GLOO vs MTLS vs PATH Stock Comparison

Gloo Holdings, Materialise and UiPath Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (APPN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GLOO Gloo Holdings, Inc.
$2.92 -38.8% 1M
Market cap
$236.89M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$154.29M
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
1 win
MTLS Materialise Nv
$8.65 +2.6% 1M +43.2% 1Y
Market cap
$511.52M
P/E
33.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$318.18M
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
5 wins
PATH UiPath, Inc.
$14.28 +14.5% 1M -13.3% 1Y
Market cap
$7.29B
P/E
20.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.72B
Div. yield
–
Business Process Automation Technology
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

UiPath leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (UiPath 5, Materialise 5, Gloo Holdings 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLOOMTLSPATHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $236.89M $511.52M $7.29B PATH
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -1.9x 33.2x 20.2x PATH
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 43.2x 18.8x PATH
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +275.5% +10.2% +15.0% GLOO
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -81.3% 4.8% 21.0% PATH
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -54.6% 3.5% — MTLS
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -2.5x — MTLS
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months — +43.2% -13.3% MTLS
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — -17.1%/yr -22.5%/yr MTLS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 89.4% 42.1% 64.5% MTLS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 36/100 65/100 77/100 PATH

Percentile Scorecard

GLOOMTLSPATH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLOOMTLSPATH
Valuation 19 #83 of 102 86 #15 of 102 78 #23 of 102
Growth 85 #16 of 98 88 #13 of 98 87 #14 of 98
Profitability 14 #82 of 95 61 #38 of 95 76 #24 of 95
Financial Health 58 #46 of 109 81 #22 of 109 89 #13 of 109
Shareholder Returns 5 #61 of 64 8 #59 of 64 54 #30 of 64
Overall 36 65 77
  • GLOO ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • MTLS ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications
  • PATH ranked among 115 companies in Business Applications

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLOOMTLSPATHSPY
1 month -38.8%+2.6%+14.5% -0.8%
3 months -10.2%+34.3%+23.0% +3.5%
6 months -56.0%+62.9%+36.5% +7.0%
Year to date -48.7%+55.9%-12.9% +12.2%
1 year —+43.2%-13.3% +13.0%
3 years —+62.3%-4.4% +86.3%
3 years, per year —+17.5%-1.5% +23.1%
5 years —-60.9%-72.1% +68.6%
5 years, per year —-17.1%-22.5% +11.0%
10 years —+13.8%— +258.0%
10 years, per year —+1.3%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGLOOMTLSPATHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 89.4%42.1%64.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 84.1%38.3%66.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.871.101.05 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y —1.03-0.21 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -69.3%-84.7%-83.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -69.3%-1.1%-26.0% -1.8%
52-week high $9.50$8.75$19.29 $779.14
52-week low $2.92$4.80$9.38 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLOOMTLSPATH
P/E now vs peer median -1.9xmedian 28.8x 33.2xmedian 28.8x 20.5xmedian 28.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 2.8x 1.6xmedian 2.8x 3.8xmedian 2.8x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -2.8xmedian 17.7x 10.5xmedian 17.7x 17.7xmedian 17.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -3.6xmedian 15.8x 31.6xmedian 15.8x 18.0xmedian 15.8x
P/B now vs peer median 1.5xmedian 3.2x 1.7xmedian 3.2x 3.3xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.85 0.11median 0.85 0.33median 0.85

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLOOMTLSPATH
Revenue $154.29M $318.18M $1.72B
Gross profit $45.81M $182.10M $1.42B
Operating income -$100.96M $12.25M $152.95M
Net income -$125.92M $15.39M $361.92M
Free cash flow -$66.32M $16.15M $362.96M
R&D $24.02M $55.71M $368.32M
EPS (diluted) $-1.54 $0.26 $0.69
Cash & equivalents $39.30M $152.75M $607.41M
Total debt $37.42M $53.39M –
Shares (diluted) 81.41M 59.07M 523.01M
Enterprise value $92.15M -$105.79M $1.83B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLOOMTLSPATH
P/E -1.9x 33.2x 20.5x
P/FCF -3.6x 31.6x 18.0x
P/Operating cash flow -3.7x 14.3x 17.5x
P/S 1.5x 1.6x 3.8x
P/B 1.5x 1.7x 3.3x
P/Tangible book 2.0x 1.9x 3.5x
EV/EBITDA -2.8x 10.5x 17.7x
EV/EBIT -2.3x 33.6x 34.2x
EV/Revenue 1.5x 1.3x 3.0x
EV/FCF -3.6x 25.5x 14.4x
EV/Operating cash flow -3.7x 11.5x 14.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.11 0.33

