GLXZ vs TTWO vs PLTK Stock Comparison

Galaxy Gaming, Take Two Interactive Software and Playtika Holding Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DDI) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GLXZ Galaxy Gaming, Inc.
$1.62 +5.9% 1M -37.2% 1Y
Market cap
$41.07M
P/E
8.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$31.16M
Div. yield
–
Video Games Technology
3 wins
PLTK Playtika Holding Corp.
$2.31 +0.9% 1M -38.4% 1Y
Market cap
$884.04M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.83B
Div. yield
4.33%
Video Games Technology
1 win

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Take Two Interactive Software leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Take Two Interactive Software 6, Galaxy Gaming 3, Playtika Holding 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLXZTTWOPLTKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $41.07M $39.90B $884.04M TTWO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 8.6x -124.0x -3.2x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 31.1x 8.0x PLTK
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +2.1% +15.3% +3.7% TTWO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 15.8% -4.8% -9.8% GLXZ
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 36.2% -2.7% -4.0% GLXZ
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.8x 1.0x 16.2x TTWO
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 4.33% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -37.2% -16.3% -38.4% TTWO
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -17.4%/yr +2.7%/yr -37.2%/yr TTWO
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.6% 34.8% 61.0% TTWO
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 42/100 46/100 GLXZ

Percentile Scorecard

GLXZTTWOPLTK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLXZTTWOPLTK
Valuation 89 #19 of 166 19 #135 of 166 82 #30 of 166
Growth 70 #47 of 154 91 #15 of 154 17 #128 of 154
Profitability 97 #5 of 154 37 #97 of 154 49 #79 of 154
Financial Health 26 #132 of 179 35 #116 of 179 21 #142 of 179
Shareholder Returns 28 #70 of 97 27 #71 of 97 58 #41 of 97
Overall 62 42 46
  • GLXZ ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • TTWO ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • PLTK ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLXZTTWOPLTKSPY
1 month +5.9%+5.3%+0.9% -5.9%
3 months +1.9%-8.2%-29.8% -4.6%
6 months -14.7%-4.5%-35.8% +0.2%
Year to date -43.4%-16.7%-41.5% +7.5%
1 year -37.2%-16.3%-38.4% +8.2%
3 years -41.1%+58.8%-73.1% +68.3%
3 years, per year -16.2%+16.7%-35.4% +19.0%
5 years -61.5%+14.0%-90.2% +56.5%
5 years, per year -17.4%+2.7%-37.2% +9.4%
10 years +224.0%+341.7%— +251.5%
10 years, per year +12.5%+16.0%— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureGLXZTTWOPLTKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.6%34.8%61.0% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 54.6%35.3%66.8% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.180.550.63 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.76-0.47-0.63 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -76.0%-50.2%-91.6% -25.4%
From 52-week high -45.1%-17.4%-47.1% -5.9%
52-week high $2.95$258.41$4.37 $779.14
52-week low $1.50$189.69$1.97 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLXZTTWOPLTK
P/E now vs peer median 8.6xmedian 18.0x -124.0xmedian 18.0x -3.2xmedian 18.0x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 1.3x 6.0xmedian 1.3x 0.3xmedian 1.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 6.2xmedian 15.5x 56.1xmedian 15.5x 24.3xmedian 15.5x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.5xmedian 11.4x 118.2xmedian 11.4x 1.8xmedian 11.4x
P/B now vs peer median -2.7xmedian 1.7x 11.1xmedian 1.7x -2.5xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.04median 0.38 -3.32median 0.38 0.07median 0.38

