GLGI vs MMM vs WM Stock Comparison

Greystone Logistics, 3M and Waste Management Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AME) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
MMM 3M Co
$177.38 +5.3% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$90.04B
P/E
25.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins
WM Waste Management Inc
$230.86 +11.5% 1M +16.9% 1Y
Market cap
$92.98B
P/E
30.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$26.07B
Div. yield
0.02%
Solid Waste Industrials
6 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Waste Management leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Waste Management 6, 3M 5, Greystone Logistics 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLGIMMMWMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $5.18M $90.04B $92.98B WM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -0.5x 25.5x 30.3x MMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 20.0x 26.7x MMM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months -59.9% +1.7% +5.2% WM
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -43.8% 14.0% 11.8% MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital -37.9% 22.0% 11.4% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -4.6x 1.6x 3.0x GLGI
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% MMM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -79.3% +7.7% +16.9% WM
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -27.5%/yr +3.5%/yr +7.6%/yr WM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 116.8% 25.6% 21.3% WM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 11/100 50/100 54/100 WM

Percentile Scorecard

GLGIMMMWM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLGIMMMWM
Valuation 30 #142 of 203 36 #130 of 203 47 #9 of 16
Growth 0 #188 of 188 60 #75 of 188 62 #6 of 14
Profitability 6 #172 of 183 89 #22 of 183 100 #1 of 14
Financial Health 7 #202 of 216 19 #176 of 216 7 #14 of 15
Shareholder Returns – 46 #82 of 152 –
Overall 11 50 54
  • GLGI ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • WM ranked among 16 companies in Waste Management

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLGIMMMWMSPY
1 month -30.8%+5.3%+11.5% +0.7%
3 months -14.3%+0.7%+2.0% +3.7%
6 months -33.3%+21.1%-0.7% +7.1%
Year to date -69.0%+10.8%+5.1% +12.8%
1 year -79.3%+7.7%+16.9% +11.9%
3 years -82.9%+137.0%+41.8% +85.2%
3 years, per year -44.5%+33.3%+12.4% +22.8%
5 years -80.0%+18.7%+44.1% +67.6%
5 years, per year -27.5%+3.5%+7.6% +10.9%
10 years -28.0%+28.0%+260.8% +262.0%
10 years, per year -3.2%+2.5%+13.7% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGLGIMMMWMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 116.8%25.6%21.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 151.0%24.7%20.3% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y -1.100.68-0.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.680.300.79 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -90.7%-53.4%-18.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -80.0%-3.5%-6.3% -1.2%
52-week high $0.90$183.81$246.51 $779.14
52-week low $0.15$141.20$196.77 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLGIMMMWM
P/E now vs peer median -0.5xmedian 25.8x 26.0xmedian 25.8x 30.0xmedian 30.9x
P/S now vs peer median 0.2xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x 3.5xmedian 3.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -6.6xmedian 14.6x 16.5xmedian 14.6x 14.8xmedian 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median -1.0xmedian 22.2x 34.2xmedian 22.2x 24.5xmedian 17.3x
P/B now vs peer median 0.5xmedian 2.2x 22.0xmedian 2.2x 9.3xmedian 2.8x
PEG now vs peer median 0.01median 1.45 0.73median 1.45 2.86median 2.44

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLGIMMMWM
Revenue $22.12M $25.25B $26.07B
Gross profit -$2.92M $9.98B $10.53B
Operating income -$8.43M $4.74B $4.80B
Net income -$9.70M $3.58B $3.07B
Free cash flow -$5.06M $2.68B $3.74B
R&D – $1.21B –
EPS (diluted) $-0.36 $6.77 $7.68
Cash & equivalents $360.53K $4.84B $247.00M
Total debt $46.58M $15.00B $23.37B
Shares (diluted) 27.27M 522.60M 399.80M
Enterprise value $3.17M $71.48B $91.82B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLGIMMMWM
P/E -0.5x 26.0x 30.0x
P/FCF -1.0x 34.2x 24.5x
P/Operating cash flow -1.5x 25.3x 14.0x
P/S 0.2x 3.6x 3.5x
P/B 0.5x 22.0x 9.3x
P/Tangible book 0.5x 43.3x 14.5x
EV/EBITDA -6.6x 16.5x 14.8x
EV/EBIT -2.0x 21.4x 23.9x
EV/Revenue 0.7x 4.0x 4.4x
EV/FCF -3.3x 37.9x 30.7x
EV/Operating cash flow -5.0x 28.0x 17.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.01 0.73 2.86

