GRAB vs LYFT vs DASH Stock Comparison

Grab Holdings, Lyft and DoorDash Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MRT) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GRAB Grab Holdings Ltd
$2.71 -13.4% 1M -53.7% 1Y
Market cap
$11.21B
P/E
19.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.73B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins
LYFT Lyft, Inc.
$17.06 +14.8% 1M -16.7% 1Y
Market cap
$6.44B
P/E
2.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$6.77B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
5 wins
DASH DoorDash, Inc.
$168.44 -12.9% 1M -34.8% 1Y
Market cap
$75.27B
P/E
89.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.89B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Lyft leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Lyft 5, DoorDash 3, Grab Holdings 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGRABLYFTDASHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $11.21B $6.44B $75.27B DASH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.6x 2.2x 89.5x LYFT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 16.9x 29.9x 60.6x GRAB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +21.5% +10.8% +33.6% DASH
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.3% 42.3% 5.3% LYFT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.5% 0.0% — GRAB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -25.9x — LYFT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -53.7% -16.7% -34.8% LYFT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.2%/yr -18.3%/yr -3.3%/yr DASH
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 38.7% 48.0% 50.1% GRAB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 56/100 70/100 54/100 LYFT

Percentile Scorecard

GRABLYFTDASH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGRABLYFTDASH
Valuation 46 #90 of 167 81 #33 of 167 27 #122 of 167
Growth 80 #32 of 153 89 #18 of 153 82 #28 of 153
Profitability 45 #84 of 153 56 #68 of 153 62 #59 of 153
Financial Health 51 #89 of 179 46 #98 of 179 57 #77 of 179
Shareholder Returns – 80 #20 of 94 43 #54 of 94
Overall 56 70 54
  • GRAB ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • LYFT ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • DASH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGRABLYFTDASHSPY
1 month -13.4%+14.8%-12.9% -0.8%
3 months -19.1%+13.1%-8.6% +3.5%
6 months -30.3%+17.7%-3.2% +7.0%
Year to date -45.7%-11.9%-25.6% +12.2%
1 year -53.7%-16.7%-34.8% +13.0%
3 years -10.6%+84.2%+138.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year -3.7%+22.6%+33.6% +23.1%
5 years -79.5%-63.5%-15.3% +68.6%
5 years, per year -27.2%-18.3%-3.3% +11.0%

Risk

MeasureGRABLYFTDASHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 38.7%48.0%50.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 39.5%53.9%53.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.391.391.39 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -1.39-0.35-0.69 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -86.5%-85.8%-82.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -55.7%-30.6%-36.7% -1.8%
52-week high $6.12$24.57$266.06 $779.14
52-week low $2.71$12.65$146.60 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGRABLYFTDASH
P/E now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 17.5x 2.3xmedian 17.5x 87.0xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 2.9xmedian 1.4x 1.0xmedian 1.4x 4.6xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.5xmedian 14.5x 182.3xmedian 14.5x 37.6xmedian 14.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 55.7xmedian 12.1x 5.8xmedian 12.1x 28.1xmedian 12.1x
P/B now vs peer median 1.6xmedian 1.7x 2.1xmedian 1.7x 7.4xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.41 0.04median 0.41 2.33median 0.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGRABLYFTDASH
Revenue $3.73B $6.77B $15.89B
Gross profit $1.63B $3.08B $8.17B
Operating income $120.00M -$119.72M $712.00M
Net income $525.00M $2.87B $841.00M
Free cash flow $193.00M $1.11B $2.60B
R&D $417.00M $472.97M $1.71B
EPS (diluted) $0.14 $7.42 $1.91
Cash & equivalents $2.86B $1.14B $4.42B
Total debt $2.99B $990.56M –
Shares (diluted) 4.21B 386.33M 439.35M
Enterprise value -$3.91B -$908.92M $54.65B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTDASH
P/E 19.4x 2.3x 87.0x
P/FCF 55.7x 5.8x 28.1x
P/Operating cash flow 82.7x 5.4x 25.8x
P/S 2.9x 1.0x 4.6x
P/B 1.6x 2.1x 7.4x
P/Tangible book 1.6x 2.3x 9.2x
EV/EBITDA 26.5x 182.3x 37.6x
EV/EBIT 71.9x -47.2x 95.0x
EV/Revenue 2.3x 0.8x 4.3x
EV/FCF 44.7x 5.1x 26.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 66.3x 4.7x 23.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.04 2.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTDASH
Revenue growth (1Y) 21.5% 10.8% 33.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.6% 16.8% 27.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 23.6% 20.9% 37.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 69.9% 20.8% 32.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 340.0% -117.1% 31.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.7% 54.4% 38.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 837.5% 3,009% 7.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 35.1% 61.1% 38.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 82.0% 3,303% 7.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 60.8% 37.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -82.1% 14.0% 29.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 34.4% 98.9% 40.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -76.7% 12.0% 30.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 40.6% 72.6% 45.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTDASH
Gross margin 43.6% 45.5% 51.4%
EBITDA margin 8.7% 0.5% 11.3%
Operating margin 3.2% -1.8% 4.5%
Pretax margin 13.9% -0.1% 5.5%
Net margin 15.3% 42.3% 5.3%
FCF margin 5.2% 16.4% 16.3%
Operating cash flow margin 3.5% 17.6% 17.8%
Return on equity 7.9% 94.7% 8.3%
Return on assets 4.2% 31.8% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 1.5% 0.0% –
Return on capital employed 1.7% -2.9% 5.3%
Asset turnover 0.3x 0.8x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.2x 0.4x 3.4x
Stock comp / revenue 6.4% 4.6% 7.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTDASH
Debt / assets 15.1% 10.9% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.3x –
Net debt / EBITDA -6.5x -25.9x –
Debt / FCF 10.5x 0.9x –
Liabilities / assets 49.7% 66.8% 49.3%
Equity / assets 50.3% 33.2% 50.7%
Interest coverage 1.1x -5.9x –
Current ratio 1.5x 0.6x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.8x 0.4x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.4x 0.9x
Altman Z-score -0.27 -0.06 5.26

