GLBE vs MELI vs DASH Stock Comparison

Global-E Online, Mercadolibre and DoorDash Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PAYD) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GLBE Global-E Online Ltd.
$41.36 +0.3% 1M +20.1% 1Y
Market cap
$7.10B
P/E
46.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.11B
Div. yield
–
E-commerce Software Technology
5 wins
MELI Mercadolibre Inc
$1,810.15 +0.6% 1M -15.7% 1Y
Market cap
$84.59B
P/E
45.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$35.18B
Div. yield
–
Digital Marketplaces Technology
6 wins
DASH DoorDash, Inc.
$179.38 -5.2% 1M -29.5% 1Y
Market cap
$73.02B
P/E
86.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$15.89B
Div. yield
–
Ride-Hailing and Delivery Technology

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Mercadolibre leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Mercadolibre 6, Global-E Online 5). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGLBEMELIDASHLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $7.10B $84.59B $73.02B MELI
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 46.2x 45.4x 86.8x MELI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.4x 44.6x 64.5x GLBE
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +31.4% +46.0% +33.6% MELI
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 13.9% 5.3% 5.3% GLBE
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 16.9% 11.7% — GLBE
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.9x 1.1x — GLBE
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +20.1% -15.7% -29.5% GLBE
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -8.4%/yr +3.8%/yr -3.5%/yr MELI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 46.4% 40.6% 49.6% MELI
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 61/100 62/100 54/100 MELI

Percentile Scorecard

GLBEMELIDASH

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGLBEMELIDASH
Valuation 29 #119 of 167 52 #81 of 167 26 #124 of 167
Growth 99 #3 of 153 80 #32 of 153 83 #27 of 153
Profitability 83 #27 of 153 85 #24 of 153 63 #58 of 153
Financial Health 84 #29 of 179 33 #120 of 179 57 #77 of 179
Shareholder Returns 12 #83 of 94 – 43 #54 of 94
Overall 61 62 54
  • GLBE ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • MELI ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms
  • DASH ranked among 185 companies in Internet Platforms

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGLBEMELIDASHSPY
1 month +0.3%+0.6%-5.2% -1.0%
3 months +14.2%+0.5%+3.7% +2.9%
6 months +30.8%-1.4%+1.5% +6.4%
Year to date +5.2%-10.1%-20.8% +11.4%
1 year +20.1%-15.7%-29.5% +13.1%
3 years +16.8%+48.1%+134.9% +79.4%
3 years, per year +5.3%+14.0%+33.0% +21.5%
5 years -35.6%+20.4%-16.1% +67.7%
5 years, per year -8.4%+3.8%-3.5% +10.9%
10 years —+940.7%— +255.2%
10 years, per year —+26.4%— +13.5%

Risk

MeasureGLBEMELIDASHSPY
Volatility, 1Y 46.4%40.6%49.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 43.9%43.6%52.9% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.021.101.43 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.43-0.39-0.60 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -74.6%-64.2%-82.5% -25.4%
From 52-week high -2.4%-23.3%-32.6% -2.5%
52-week high $42.36$2,360.76$266.06 $779.14
52-week low $27.54$1,546.81$146.60 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGLBEMELIDASH
P/E now vs peer median 45.7xmedian 17.5x 49.3xmedian 17.5x 92.7xmedian 17.5x
P/S now vs peer median 6.3xmedian 1.4x 2.6xmedian 1.4x 4.9xmedian 1.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 35.2xmedian 14.9x 22.4xmedian 14.9x 40.3xmedian 14.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 23.8xmedian 11.2x 7.4xmedian 11.2x 29.9xmedian 11.2x
P/B now vs peer median 7.7xmedian 1.7x 11.7xmedian 1.7x 7.8xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median 1.12median 0.42 1.40median 0.42 2.48median 0.42

