GLW vs PURE vs ESI Stock Comparison

Corning, Pure Bioscience and Element Solutions Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GLW Corning Inc /Ny
$128.89 -18.8% 1M +42.8% 1Y
Market cap
$111.03B
P/E
51.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.72B
Div. yield
0.87%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
6 wins
PURE Pure Bioscience, Inc.
$0.08 +14.3% 1M 0.0% 1Y
Market cap
$10.40M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.32M
Div. yield
–
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
1 win
ESI Element Solutions Inc
$35.39 -1.6% 1M +33.9% 1Y
Market cap
$8.59B
P/E
42.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.49B
Div. yield
0.90%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Corning leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Corning 6, Element Solutions 5, Pure Bioscience 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLWPUREESILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $111.03B $10.40M $8.59B GLW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 51.7x -3.8x 42.0x ESI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.4x — 20.6x ESI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.8% +5.3% +39.6% ESI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.1% -107.1% 5.9% GLW
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.0% — 5.4% GLW
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x -5.0x 3.2x PURE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.87% — 0.90% ESI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +42.8% 0.0% +33.9% GLW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.4%/yr -26.8%/yr +9.3%/yr GLW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.5% 160.1% 47.0% ESI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 27/100 48/100 GLW

Percentile Scorecard

GLWPUREESI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLWPUREESI
Valuation 23 #73 of 94 7 #88 of 94 38 #59 of 94
Growth 96 #5 of 92 76 #23 of 92 75 #24 of 92
Profitability 85 #14 of 86 21 #68 of 86 58 #37 of 86
Financial Health 60 #38 of 93 3 #90 of 93 42 #54 of 93
Shareholder Returns 33 #48 of 71 – 29 #51 of 71
Overall 59 27 48
  • GLW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • PURE ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • ESI ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLWPUREESISPY
1 month -18.8%+14.3%-1.6% +0.7%
3 months -4.8%+33.3%-0.6% +3.7%
6 months -21.5%+14.3%-16.9% +7.1%
Year to date +47.2%+100.0%+41.6% +12.8%
1 year +42.8%0.0%+33.9% +11.9%
3 years +383.5%-20.0%+94.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +69.2%-7.2%+24.8% +22.8%
5 years +262.4%-78.9%+55.8% +67.6%
5 years, per year +29.4%-26.8%+9.3% +10.9%
10 years +468.3%-92.1%+391.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +19.0%-22.4%+17.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGLWPUREESISPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.5%160.1%47.0% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.3%273.1%47.4% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.03-0.262.19 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.570.000.72 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.6%-89.2%-40.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.6%-20.0%-27.9% -1.2%
52-week high $255.69$0.10$49.09 $779.14
52-week low $78.03$0.04$22.99 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLWPUREESI
P/E now vs peer median 51.7xmedian 21.0x -3.8xmedian 21.0x 42.0xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 1.4x 4.5xmedian 1.4x 2.5xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.5xmedian 12.9x -10.6xmedian 12.9x 18.1xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 45.1xmedian 15.5x -6.0xmedian 15.5x 46.9xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 1.7x -1.6xmedian 1.7x 3.0xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.97median 1.68 -0.24median 1.68 0.75median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLWPUREESI
Revenue $17.72B $2.32M $3.49B
Gross profit $6.46B $1.33M $1.28B
Operating income $2.92B -$2.08M $408.70M
Net income $2.35B -$2.48M $205.20M
Free cash flow $2.46B -$1.74M $182.90M
R&D $1.18B $332.00K $80.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.47 $-0.02 $0.84
Cash & equivalents $2.54B $569.00K $224.90M
Total debt $8.23B $9.98M $2.08B
Shares (diluted) 871.00M 116.46M 243.70M
Enterprise value $103.32B $8.22M $7.38B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLWPUREESI
P/E 51.7x -3.8x 42.0x
P/FCF 45.1x -6.0x 46.9x
P/Operating cash flow 26.5x -6.0x 30.3x
P/S 6.3x 4.5x 2.5x
P/B 7.8x -1.6x 3.0x
P/Tangible book 8.1x -1.6x 4.5x
EV/EBITDA 26.5x -10.6x 18.1x
EV/EBIT 40.0x -9.5x 25.6x
EV/Revenue 6.6x 8.5x 3.0x
EV/FCF 47.4x -11.4x 57.1x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.8x -11.4x 36.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.97 -0.24 0.75

