GMTL vs CPAC vs LOGC Stock Comparison

Guardian Metal Resources, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa and ContextLogic Holdings Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (EAF) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.

Head to Head

5 decided of 12

Cementos Pacasmayo Saa leads on 3 of the 12 questions below (Cementos Pacasmayo Saa 3, ContextLogic Holdings 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGMTLCPACLOGCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $297.06M $1.09B $704.35M CPAC
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -30.5x 25.1x -306.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 14.0x — –
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months — — +20.3% –
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months — — -2.9% –
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 6.0x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +71.9% +99.2% LOGC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +15.3%/yr -36.6%/yr CPAC
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 91.1% 53.0% 27.3% LOGC
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers — 44/100 30/100 CPAC

Percentile Scorecard

GMTLCPACLOGC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGMTLCPACLOGC
Valuation 29 #115 of 162 33 #7 of 10 44 #91 of 162
Growth – – 10 #133 of 147
Profitability – – 38 #76 of 122
Financial Health 95 #9 of 165 0 #9 of 9 29 #118 of 165
Shareholder Returns – 100 #1 of 8 28 #77 of 107
Overall – 44 30
  • GMTL ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining
  • CPAC ranked among 10 companies in Construction Materials
  • LOGC ranked among 176 companies in Metals and Mining

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGMTLCPACLOGCSPY
1 month -48.0%+4.7%+3.3% -0.8%
3 months -53.2%+6.2%+62.5% +3.5%
6 months -74.3%+18.7%+79.3% +7.0%
Year to date —+22.6%+101.1% +12.2%
1 year —+71.9%+99.2% +13.0%
3 years —+158.5%+315.3% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+37.3%+60.8% +23.1%
5 years —+104.0%-89.8% +68.6%
5 years, per year —+15.3%-36.6% +11.0%
10 years —+33.0%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+2.9%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGMTLCPACLOGCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 91.1%53.0%27.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 91.7%31.4%25.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.290.040.34 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —1.363.63 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.4%-36.7%-97.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high -74.3%0.0%0.0% -1.8%
52-week high $20.64$12.77$15.24 $779.14
52-week low $4.88$6.38$7.05 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGMTLCPACLOGC
P/E now vs peer median -30.5xmedian 12.8x 25.1xmedian 19.6x -303.1xmedian 12.8x
P/S now vs peer median —median 3.1x 1.8xmedian 1.8x 8.8xmedian 3.1x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median —median 7.0x —median 9.3x 27.0xmedian 7.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -50.9xmedian 15.2x 14.9xmedian 31.4x -16.0xmedian 15.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.1x 3.1xmedian 2.3x 0.9xmedian 2.1x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.29 —median 2.78 —median 0.29

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGMTLCPACLOGC
Revenue – – $79.50M
Gross profit – – $41.90M
Operating income – – -$9.90M
Net income – – -$300.00K
Free cash flow – – -$43.60M
EPS (diluted) – – $-0.05
Cash & equivalents $52.46M $15.93M $11.00M
Total debt – $2.77B $211.50M
Shares (diluted) 57.79M – 45.74M
Enterprise value $297.06M $877.95M $311.55M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACLOGC
P/E -30.5x 25.1x -303.1x
P/FCF -50.9x 14.9x -16.0x
P/Operating cash flow – – -17.6x
P/S – 1.8x 8.8x
P/B 3.3x 3.1x 0.9x
P/Tangible book 5.8x 3.1x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA – – 27.0x
EV/EBIT – – -90.7x
EV/Revenue – – 11.3x
EV/FCF – – -20.6x
EV/Operating cash flow – – -22.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – – –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACLOGC
Revenue growth (1Y) – – 20.3%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – – –
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – 63.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) – – -186.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – – –
Net income growth (1Y) – – -106.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – – –
EPS growth (1Y) – – -129.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – – -590.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – – -1,218%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – – –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACLOGC
Gross margin – – 52.7%
EBITDA margin – – 41.8%
Operating margin – – -12.5%
Pretax margin – – -19.6%
Net margin – – -2.9%
FCF margin – – -54.8%
Operating cash flow margin – – -49.9%
Return on equity – – -2.1%
Return on assets – – -1.6%
Return on invested capital – – –
Return on capital employed – – -1.0%
Asset turnover – – 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) – – 132.3x
Stock comp / revenue – – 14.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACLOGC
Debt / assets – 28.4% 21.8%
Debt / equity – 0.7x 0.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 6.0x
Debt / FCF – – -4.9x
Liabilities / assets 3.7% 61.6% 24.0%
Equity / assets 96.3% 38.4% 76.0%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 15.3x 1.1x 1.9x
Quick ratio 14.8x 0.4x 1.2x
Cash ratio 14.4x 0.2x 0.5x
Altman Z-score – – -2.97

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGMTLCPACLOGC
Dividend yield – 4.8% –
Net buyback yield – – -3.7%
Shareholder yield – 4.8% -3.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGMTLCPACLOGC
Forward P/E – 14.0xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.25FY2027 $0.91FY2026 $-0.17FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +68.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +5.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $0.00FY2027 $680.11MFY2026 $0.00FY2025
Revenue growth, next FY – +7.8%FY2026 -100.0%FY2025
Revenue growth, the year after – -2.3% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGMTLCPACLOGC
Held by institutions 10.6% 1.4% –
Institutions holding 47 26 –
Change in shares held, QoQ +16.7% +76.6% –
Institutions buying 36 17 –
Institutions selling 10 4 –
Buyers to sellers 3.60 4.25 –

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GMTLCPACLOGC
GMTL 1.00 0.02 0.16
CPAC 0.02 1.00 -0.04
LOGC 0.16 -0.04 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GMTL, CPAC and LOGC?

Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) is the largest by market capitalisation: Guardian Metal Resources (GMTL) $297.06M, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) $1.09B, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) $704.35M.

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) returned the most: Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) +71.9%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) +99.2%. Over five years, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) compounded fastest (Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) +15.3%/yr, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) -36.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) has been the steadiest (Guardian Metal Resources (GMTL) 91.1%, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) 53.0%, ContextLogic Holdings (LOGC) 27.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GMTL, CPAC and LOGC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Cementos Pacasmayo Saa (CPAC) leads on 3. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.