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLXZTTWOPLTK
Revenue $31.16M $6.69B $2.83B
Gross profit $30.61M $3.75B $2.08B
Operating income $8.33M -$161.30M -$79.80M
Net income $4.92M -$320.40M -$278.40M
Free cash flow $7.41M $337.50M $481.30M
R&D $605.98K $1.09B $390.80M
EPS (diluted) $0.19 $-1.88 $-0.73
Cash & equivalents $4.76M $1.36B $574.90M
Total debt $37.89M $2.52B $2.38B
Shares (diluted) 26.13M 170.10M 382.90M
Enterprise value $23.82M $31.61B -$1.75B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLXZTTWOPLTK
P/E 8.6x -124.0x -3.2x
P/FCF 5.5x 118.2x 1.8x
P/Operating cash flow 5.5x 79.8x 1.7x
P/S 1.3x 6.0x 0.3x
P/B -2.7x 11.1x -2.5x
P/Tangible book -1.6x 18.9x -1.3x
EV/EBITDA 6.2x 56.1x 24.3x
EV/EBIT 8.9x -251.7x -33.5x
EV/Revenue 2.4x 6.1x 0.9x
EV/FCF 10.0x 120.3x 5.5x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.9x 81.2x 5.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.04 -3.32 0.07

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLXZTTWOPLTK
Revenue growth (1Y) 2.1% 15.3% 3.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 5.2% 6.5% 3.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 3.2% 15.8% 5.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 5.8% 17.7% 4.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 67.8% 96.1% -124.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 0.4% 50.5% -29.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 218.5% 92.4% -423.0%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 210.5% 36.1% -43.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 218.8% 92.4% -410.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 208.1% 37.4% -43.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 64.5% 394.8% 17.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.2% 93.8% -0.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 65.6% 678.9% 21.4%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 3.3% 46.9% 1.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLXZTTWOPLTK
Gross margin 98.2% 56.0% 73.6%
EBITDA margin 38.6% 10.8% 3.9%
Operating margin 26.7% -2.4% -2.8%
Pretax margin 16.1% -3.5% -8.1%
Net margin 15.8% -4.8% -9.8%
FCF margin 23.8% 5.0% 17.0%
Operating cash flow margin 24.1% 7.5% 18.0%
Return on equity – -9.0% –
Return on assets 18.2% -3.5% -8.4%
Return on invested capital 36.2% -2.7% -4.0%
Return on capital employed 41.7% -2.5% -3.0%
Asset turnover 1.2x 0.7x 0.9x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x -1.6x -1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 5.2% 1.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLXZTTWOPLTK
Debt / assets 140.6% 27.8% 71.1%
Debt / equity -2.5x 0.7x -6.6x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.8x 1.0x 16.2x
Debt / FCF 5.1x 7.5x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 156.2% 60.2% 110.7%
Equity / assets -56.2% 39.8% -10.7%
Interest coverage 2.6x – -0.5x
Current ratio 1.5x 1.1x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.7x 0.9x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.7x 0.7x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 1.07 3.95 0.43

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLXZTTWOPLTK
Dividend yield – – 4.3%
Net buyback yield -0.1% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield -0.1% -0.1% 4.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLXZTTWOPLTK
Forward P/E – 31.1xFY2026 8.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.85FY2026 $0.29FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +67.1%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after – +57.4% +131.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $8.09BFY2026 $2.94BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +20.4%FY2026 +6.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +19.1% -1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLXZTTWOPLTK
Held by institutions 0.9% 97.0% 15.6%
Institutions holding 2 1,118 172
Change in shares held, QoQ – +10.9% -0.9%
Institutions buying 0 637 92
Institutions selling 0 319 59
Buyers to sellers – 2.00 1.56

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLXZTTWOPLTK
GLXZ 1.00 -0.06 -0.01
TTWO -0.06 1.00 0.24
PLTK -0.01 0.24 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLXZ, TTWO and PLTK?

Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) is the largest by market capitalisation: Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) $41.07M, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) $39.90B, Playtika Holding (PLTK) $884.04M.

Which company is growing faster?

Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) +2.1%, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) +15.3%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) has the highest net margin (Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 15.8%, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) -4.8%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -9.8%). On return on invested capital, Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) leads (Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 36.2%, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) -2.7%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -4.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) returned the most: Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) -37.2%, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) -16.3%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -38.4%. Over five years, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) compounded fastest (Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) -17.4%/yr, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) +2.7%/yr, Playtika Holding (PLTK) -37.2%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) 0.00%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) 4.33%. Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) and Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) has been the steadiest (Galaxy Gaming (GLXZ) 48.6%, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) 34.8%, Playtika Holding (PLTK) 61.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLXZ, TTWO and PLTK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Take Two Interactive Software (TTWO) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.