GLW vs MMM vs Q Stock Comparison

Corning, 3M and Qnity Electronics Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (DD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GLW Corning Inc /Ny
$128.89 -18.8% 1M +42.8% 1Y
Market cap
$105.48B
P/E
49.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$17.72B
Div. yield
0.01%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
5 wins
MMM 3M Co
$177.38 +5.3% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$90.55B
P/E
25.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
6 wins
Q Qnity Electronics, Inc.
$122.68 -2.4% 1M +30.5% 1Y
Market cap
$24.06B
P/E
41.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.21B
Div. yield
0.00%
Specialty Chemicals Basic Materials
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

3M leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (3M 6, Corning 5, Qnity Electronics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLWMMMQLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $105.48B $90.55B $24.06B GLW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 49.1x 25.6x 41.1x MMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 37.4x 20.0x 28.2x MMM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.8% +1.7% +14.8% GLW
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.1% 14.0% 11.2% MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 11.0% 22.0% 8.3% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 1.6x 1.8x GLW
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.01% 0.02% 0.00% MMM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +42.8% +7.7% +30.5% GLW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +29.4%/yr +3.5%/yr — GLW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 74.5% 25.6% 55.3% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 50/100 59/100 Q

Percentile Scorecard

GLWMMMQ

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLWMMMQ
Valuation 23 #73 of 94 36 #130 of 203 37 #60 of 94
Growth 96 #5 of 92 60 #75 of 188 52 #45 of 92
Profitability 85 #14 of 86 89 #22 of 183 88 #11 of 86
Financial Health 60 #38 of 93 19 #176 of 216 65 #33 of 93
Shareholder Returns 33 #48 of 71 46 #82 of 152 56 #32 of 71
Overall 59 50 59
  • GLW ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • Q ranked among 99 companies in Chemicals

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLWMMMQSPY
1 month -18.8%+5.3%-2.4% +0.7%
3 months -4.8%+0.7%-6.0% +3.7%
6 months -21.5%+21.1%-12.8% +7.1%
Year to date +47.2%+10.8%+50.3% +12.8%
1 year +42.8%+7.7%+30.5% +11.9%
3 years +383.5%+137.0%— +85.2%
3 years, per year +69.2%+33.3%— +22.8%
5 years +262.4%+18.7%— +67.6%
5 years, per year +29.4%+3.5%— +10.9%
10 years +468.3%+28.0%— +262.0%
10 years, per year +19.0%+2.5%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGLWMMMQSPY
Volatility, 1Y 74.5%25.6%55.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 75.3%24.7%58.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 3.030.682.66 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.570.300.55 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -51.6%-53.4%-38.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -49.6%-3.5%-30.2% -1.2%
52-week high $255.69$183.81$175.64 $779.14
52-week low $78.03$141.20$73.54 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLWMMMQ
P/E now vs peer median 51.7xmedian 21.0x 26.0xmedian 25.8x 43.9xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 1.4x 3.6xmedian 1.9x 4.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 26.5xmedian 12.9x 16.5xmedian 14.6x 16.7xmedian 12.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 45.1xmedian 15.5x 34.2xmedian 22.2x 31.1xmedian 15.5x
P/B now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 1.7x 22.0xmedian 2.2x 3.4xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 0.97median 1.68 0.73median 1.45 —median 1.68