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLWPUREESI
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.8% 5.3% 39.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.9% 7.3% 14.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 21.4% 1.8% 21.5%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.0% 10.9% 11.7%
Operating income growth (1Y) 46.0% 8.3% 17.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 48.2% 19.2% 31.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 57.2% -3.5% -14.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 53.6% 14.4% 56.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 56.9% 0.6% -15.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 53.6% 15.7% 55.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 85.0% 13.7% -16.0%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.0% 19.1% -4.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 111.8% 13.7% -32.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.0% 19.3% -12.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLWPUREESI
Gross margin 36.5% 57.2% 36.6%
EBITDA margin 24.9% -81.0% 16.6%
Operating margin 16.5% -89.9% 11.7%
Pretax margin 15.9% -107.4% 9.0%
Net margin 12.1% -107.1% 5.9%
FCF margin 13.9% -75.0% 5.2%
Operating cash flow margin 23.7% -75.0% 8.1%
Return on equity 17.1% – 7.2%
Return on assets 7.0% -181.0% 3.5%
Return on invested capital 11.0% – 5.4%
Return on capital employed 10.8% – 7.8%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 0.7x 1.4x
Stock comp / revenue 2.1% 8.5% 2.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLWPUREESI
Debt / assets 24.1% 836.8% 35.5%
Debt / equity 0.6x -1.6x 0.7x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x -5.0x 3.2x
Debt / FCF 3.3x -5.7x 11.4x
Liabilities / assets 58.1% 636.4% 50.7%
Equity / assets 41.9% -536.4% 49.3%
Interest coverage 8.0x -5.1x –
Current ratio 1.7x 0.3x 2.8x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.2x 1.7x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.1x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 5.04 -172.23 2.58

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLWPUREESI
Dividend yield 0.9% – 0.9%
Net buyback yield -0.5% – 0.5%
Shareholder yield 0.4% – 1.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 43.1% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 41.1% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.9% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.2% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLWPUREESI
Forward P/E 37.4xFY2026 – 20.6xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.45FY2026 – $1.72FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +36.9%FY2026 – +15.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +24.1% – +33.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.34BFY2026 – $3.86BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.8%FY2026 – +51.4%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +31.0% – +2.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLWPUREESI
Held by institutions 73.0% – 100.0%
Institutions holding 2,684 – 500
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% – +0.7%
Institutions buying 1,477 – 270
Institutions selling 950 – 176
Buyers to sellers 1.55 – 1.53

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLWPUREESI
GLW 1.00 -0.05 0.56
PURE -0.05 1.00 0.00
ESI 0.56 0.00 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLW, PURE and ESI?

Corning (GLW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Corning (GLW) $111.03B, Pure Bioscience (PURE) $10.40M, Element Solutions (ESI) $8.59B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLW, PURE and ESI?

Element Solutions (ESI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Corning (GLW) 51.7x, Pure Bioscience (PURE) -3.8x, Element Solutions (ESI) 42.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Element Solutions (ESI) is cheapest (Corning (GLW) 37.4x, Element Solutions (ESI) 20.6x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Element Solutions (ESI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Corning (GLW) +18.8%, Pure Bioscience (PURE) +5.3%, Element Solutions (ESI) +39.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Corning (GLW) has the highest net margin (Corning (GLW) 12.1%, Pure Bioscience (PURE) -107.1%, Element Solutions (ESI) 5.9%). On return on invested capital, Corning (GLW) leads (Corning (GLW) 11.0%, Element Solutions (ESI) 5.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Corning (GLW) returned the most: Corning (GLW) +42.8%, Pure Bioscience (PURE) 0.0%, Element Solutions (ESI) +33.9%. Over five years, Corning (GLW) compounded fastest (Corning (GLW) +29.4%/yr, Pure Bioscience (PURE) -26.8%/yr, Element Solutions (ESI) +9.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Element Solutions (ESI) has the highest dividend yield: Corning (GLW) 0.87%, Element Solutions (ESI) 0.90%. Pure Bioscience (PURE) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Element Solutions (ESI) has been the steadiest (Corning (GLW) 74.5%, Pure Bioscience (PURE) 160.1%, Element Solutions (ESI) 47.0%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLW, PURE and ESI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Corning (GLW) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.