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLGIMMMWM
Revenue growth (1Y) -59.9% 1.7% 5.2%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -28.0% 10.7% 9.0%
Gross profit growth (1Y) -133.7% -1.8% -21.0%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -31.4% 17.0% 11.5%
Operating income growth (1Y) -472.2% -3.7% 17.9%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -51.5% 33.4% 10.5%
Net income growth (1Y) -1,158% 4.8% 19.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -50.9% 35.4% 10.0%
EPS growth (1Y) -1,653% 7.1% 21.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -56.5% 35.8% 10.5%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -132.8% 42.8% 12.1%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -31.4% -18.1% 14.4%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -169.9% 68.6% 55.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -49.9% -18.0% 30.8%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLGIMMMWM
Gross margin -13.2% 39.5% 40.4%
EBITDA margin -11.3% 24.4% 29.8%
Operating margin -38.1% 18.8% 18.4%
Pretax margin -42.4% 17.5% 14.9%
Net margin -43.8% 14.0% 11.8%
FCF margin -22.9% 10.6% 14.3%
Operating cash flow margin -15.0% 14.4% 25.2%
Return on equity -94.7% 101.3% 31.0%
Return on assets -26.5% 9.8% 6.6%
Return on invested capital -37.9% 22.0% 11.4%
Return on capital employed -39.6% 18.7% 12.0%
Asset turnover 0.6x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 0.3x 1.0x 2.1x
Stock comp / revenue – 0.8% 0.7%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLGIMMMWM
Debt / assets 33.5% 37.9% 50.2%
Debt / equity 1.3x 3.6x 2.4x
Net debt / EBITDA -4.6x 1.6x 3.0x
Debt / FCF -2.4x 5.6x 6.2x
Liabilities / assets 75.0% 89.5% 78.8%
Equity / assets 25.0% 10.5% 21.2%
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 0.4x 1.4x 0.8x
Quick ratio 0.2x 0.8x 0.7x
Cash ratio 0.0x 0.4x 0.0x
Altman Z-score -1.85 4.14 2.93

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLGIMMMWM
Dividend yield – 1.7% 1.6%
Net buyback yield – 3.0% 1.7%
Shareholder yield – 4.7% 3.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 44.8% 48.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 59.9% 39.4%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.2% 13.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -21.4% 9.6%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLGIMMMWM
Forward P/E – 20.0xFY2026 26.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $8.88FY2026 $8.65FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +10.2%FY2026 +15.3%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +16.7% +9.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $23.87BFY2026 $25.84BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – -1.8%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +17.6% +12.0%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLGIMMMWM
Held by institutions – 74.5% 82.3%
Institutions holding – 2,211 2,350
Change in shares held, QoQ – +0.8% +0.8%
Institutions buying – 916 1,096
Institutions selling – 838 901
Buyers to sellers – 1.09 1.22

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLGIMMMWM
GLGI 1.00 0.01 0.12
MMM 0.01 1.00 -0.02
WM 0.12 -0.02 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLGI, MMM and WM?

Waste Management (WM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) $5.18M, 3M (MMM) $90.04B, Waste Management (WM) $92.98B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLGI, MMM and WM?

3M (MMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -0.5x, 3M (MMM) 25.5x, Waste Management (WM) 30.3x). On next year's consensus earnings, 3M (MMM) is cheapest (3M (MMM) 20.0x, Waste Management (WM) 26.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Waste Management (WM) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -59.9%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Waste Management (WM) +5.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -43.8%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%, Waste Management (WM) 11.8%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -37.9%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%, Waste Management (WM) 11.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Waste Management (WM) returned the most: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -79.3%, 3M (MMM) +7.7%, Waste Management (WM) +16.9%. Over five years, Waste Management (WM) compounded fastest (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) -27.5%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.5%/yr, Waste Management (WM) +7.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

3M (MMM) has the highest dividend yield: Greystone Logistics (GLGI) 0.00%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Waste Management (WM) 0.02%. Greystone Logistics (GLGI) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Waste Management (WM) has been the steadiest (Greystone Logistics (GLGI) 116.8%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%, Waste Management (WM) 21.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLGI, MMM and WM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Waste Management (WM) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.