GLGI vs MTD vs MMM Stock Comparison

Greystone Logistics, Mettler Toledo International and 3M Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ITW) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MMM 3M Co
$172.82 +2.0% 1M +3.6% 1Y
Market cap
$91.15B
P/E
25.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

3M leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (3M 5, Mettler Toledo International 5, Greystone Logistics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLGIMTDMMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.18M $34.46B $91.15B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.5x 38.0x 25.8x MMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 33.8x 19.5x MMM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -59.9% +6.9% +1.7% MTD
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -43.8% 21.9% 14.0% MTD
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -37.9% 47.1% 22.0% MTD
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -4.6x 1.5x 1.6x GLGI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -79.1% +21.0% +3.6% MTD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -26.7%/yr +2.8%/yr +3.0%/yr MMM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 116.7% 33.0% 25.6% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 10/100 51/100 50/100 MTD

Percentile Scorecard

GLGIMTDMMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLGIMTDMMM
Valuation 28 #146 of 203 13 #177 of 203 38 #126 of 203
Growth 0 #188 of 188 37 #118 of 188 59 #77 of 188
Profitability 6 #173 of 184 100 #1 of 184 87 #24 of 184
Financial Health 7 #203 of 217 24 #165 of 217 19 #177 of 217
Shareholder Returns – 82 #28 of 153 47 #82 of 153
Overall 10 51 50
  • GLGI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MTD ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLGIMTDMMMSPY
1 month -26.9%+10.0%+2.0% +0.9%
3 months -17.4%+22.3%-2.9% +5.9%
6 months -5.0%+37.0%+20.1% +8.5%
Year to date -67.2%+21.9%+7.9% +13.3%
1 year -79.1%+21.0%+3.6% +12.4%
3 years -80.2%+74.0%+136.2% +88.1%
3 years, per year -41.7%+20.3%+33.2% +23.5%
5 years -78.9%+14.7%+15.7% +68.2%
5 years, per year -26.7%+2.8%+3.0% +11.0%
10 years -24.0%+324.1%+24.7% +263.4%
10 years, per year -2.7%+15.5%+2.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureGLGIMTDMMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 116.7%33.0%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 150.9%34.0%24.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.110.820.69 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.680.640.14 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.7%-43.5%-53.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -79.1%0.0%-6.0% -0.9%
52-week high $0.91$1,699.16$183.81 $779.14
52-week low $0.15$1,025.53$141.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLGIMTDMMM
P/E now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 25.4x 37.8xmedian 25.4x 25.4xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.9x 8.9xmedian 1.9x 3.5xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -6.7xmedian 14.3x 28.6xmedian 14.3x 16.1xmedian 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.0xmedian 21.8x 42.6xmedian 21.8x 33.4xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 0.6xmedian 2.2x 2,873xmedian 2.2x 21.4xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 1.41 5.46median 1.41 0.71median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLGIMTDMMM
Revenue $22.12M $4.13B $25.25B
Gross profit -$2.92M $2.49B $9.98B
Operating income -$8.43M $1.23B $4.74B
Net income -$9.70M $905.61M $3.58B
Free cash flow -$5.06M $863.97M $2.68B
R&D – $208.01M $1.21B
EPS (diluted) $-0.36 $44.91 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $360.53K $51.40M $4.84B
Total debt $46.58M $2.11B $15.00B
Shares (diluted) 27.27M 20.17M 522.60M
Enterprise value $3.17M $34.21B $72.60B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLGIMTDMMM
P/E -0.5x 37.8x 25.4x
P/FCF -1.0x 42.6x 33.4x
P/Operating cash flow -1.6x 37.8x 24.6x
P/S 0.2x 8.9x 3.5x
P/B 0.6x 2,873x 21.4x
P/Tangible book 0.6x -145.4x 42.2x
EV/EBITDA -6.7x 28.6x 16.1x
EV/EBIT -2.0x 31.6x 20.9x
EV/Revenue 0.8x 9.4x 3.9x
EV/FCF -3.3x 45.0x 37.0x
EV/Operating cash flow -5.1x 39.9x 27.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 5.46 0.71

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLGIMTDMMM
Revenue growth (1Y) -59.9% 6.9% 1.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -28.0% 1.5% 10.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -133.7% 7.5% -1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -31.4% 2.0% 17.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) -472.2% 6.3% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -51.5% 0.2% 33.4%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,158% 9.1% 4.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -50.9% 3.7% 35.4%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,653% 12.2% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -56.5% 6.9% 35.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -132.8% 2.5% 42.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -31.4% 0.2% -18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -169.9% 1.9% 68.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -49.9% 0.2% -18.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLGIMTDMMM
Gross margin -13.2% 60.3% 39.5%
EBITDA margin -11.3% 32.9% 24.4%
Operating margin -38.1% 29.7% 18.8%
Pretax margin -42.4% 26.5% 17.5%
Net margin -43.8% 21.9% 14.0%
FCF margin -22.9% 20.9% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin -15.0% 23.6% 14.4%
Return on equity -94.7% – 101.3%
Return on assets -26.5% 24.7% 9.8%
Return on invested capital -37.9% 47.1% 22.0%
Return on capital employed -39.6% 49.8% 18.7%
Asset turnover 0.6x 1.1x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 1.1x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.6% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLGIMTDMMM
Debt / assets 33.5% 57.5% 37.9%
Debt / equity 1.3x 164.7x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA -4.6x 1.5x 1.6x
Debt / FCF -2.4x 2.4x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 75.0% 99.7% 89.5%
Equity / assets 25.0% 0.3% 10.5%
Interest coverage – 17.7x –
Current ratio 0.4x 1.1x 1.4x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.0x 0.4x
Altman Z-score -1.84 12.00 4.10

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLGIMTDMMM
Dividend yield – – 1.8%
Net buyback yield – 2.0% 3.1%
Shareholder yield – 2.0% 4.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 44.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 59.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -21.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLGIMTDMMM
Forward P/E – 33.8xFY2026 19.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $50.31FY2026 $8.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +17.7%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +5.0% +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $4.52BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +12.2%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +3.8% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLGIMTDMMM
Held by institutions – 94.4% 74.5%
Institutions holding – 804 2,210
Change in shares held, QoQ – +3.1% +0.8%
Institutions buying – 331 916
Institutions selling – 324 837
Buyers to sellers – 1.02 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLGIMTDMMM
GLGI 1.00 0.06 0.01
MTD 0.06 1.00 0.34
MMM 0.01 0.34 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLGI, MTD and MMM?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) $5.18M, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) $34.46B, 3M (MMM) $91.15B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLGI, MTD and MMM?

3M (MMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -0.5x, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 38.0x, 3M (MMM) 25.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, 3M (MMM) is cheapest (Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 33.8x, 3M (MMM) 19.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Mettler Toledo International (MTD) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -59.9%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) +6.9%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Mettler Toledo International (MTD) has the highest net margin (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -43.8%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 21.9%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%). On return on invested capital, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) leads (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -37.9%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 47.1%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Mettler Toledo International (MTD) returned the most: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -79.1%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) +21.0%, 3M (MMM) +3.6%. Over five years, 3M (MMM) compounded fastest (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -26.7%/yr, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) +2.8%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 0.00%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%. Greystone Logistics (GLGI) and Mettler Toledo International (MTD) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) 116.7%, Mettler Toledo International (MTD) 33.0%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLGI, MTD and MMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.