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGRABLYFTDASH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield – 10.7% 1.4%
Shareholder yield – 10.7% 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGRABLYFTDASH
Forward P/E 16.9xFY2026 29.9xFY2026 60.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $0.16FY2026 $0.57FY2026 $2.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +166.7%FY2026 -91.6%FY2026 +30.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +12.5% +80.7% +79.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.07BFY2026 $6.97BFY2026 $18.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +20.9%FY2026 +10.3%FY2026 +37.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +33.7% +11.1% +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGRABLYFTDASH
Held by institutions 75.6% 100.0% 88.2%
Institutions holding 483 528 1,043
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.9% +5.2% +7.4%
Institutions buying 231 260 578
Institutions selling 168 175 349
Buyers to sellers 1.38 1.49 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GRABLYFTDASH
GRAB 1.00 0.44 0.38
LYFT 0.44 1.00 0.39
DASH 0.38 0.39 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GRAB, LYFT and DASH?

DoorDash (DASH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Grab Holdings (GRAB) $11.21B, Lyft (LYFT) $6.44B, DoorDash (DASH) $75.27B.

Which stock is cheaper, GRAB, LYFT and DASH?

Lyft (LYFT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 19.6x, Lyft (LYFT) 2.2x, DoorDash (DASH) 89.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Grab Holdings (GRAB) is cheapest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 16.9x, Lyft (LYFT) 29.9x, DoorDash (DASH) 60.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

DoorDash (DASH) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Grab Holdings (GRAB) +21.5%, Lyft (LYFT) +10.8%, DoorDash (DASH) +33.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Lyft (LYFT) has the highest net margin (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 15.3%, Lyft (LYFT) 42.3%, DoorDash (DASH) 5.3%). On return on invested capital, Grab Holdings (GRAB) leads (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 1.5%, Lyft (LYFT) 0.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Lyft (LYFT) returned the most: Grab Holdings (GRAB) -53.7%, Lyft (LYFT) -16.7%, DoorDash (DASH) -34.8%. Over five years, DoorDash (DASH) compounded fastest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) -27.2%/yr, Lyft (LYFT) -18.3%/yr, DoorDash (DASH) -3.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Grab Holdings (GRAB) has been the steadiest (Grab Holdings (GRAB) 38.7%, Lyft (LYFT) 48.0%, DoorDash (DASH) 50.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GRAB, LYFT and DASH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Lyft (LYFT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.