GRML vs BHC vs TEVA Stock Comparison

Greenland Mines, Bausch Health Companies and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AMPH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRML Greenland Mines Ltd
$5.70 -61.1% 1M +946.3% 1Y
Market cap
$14.11M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Generic Drugs Healthcare
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries 7, Bausch Health Companies 2, Greenland Mines 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRMLBHCTEVALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $14.11M $2.53B $46.79B TEVA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.6x -2.3x 66.3x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 1.3x 21.0x BHC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — +10.1% +4.1% BHC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — -10.1% 4.1% TEVA
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.6% 6.4% TEVA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 8.9x 5.0x TEVA
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +946.3% +1.6% +106.1% GRML
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -25.6%/yr +35.9%/yr TEVA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 444.8% 54.7% 37.9% TEVA
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 34/100 60/100 66/100 TEVA

Percentile Scorecard

GRMLBHCTEVA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRMLBHCTEVA
Valuation 13 #543 of 625 99 #10 of 625 85 #98 of 625
Growth 2 #588 of 602 44 #338 of 602 83 #102 of 602
Profitability 68 #177 of 551 84 #89 of 551 86 #79 of 551
Financial Health 78 #146 of 656 15 #558 of 656 11 #584 of 656
Shareholder Returns 6 #342 of 365 – –
Overall 34 60 66
  • GRML ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • BHC ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology
  • TEVA ranked among 672 companies in Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRMLBHCTEVASPY
1 month -61.1%+10.7%+3.1% -0.2%
3 months +2,750.0%+39.4%+27.7% +3.9%
6 months +1,163.9%+11.1%+27.8% +8.2%
Year to date +1,872.3%-9.4%+29.5% +12.9%
1 year +946.3%+1.6%+106.1% +12.3%
3 years -46.7%-4.1%+397.7% +87.4%
3 years, per year -18.9%-1.4%+70.8% +23.3%
5 years —-77.2%+362.9% +67.9%
5 years, per year —-25.6%+35.9% +10.9%
10 years —-71.5%-6.3% +261.1%
10 years, per year —-11.8%-0.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGRMLBHCTEVASPY
Volatility, 1Y 444.8%54.7%37.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 158.3%47.8%27.3% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.760.880.75 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.130.032.80 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -99.0%-84.9%-43.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -61.7%-20.3%-2.6% -1.2%
52-week high $14.89$7.90$41.49 $779.14
52-week low $0.17$4.43$19.61 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRMLBHCTEVA
P/E now vs peer median -0.7xmedian 17.2x -2.2xmedian 17.2x 66.7xmedian 17.2x
P/S now vs peer median —median 9.0x 0.2xmedian 9.0x 2.7xmedian 9.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 16.3x 10.0xmedian 16.3x 23.2xmedian 16.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.0xmedian 18.7x 1.6xmedian 18.7x 34.9xmedian 18.7x
P/B now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 2.2x -1.3xmedian 2.2x 6.1xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 0.33 0.03median 0.33 2.10median 0.33

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRMLBHCTEVA
Revenue – $10.85B $17.32B
Gross profit – $7.80B $9.09B
Operating income -$18.67M $883.00M $1.60B
Net income -$21.77M -$1.10B $708.00M
Free cash flow -$14.22M $1.43B $1.35B
R&D $1.28M $663.00M $1.72B
EPS (diluted) $-8.60 $-2.90 $0.61
Cash & equivalents $9.34M $1.83B $3.66B
Total debt $2.07M $20.74B $16.59B
Shares (diluted) 2.53M 378.10M 1.17B
Enterprise value -$19.76M -$3.21B $33.64B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRMLBHCTEVA
P/E -0.7x -2.2x 66.7x
P/FCF -1.0x 1.6x 34.9x
P/Operating cash flow -1.0x 1.3x 24.8x
P/S – 0.2x 2.7x
P/B 0.2x -1.3x 6.1x
P/Tangible book 1.6x -0.4x 10.9x
EV/EBITDA – 10.0x 23.2x
EV/EBIT -0.3x 24.1x 37.4x
EV/Revenue – 2.0x 3.5x
EV/FCF -0.4x 14.9x 44.5x
EV/Operating cash flow -0.4x 11.8x 31.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 0.03 2.10

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRMLBHCTEVA
Revenue growth (1Y) – 10.1% 4.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 9.1% 4.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – 11.8% 10.1%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 9.8% 10.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -127.6% -44.7% 79.3%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -166.2% 14.1% 49.7%
Net income growth (1Y) -91.7% -1,721% 438.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -125.4% -76.0% 31.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 48.6% -1,206% 545.3%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -48.2% -79.0% 31.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -158.2% 19.5% 36.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -236.9% 83.8% 3.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -158.2% 28.3% 51.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -236.9% 62.6% 4.7%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRMLBHCTEVA
Gross margin – 71.8% 52.5%
EBITDA margin – 19.6% 15.0%
Operating margin – 8.1% 9.3%
Pretax margin – -6.7% 4.1%
Net margin – -10.1% 4.1%
FCF margin – 13.2% 7.8%
Operating cash flow margin – 16.6% 11.0%
Return on equity -39.8% – 8.9%
Return on assets -34.9% -4.4% 1.8%
Return on invested capital – 4.6% 6.4%
Return on capital employed -30.5% 4.4% 6.6%
Asset turnover – 0.4x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.7x -1.6x 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue – 2.1% 1.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRMLBHCTEVA
Debt / assets 0.5% 83.7% 41.6%
Debt / equity 0.0x -11.7x 2.1x
Net debt / EBITDA – 8.9x 5.0x
Debt / FCF 0.0x 14.5x 12.3x
Liabilities / assets 10.9% 107.1% 80.5%
Equity / assets 89.1% -7.1% 19.5%
Interest coverage -2,872x 0.5x –
Current ratio 10.1x 1.4x 0.9x
Quick ratio 7.7x 0.9x 0.5x
Cash ratio 7.7x 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score – 0.09 0.90

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRMLBHCTEVA
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -50.3% – –
Shareholder yield -50.3% 0.0% 0.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRMLBHCTEVA
Forward P/E – 1.3xFY2026 21.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $4.86FY2026 $1.92FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +26.9%FY2026 -32.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – -13.4% +66.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $11.45BFY2026 $15.65BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +11.9%FY2026 -6.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – -0.5% +17.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRMLBHCTEVA
Held by institutions 12.0% 63.3% 62.7%
Institutions holding 47 221 670
Change in shares held, QoQ +96.3% +1.9% +8.6%
Institutions buying 34 99 359
Institutions selling 2 63 190
Buyers to sellers 17.00 1.57 1.89

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRMLBHCTEVA
GRML 1.00 0.09 0.01
BHC 0.09 1.00 0.19
TEVA 0.01 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRML, BHC and TEVA?

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Greenland Mines (GRML) $14.11M, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) $2.53B, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) $46.79B.

Which company is growing faster?

Bausch Health Companies (BHC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +10.1%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) +4.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) has the highest net margin (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -10.1%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) 4.1%). On return on invested capital, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) leads (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 4.6%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) 6.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Greenland Mines (GRML) returned the most: Greenland Mines (GRML) +946.3%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) +1.6%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) +106.1%. Over five years, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) compounded fastest (Bausch Health Companies (BHC) -25.6%/yr, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) +35.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) has been the steadiest (Greenland Mines (GRML) 444.8%, Bausch Health Companies (BHC) 54.7%, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) 37.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRML, BHC and TEVA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries (TEVA) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.