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLWMMMQ
Revenue $17.72B $25.25B $5.21B
Gross profit $6.46B $9.98B $2.41B
Operating income $2.92B $4.74B $1.34B
Net income $2.35B $3.58B $630.00M
Free cash flow $2.46B $2.68B $825.00M
R&D $1.18B $1.21B $374.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.47 $6.77 $2.79
Cash & equivalents $2.54B $4.84B $961.00M
Total debt $8.23B $15.00B $4.02B
Shares (diluted) 871.00M 522.60M 210.20M
Enterprise value $97.15B $71.99B $21.20B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLWMMMQ
P/E 51.7x 26.0x 43.9x
P/FCF 45.1x 34.2x 31.1x
P/Operating cash flow 26.5x 25.3x 22.0x
P/S 6.3x 3.6x 4.9x
P/B 7.8x 22.0x 3.4x
P/Tangible book 8.1x 43.3x 3.9x
EV/EBITDA 26.5x 16.5x 16.7x
EV/EBIT 40.0x 21.4x 21.5x
EV/Revenue 6.6x 4.0x 5.5x
EV/FCF 47.4x 37.9x 34.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 27.8x 28.0x 24.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.97 0.73 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLWMMMQ
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.8% 1.7% 14.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 10.9% 10.7% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 21.4% -1.8% 13.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 18.0% 17.0% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 46.0% -3.7% 11.6%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 48.2% 33.4% –
Net income growth (1Y) 57.2% 4.8% -23.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 53.6% 35.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 56.9% 7.1% -26.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 53.6% 35.8% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 85.0% 42.8% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 30.0% -18.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 111.8% 68.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.0% -18.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLWMMMQ
Gross margin 36.5% 39.5% 46.2%
EBITDA margin 24.9% 24.4% 33.0%
Operating margin 16.5% 18.8% 25.6%
Pretax margin 15.9% 17.5% 16.9%
Net margin 12.1% 14.0% 11.2%
FCF margin 13.9% 10.6% 15.8%
Operating cash flow margin 23.7% 14.4% 22.4%
Return on equity 17.1% 101.3% 8.4%
Return on assets 7.0% 9.8% 4.4%
Return on invested capital 11.0% 22.0% 8.3%
Return on capital employed 10.8% 18.7% 10.5%
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.7x 0.4x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 1.0x 1.9x
Stock comp / revenue 2.1% 0.8% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLWMMMQ
Debt / assets 24.1% 37.9% 28.1%
Debt / equity 0.6x 3.6x 0.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 1.3x 1.6x 1.8x
Debt / FCF 3.3x 5.6x 4.9x
Liabilities / assets 58.1% 89.5% 47.3%
Equity / assets 41.9% 10.5% 52.7%
Interest coverage 8.0x – 7.1x
Current ratio 1.7x 1.4x 2.0x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.8x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.7x
Altman Z-score 5.04 4.14 3.09

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLWMMMQ
Dividend yield 0.9% 1.7% 0.2%
Net buyback yield -0.5% 3.0% 0.2%
Shareholder yield 0.4% 4.7% 0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 43.1% 44.8% 5.4%
Payout ratio (FCF) 41.1% 59.9% 4.1%
Dividend growth (1Y) 1.9% 3.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 1.2% -21.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLWMMMQ
Forward P/E 37.4xFY2026 20.0xFY2026 28.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.45FY2026 $8.88FY2026 $4.35FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +36.9%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 +29.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +24.1% +16.7% +21.8%
Revenue, next fiscal year $18.34BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026 $5.34BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.8%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026 +12.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +31.0% +17.6% +23.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLWMMMQ
Held by institutions 73.0% 74.5% 77.2%
Institutions holding 2,684 2,211 1,326
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.5% +0.8% +4.4%
Institutions buying 1,477 916 659
Institutions selling 950 838 439
Buyers to sellers 1.55 1.09 1.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLWMMMQ
GLW 1.00 0.17 0.61
MMM 0.17 1.00 0.16
Q 0.61 0.16 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLW, MMM and Q?

Corning (GLW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Corning (GLW) $105.48B, 3M (MMM) $90.55B, Qnity Electronics (Q) $24.06B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLW, MMM and Q?

3M (MMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Corning (GLW) 49.1x, 3M (MMM) 25.6x, Qnity Electronics (Q) 41.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, 3M (MMM) is cheapest (Corning (GLW) 37.4x, 3M (MMM) 20.0x, Qnity Electronics (Q) 28.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Corning (GLW) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Corning (GLW) +18.8%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Qnity Electronics (Q) +14.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (Corning (GLW) 12.1%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%, Qnity Electronics (Q) 11.2%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (Corning (GLW) 11.0%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%, Qnity Electronics (Q) 8.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Corning (GLW) returned the most: Corning (GLW) +42.8%, 3M (MMM) +7.7%, Qnity Electronics (Q) +30.5%. Over five years, Corning (GLW) compounded fastest (Corning (GLW) +29.4%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

3M (MMM) has the highest dividend yield: Corning (GLW) 0.01%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Qnity Electronics (Q) 0.00%.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (Corning (GLW) 74.5%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%, Qnity Electronics (Q) 55.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLW, MMM and Q?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.