GRAB vs MRT vs BABA Stock Comparison

Grab Holdings, Marti Technologies and Alibaba Group Holding Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DASH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.71 -13.4% 1M -53.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.11B
P/E
19.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
4 wins
MRT Marti Technologies, Inc.
$2.00 -6.5% 1M -17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$154.27M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$52.32M
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins
BABA Alibaba Group Holding Ltd
$100.26 -8.7% 1M -42.6% 1Y
Market cap
$232.68B
P/E
22.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$150.46B
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Alibaba Group Holding leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Alibaba Group Holding 4, Grab Holdings 4, Marti Technologies 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRABMRTBABALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.11B $154.27M $232.68B BABA
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.5x -3.9x 22.1x GRAB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.9x — 14.3x BABA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.5% +174.4% +8.1% MRT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.3% -74.9% 7.0% GRAB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% — 2.4% BABA
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -7.2x — MRT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.7% -17.0% -42.6% MRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.2%/yr -27.4%/yr -9.9%/yr BABA
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.7% 56.1% 40.4% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 25/100 46/100 GRAB

Percentile Scorecard

GRABMRTBABA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRABMRTBABA
Valuation 46 #90 of 167 9 #152 of 167 70 #51 of 167
Growth 80 #32 of 153 59 #64 of 153 17 #127 of 153
Profitability 45 #84 of 153 16 #128 of 153 53 #72 of 153
Financial Health 51 #89 of 179 15 #153 of 179 59 #74 of 179
Shareholder Returns – – 30 #66 of 94
Overall 56 25 46
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • MRT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • BABA ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRABMRTBABASPY
1 month -13.4%-6.5%-8.7% -0.8%
3 months -19.1%+7.5%-12.8% +3.5%
6 months -30.3%-6.1%-24.3% +7.0%
Year to date -45.7%-15.6%-31.6% +12.2%
1 year -53.7%-17.0%-42.6% +13.0%
3 years -10.6%+300.0%+21.1% +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.7%+58.8%+6.6% +23.1%
5 years -79.5%-79.8%-40.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.2%-27.4%-9.9% +11.0%
10 years ——-2.5% +258.0%
10 years, per year ——-0.2% +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGRABMRTBABASPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.7%56.1%40.4% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.5%56.1%36.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.390.021.11 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.39-0.30-1.06 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.5%-96.8%-62.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.7%-24.0%-44.3% -1.8%
52-week high $6.12$2.63$179.97 $779.14
52-week low $2.71$1.30$94.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRABMRTBABA
P/E now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 17.5x -4.0xmedian 17.5x 22.1xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.4x 3.3xmedian 1.4x 1.5xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.5xmedian 14.5x -20.4xmedian 14.5x —median 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 55.7xmedian 12.1x -8.7xmedian 12.1x 7.0xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.7x -2.1xmedian 1.7x 1.4xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.41 -0.11median 0.41 -15.35median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRABMRTBABA
Revenue $3.73B $52.32M $150.46B
Gross profit $1.63B $33.36M $57.45B
Operating income $120.00M -$16.33M $4.39B
Net income $525.00M -$70.58M $10.08B
Free cash flow $193.00M -$19.81M $33.19B
R&D $417.00M $3.04M $10.68B
EPS (diluted) $0.14 $-0.50 $4.38
Cash & equivalents $2.86B $12.50M $21.06B
Total debt $2.99B $106.33M $83.76B
Shares (diluted) 4.21B 78.05M 2.40B
Enterprise value -$4.01B $124.99M $46.32B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRABMRTBABA
P/E 19.4x -4.0x 22.1x
P/FCF 55.7x -8.7x 7.0x
P/Operating cash flow 82.7x -8.6x 20.6x
P/S 2.9x 3.3x 1.5x
P/B 1.6x -2.1x 1.4x
P/Tangible book 1.6x -2.0x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 26.5x -20.4x –
EV/EBIT 71.9x -16.3x 48.0x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 5.1x 1.4x
EV/FCF 44.7x -13.4x 6.3x
EV/Operating cash flow 66.3x -13.3x 18.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – -0.11 -15.35

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRABMRTBABA
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.5% 174.4% 8.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.6% – 5.6%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.6% 5,402% 0.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 69.9% – 6.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) 340.0% 45.7% -77.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% – -35.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 837.5% 38.6% -50.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.1% -38.7% -3.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 82.0% 60.5% -47.9%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 35.1% -1.4%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -82.1% 44.4% -45.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.4% -20.4% -27.8%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.7% 45.0% -8.5%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.6% -20.1% -0.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRABMRTBABA
Gross margin 43.6% 63.8% 38.2%
EBITDA margin 8.7% -24.9% –
Operating margin 3.2% -31.2% 2.9%
Pretax margin 13.9% -74.9% 9.7%
Net margin 15.3% -74.9% 7.0%
FCF margin 5.2% -37.9% 22.1%
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% -38.2% 7.5%
Return on equity 7.9% – 6.2%
Return on assets 4.2% -136.6% 3.6%
Return on invested capital 1.5% – 2.4%
Return on capital employed 1.7% -105.8% 2.1%
Asset turnover 0.3x 1.8x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 0.3x 1.1x
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% 17.9% 1.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRABMRTBABA
Debt / assets 15.1% 328.6% 7.5%
Debt / equity 0.3x -1.3x 0.1x
Net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -7.2x –
Debt / FCF 10.5x -5.4x 0.6x
Liabilities / assets 49.7% 359.1% 43.6%
Equity / assets 50.3% -259.1% 56.4%
Interest coverage 1.1x – 3.2x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.4x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 1.0x 0.6x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.9x 0.6x
Altman Z-score -0.27 -7.68 2.30

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRABMRTBABA
Dividend yield – – 1.0%
Net buyback yield – – –
Shareholder yield – 0.0% 1.0%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRABMRTBABA
Forward P/E 16.9xFY2026 – 14.3xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 $-0.32FY2026 $7.02FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +166.7%FY2026 – +80.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.5% – +22.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.07BFY2026 $82.00MFY2026 $174.00BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 +109.0%FY2026 +17.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +33.7% +72.1% +14.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRABMRTBABA
Held by institutions 75.6% – 10.1%
Institutions holding 483 – 1,218
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% – -5.4%
Institutions buying 231 – 555
Institutions selling 168 – 421
Buyers to sellers 1.38 – 1.32

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRABMRTBABA
GRAB 1.00 -0.07 0.27
MRT -0.07 1.00 0.08
BABA 0.27 0.08 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRAB, MRT and BABA?

Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.11B, Marti Technologies (MRT) $154.27M, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) $232.68B.

Which stock is cheaper, GRAB, MRT and BABA?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.5x, Marti Technologies (MRT) -3.9x, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 22.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) is cheapest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 16.9x, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 14.3x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Marti Technologies (MRT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%, Marti Technologies (MRT) +174.4%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) +8.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Grab Holdings (GRAB) has the highest net margin (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%, Marti Technologies (MRT) -74.9%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 7.0%). On return on invested capital, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) leads (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 2.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Marti Technologies (MRT) returned the most: Grab Holdings (GRAB) -53.7%, Marti Technologies (MRT) -17.0%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) -42.6%. Over five years, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) compounded fastest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) -27.2%/yr, Marti Technologies (MRT) -27.4%/yr, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) -9.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.7%, Marti Technologies (MRT) 56.1%, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) 40.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRAB, MRT and BABA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Alibaba Group Holding (BABA) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.