diluted) $-8.60 $-0.35 $-2.22
Cash & equivalents $9.34M $886.50M –
Total debt $2.07M $13.35B –
Shares (diluted) 2.53M 1.16B 378.10M
Enterprise value -$20.84M $17.32B $3.33B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRMLVTRSBHC
P/E -0.6x -53.2x -3.1x
P/FCF -1.0x 11.0x 1.5x
P/Operating cash flow -1.0x 9.2x –
P/S – 1.5x 0.2x
P/B 0.2x 1.5x –
P/Tangible book 1.5x 36.9x –
EV/EBITDA – 12.5x –
EV/EBIT -0.3x -389.7x –
EV/Revenue – 2.3x –
EV/FCF -0.3x 17.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow -0.3x 14.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 1.74 -0.56

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRMLVTRSBHC
Revenue growth (1Y) – 4.4% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – -1.9% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – -0.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – -6.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -127.6% 96.6% -34.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -166.2% -27.6% 50.6%
Net income growth (1Y) -91.7% 88.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) -125.4% -30.5% –
EPS growth (1Y) 48.6% 88.1% -330.7%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -48.2% -30.6% 5.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -158.2% 12.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -236.9% -3.0% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -158.2% 11.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -236.9% -3.6% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRMLVTRSBHC
Gross margin – 34.8% –
EBITDA margin – 18.4% –
Operating margin – -0.6% –
Pretax margin – -4.5% –
Net margin – -2.8% –
FCF margin – 13.3% –
Operating cash flow margin – 15.8% –
Return on equity -39.8% -2.8% –
Return on assets -34.9% -1.1% –
Return on invested capital – -0.2% –
Return on capital employed -30.5% -0.3% –
Asset turnover – 0.4x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x -5.7x –
Stock comp / revenue – 1.2% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRMLVTRSBHC
Debt / assets 0.5% 38.1% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 0.9x –
Net debt / EBITDA – 4.6x –
Debt / FCF 0.0x 6.8x –
Liabilities / assets 10.9% 59.3% –
Equity / assets 89.1% 40.7% –
Interest coverage -2,872x -0.2x –
Current ratio 10.1x 1.6x –
Quick ratio 7.7x 0.7x –
Cash ratio 7.7x 0.1x –
Altman Z-score – 1.15 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRMLVTRSBHC
Dividend yield – 2.6% –
Net buyback yield -52.6% 1.4% –
Shareholder yield -52.6% 4.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRMLVTRSBHC
Forward P/E – 7.2xFY2026 1.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $2.62FY2026 $4.86FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +11.5%FY2026 +26.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -1.5% -13.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $15.31BFY2026 $11.45BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +7.0%FY2026 +11.9%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -4.8% -0.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRMLVTRSBHC
Held by institutions 12.0% 89.9% 63.3%
Institutions holding 47 1,029 221
Change in shares held, QoQ +96.3% +5.6% +1.9%
Institutions buying 34 487 99
Institutions selling 2 318 63
Buyers to sellers 17.00 1.53 1.57

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRMLVTRSBHC
GRML 1.00 0.08 0.08
VTRS 0.08 1.00 0.21
BHC 0.08 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRML, VTRS and BHC?

Viatris (VTRS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Greenland Mines (GRML) $13.03M, Viatris (VTRS) $22.31B, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $3.33B.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Greenland Mines (GRML) +938.9%, Viatris (VTRS) +82.4%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +12.3%. Over five years, Viatris (VTRS) compounded fastest (Viatris (VTRS) +7.1%/yr, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -24.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Viatris (VTRS) has been the steadiest (Greenland Mines (GRML) 444.8%, Viatris (VTRS) 32.3%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 55.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRML, VTRS and BHC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Viatris (VTRS) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.