GLNG vs WMB vs VG Stock Comparison

Golar Lng, Williams Companies and Venture Global Prices as of Oct 26, 2026 Peers: Industry group
GLNG Golar Lng Ltd
$45.21 -8.9% 1M +18.6% 1Y
Market cap
$4.71B
P/E
28.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$523.38M
Div. yield
–
LNG and Gas Processing Energy
5 wins
WMB Williams Companies, Inc.
$71.78 +3.6% 1M +24.9% 1Y
Market cap
$90.68B
P/E
26.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$12.20B
Div. yield
–
Oil and Gas Pipelines Energy
3 wins
VG Venture Global, Inc.
$13.75 +9.0% 1M +44.9% 1Y
Market cap
$34.39B
P/E
10.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$16.95B
Div. yield
–
LNG and Gas Processing Energy
3 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Golar Lng leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Golar Lng 5, Williams Companies 3, Venture Global 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLNGWMBVGLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $4.71B $90.68B $34.39B WMB
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.8x 26.8x 10.3x VG
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 40.7x 27.9x 7.4x VG
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +109.6% +8.7% +100.7% GLNG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 31.3% 27.7% 19.7% GLNG
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 22.6% — 10.4% GLNG
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 5.3x 0.9x 5.3x WMB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +18.6% +24.9% +44.9% VG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +28.2%/yr +20.5%/yr — GLNG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.2% 24.9% 74.6% WMB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 62/100 39/100 55/100 GLNG

Percentile Scorecard

GLNGWMBVG

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLNGWMBVG
Valuation 29 #25 of 35 3 #34 of 35 74 #10 of 35
Growth 91 #4 of 34 42 #20 of 34 97 #2 of 34
Profitability 85 #6 of 34 76 #9 of 34 61 #14 of 34
Financial Health 79 #8 of 35 56 #16 of 35 38 #22 of 35
Shareholder Returns 27 #23 of 31 20 #25 of 31 3 #30 of 31
Overall 62 39 55
  • GLNG ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • WMB ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream
  • VG ranked among 35 companies in Oil and Gas Midstream

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLNGWMBVGSPY
1 month -8.9%+3.6%+9.0% -0.8%
3 months -7.7%+1.4%+7.3% +3.5%
6 months -14.4%+0.2%+12.8% +7.0%
Year to date +21.5%+19.4%+101.6% +12.2%
1 year +18.6%+24.9%+44.9% +13.0%
3 years +101.5%+110.8%— +86.3%
3 years, per year +26.3%+28.2%— +23.1%
5 years +245.6%+153.6%— +68.6%
5 years, per year +28.2%+20.5%— +11.0%
10 years +95.4%+142.8%— +258.0%
10 years, per year +6.9%+9.3%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureGLNGWMBVGSPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.2%24.9%74.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 27.3%24.8%71.1% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.130.03-1.36 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.681.000.60 1.02
Max drawdown, 5Y -34.1%-25.2%-75.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -21.2%-9.6%-21.6% -1.8%
52-week high $57.36$79.40$17.53 $779.14
52-week low $35.33$56.51$5.92 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLNGWMBVG
P/E now vs peer median 28.5xmedian 21.0x 26.0xmedian 21.0x 10.3xmedian 21.0x
P/S now vs peer median 8.8xmedian 2.7x 7.2xmedian 2.7x 2.0xmedian 2.7x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 18.9xmedian 11.0x 13.5xmedian 11.0x 9.9xmedian 11.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 7.8xmedian 16.6x -813.0xmedian 16.6x -4.9xmedian 16.6x
P/B now vs peer median 2.4xmedian 2.6x 6.7xmedian 2.6x 2.8xmedian 2.6x
PEG now vs peer median 1.88median 1.92 3.15median 1.92 —median 1.92