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLOOMTLSPATH
Revenue growth (1Y) 275.5% 10.2% 15.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 6.4% 14.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 368.8% 11.4% 14.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 7.0% 13.8%
Operating income growth (1Y) 1.8% 73.2% 430.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 62.7% 38.3%
Net income growth (1Y) 2.7% 150.8% 1,695%
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 330.9% 59.2%
EPS growth (1Y) 91.1% 151.3% 1,763%
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 310.4% 61.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 46.9% 11.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 32.9% 27.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 340.6% 17.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 53.8% 29.3%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLOOMTLSPATH
Gross margin 29.7% 57.2% 82.6%
EBITDA margin -55.4% 12.3% 17.2%
Operating margin -65.4% 3.9% 8.9%
Pretax margin -83.9% 4.9% 12.3%
Net margin -81.3% 4.8% 21.0%
FCF margin -43.0% 5.1% 21.1%
Operating cash flow margin -41.7% 11.3% 21.7%
Return on equity -84.9% 5.3% 18.8%
Return on assets -49.4% 3.2% 12.5%
Return on invested capital -54.6% 3.5% –
Return on capital employed -50.5% 3.3% 7.3%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.5x 2.3x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 12.3% 0.1% 13.6%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLOOMTLSPATH
Debt / assets 13.8% 11.2% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.0x -2.5x –
Debt / FCF -0.6x 3.3x –
Liabilities / assets 42.5% 38.6% 33.0%
Equity / assets 57.5% 61.4% 67.0%
Interest coverage -9.9x 27.6x –
Current ratio 1.2x 2.4x 2.4x
Quick ratio 1.1x 2.1x 2.1x
Cash ratio 0.7x 1.5x 1.6x
Altman Z-score 0.23 2.97 4.51

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLOOMTLSPATH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -37.7% -20.9% 3.9%
Shareholder yield -37.7% -20.9% 3.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLOOMTLSPATH
Forward P/E – 43.2xFY2026 18.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $-0.60FY2026 $0.20FY2026 $0.76FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +33.3%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +45.0% +14.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $188.99MFY2026 $302.24MFY2026 $1.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +99.7%FY2026 -3.8%FY2026 +16.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +56.5% +17.6% -3.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLOOMTLSPATH
Held by institutions – 13.7% 79.0%
Institutions holding – 59 525
Change in shares held, QoQ – +9.4% +14.3%
Institutions buying – 23 276
Institutions selling – 22 169
Buyers to sellers – 1.05 1.63

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLOOMTLSPATH
GLOO 1.00 0.12 0.05
MTLS 0.12 1.00 0.19
PATH 0.05 0.19 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLOO, MTLS and PATH?

UiPath (PATH) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gloo Holdings (GLOO) $236.89M, Materialise (MTLS) $511.52M, UiPath (PATH) $7.29B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLOO, MTLS and PATH?

UiPath (PATH) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Gloo Holdings (GLOO) -1.9x, Materialise (MTLS) 33.2x, UiPath (PATH) 20.2x). On next year's consensus earnings, UiPath (PATH) is cheapest (Materialise (MTLS) 43.2x, UiPath (PATH) 18.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Gloo Holdings (GLOO) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gloo Holdings (GLOO) +275.5%, Materialise (MTLS) +10.2%, UiPath (PATH) +15.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

UiPath (PATH) has the highest net margin (Gloo Holdings (GLOO) -81.3%, Materialise (MTLS) 4.8%, UiPath (PATH) 21.0%). On return on invested capital, Materialise (MTLS) leads (Gloo Holdings (GLOO) -54.6%, Materialise (MTLS) 3.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Materialise (MTLS) returned the most: Materialise (MTLS) +43.2%, UiPath (PATH) -13.3%. Over five years, Materialise (MTLS) compounded fastest (Materialise (MTLS) -17.1%/yr, UiPath (PATH) -22.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Materialise (MTLS) has been the steadiest (Gloo Holdings (GLOO) 89.4%, Materialise (MTLS) 42.1%, UiPath (PATH) 64.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLOO, MTLS and PATH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, UiPath (PATH) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.