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLNGWMBVG
Revenue $523.38M $12.20B $16.95B
Gross profit $343.33M $10.12B $9.07B
Operating income $273.22M $4.66B $6.38B
Net income $226.50M $3.24B $3.78B
Free cash flow $583.87M -$108.00M -$6.99B
R&D $14.62M – $174.00M
EPS (diluted) $1.49 $2.76 $1.26
Cash & equivalents $870.50M $203.00M $3.12B
Total debt $2.68B $6.64B $41.81B
Shares (diluted) 109.49M 1.23B 2.64B
Enterprise value $1.07B $89.39B $25.43B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLNGWMBVG
P/E 28.5x 26.0x 10.3x
P/FCF 7.8x -813.0x -4.9x
P/Operating cash flow 10.8x 14.6x 5.0x
P/S 8.8x 7.2x 2.0x
P/B 2.4x 6.7x 2.8x
P/Tangible book 2.4x 6.7x 2.8x
EV/EBITDA 18.9x 13.5x 9.9x
EV/EBIT 23.4x 20.2x 11.4x
EV/Revenue 12.2x 7.7x 4.3x
EV/FCF 10.9x -872.5x -10.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 15.1x 15.7x 10.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.88 3.15 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLNGWMBVG
Revenue growth (1Y) 109.6% 8.7% 100.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 23.3% 2.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 147.7% 12.4% 71.7%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 19.9% 5.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 1,754% 27.0% 119.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 104.0% 4.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) 894.0% 26.2% 124.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 18.5% 5.4% –
EPS growth (1Y) 2,539% 39.2% 157.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 8.2% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 1.1% 12.2% 93.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 11.3% 2.3% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -5.5% -105.7% 32.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 60.4% -26.8% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLNGWMBVG
Gross margin 65.6% 82.9% 53.5%
EBITDA margin 64.6% 57.3% 43.3%
Operating margin 52.2% 38.2% 37.6%
Pretax margin 62.0% 34.7% 27.1%
Net margin 31.3% 27.7% 19.7%
FCF margin 111.6% -0.9% -41.2%
Operating cash flow margin 80.8% 49.1% 40.3%
Return on equity 1,387% 24.7% 33.2%
Return on assets 4.2% 5.8% 6.4%
Return on invested capital 22.6% – 10.4%
Return on capital employed 5.6% 8.7% 11.6%
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 1.8x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 1.9% – 0.3%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLNGWMBVG
Debt / assets 50.1% 11.0% 68.0%
Debt / equity 1.4x 0.5x 3.5x
Net debt / EBITDA 5.3x 0.9x 5.3x
Debt / FCF 4.6x -61.5x -6.0x
Liabilities / assets 63.6% 78.2% 80.4%
Equity / assets 36.4% 21.8% 19.6%
Interest coverage 16.5x 3.1x 3.5x
Current ratio 2.3x 0.5x 1.2x
Quick ratio 2.2x 0.3x 1.0x
Cash ratio 1.8x 0.0x 0.8x
Altman Z-score – 1.22 1.19

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLNGWMBVG
Dividend yield 2.2% 2.9% 0.7%
Net buyback yield 0.7% – –
Shareholder yield 3.0% 2.9% 0.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLNGWMBVG
Forward P/E 40.7xFY2026 27.9xFY2026 7.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.11FY2026 $2.57FY2026 $1.85FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -27.5%FY2026 +22.4%FY2026 +115.1%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -53.2% -2.7% -31.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $409.44MFY2026 $12.71BFY2026 $17.86BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +4.0%FY2026 +6.4%FY2026 +29.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -2.6% +9.7% -6.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLNGWMBVG
Held by institutions 81.4% 89.4% 86.8%
Institutions holding 311 1,832 369
Change in shares held, QoQ -0.4% +4.2% +1.4%
Institutions buying 153 886 263
Institutions selling 105 657 76
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.35 3.46

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLNGWMBVG
GLNG 1.00 0.32 0.35
WMB 0.32 1.00 0.32
VG 0.35 0.32 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLNG, WMB and VG?

Williams Companies (WMB) is the largest by market capitalisation: Golar Lng (GLNG) $4.71B, Williams Companies (WMB) $90.68B, Venture Global (VG) $34.39B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLNG, WMB and VG?

Venture Global (VG) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Golar Lng (GLNG) 28.8x, Williams Companies (WMB) 26.8x, Venture Global (VG) 10.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, Venture Global (VG) is cheapest (Golar Lng (GLNG) 40.7x, Williams Companies (WMB) 27.9x, Venture Global (VG) 7.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Golar Lng (GLNG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Golar Lng (GLNG) +109.6%, Williams Companies (WMB) +8.7%, Venture Global (VG) +100.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Golar Lng (GLNG) has the highest net margin (Golar Lng (GLNG) 31.3%, Williams Companies (WMB) 27.7%, Venture Global (VG) 19.7%). On return on invested capital, Golar Lng (GLNG) leads (Golar Lng (GLNG) 22.6%, Venture Global (VG) 10.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Venture Global (VG) returned the most: Golar Lng (GLNG) +18.6%, Williams Companies (WMB) +24.9%, Venture Global (VG) +44.9%. Over five years, Golar Lng (GLNG) compounded fastest (Golar Lng (GLNG) +28.2%/yr, Williams Companies (WMB) +20.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Williams Companies (WMB) has been the steadiest (Golar Lng (GLNG) 27.2%, Williams Companies (WMB) 24.9%, Venture Global (VG) 74.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLNG, WMB and VG?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Golar Lng (GLNG) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.