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGLBEMELIDASH
Revenue $1.11B $35.18B $15.89B
Gross profit $501.25M $15.01B $8.17B
Operating income $157.99M $2.91B $712.00M
Net income $153.71M $1.86B $841.00M
Free cash flow $293.88M $12.41B $2.60B
R&D $131.84M $2.58B $1.71B
EPS (diluted) $0.87 $36.75 $1.91
Cash & equivalents $285.36M $3.65B $4.42B
Total debt $22.56M $37.59B –
Shares (diluted) 175.99M 50.70M 439.35M
Enterprise value $5.87B $60.61B $52.39B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGLBEMELIDASH
P/E 45.7x 49.3x 92.7x
P/FCF 23.8x 7.4x 29.9x
P/Operating cash flow 23.9x 6.6x 27.5x
P/S 6.3x 2.6x 4.9x
P/B 7.7x 11.7x 7.8x
P/Tangible book 8.1x 11.8x 9.8x
EV/EBITDA 35.2x 22.4x 40.3x
EV/EBIT 42.0x 33.3x 101.6x
EV/Revenue 6.0x 2.7x 4.6x
EV/FCF 22.6x 7.8x 27.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.7x 7.0x 25.6x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.12 1.40 2.48

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGLBEMELIDASH
Revenue growth (1Y) 31.4% 46.0% 33.6%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 30.7% 41.3% 27.4%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 31.7% 35.8% 37.3%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 36.4% 33.9% 32.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 744.3% -2.0% 31.4%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 43.4% 18.1% 38.8%
Net income growth (1Y) 640.9% -9.3% 7.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 42.5% 35.0% 38.6%
EPS growth (1Y) 614.2% -9.3% 7.4%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 41.0% 35.3% 37.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 91.5% 64.1% 29.3%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 86.7% 45.3% 40.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 89.2% 68.0% 30.8%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.0% 44.5% 45.2%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGLBEMELIDASH
Gross margin 45.2% 42.7% 51.4%
EBITDA margin 17.0% 12.3% 11.3%
Operating margin 14.3% 8.3% 4.5%
Pretax margin 14.2% 7.4% 5.5%
Net margin 13.9% 5.3% 5.3%
FCF margin 26.5% 35.3% 16.3%
Operating cash flow margin 26.3% 39.5% 17.8%
Return on equity 16.9% 24.7% 8.3%
Return on assets 11.6% 3.8% 4.3%
Return on invested capital 16.9% 11.7% –
Return on capital employed 17.6% 22.8% 5.3%
Asset turnover 0.8x 0.7x 0.8x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.9x 7.5x 3.4x
Stock comp / revenue 3.7% 0.8% 7.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGLBEMELIDASH
Debt / assets 0.4% 20.7% –
Debt / equity 0.0x 1.4x –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.9x 1.1x –
Debt / FCF 0.0x 0.9x –
Liabilities / assets 33.3% 84.7% 49.3%
Equity / assets 66.7% 15.3% 50.7%
Interest coverage – 13.7x –
Current ratio 2.1x 1.1x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.0x 0.2x 1.1x
Cash ratio 0.8x 0.2x 0.9x
Altman Z-score 10.30 2.42 5.55

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGLBEMELIDASH
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -2.9% – 1.3%
Shareholder yield -2.9% 0.0% 1.3%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGLBEMELIDASH
Forward P/E 35.4xFY2026 44.6xFY2026 64.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $1.17FY2026 $40.57FY2026 $2.78FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +200.0%FY2026 +3.0%FY2026 +30.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +48.7% +41.9% +79.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.29BFY2026 $39.33BFY2026 $18.88BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +33.7%FY2026 +36.1%FY2026 +37.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +29.2% +45.1% +11.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGLBEMELIDASH
Held by institutions 65.3% 77.8% 88.2%
Institutions holding 231 1,438 1,043
Change in shares held, QoQ +0.3% +3.5% +7.4%
Institutions buying 134 714 578
Institutions selling 69 525 349
Buyers to sellers 1.94 1.36 1.66

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GLBEMELIDASH
GLBE 1.00 0.36 0.41
MELI 0.36 1.00 0.47
DASH 0.41 0.47 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GLBE, MELI and DASH?

Mercadolibre (MELI) is the largest by market capitalisation: Global-E Online (GLBE) $7.10B, Mercadolibre (MELI) $84.59B, DoorDash (DASH) $73.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, GLBE, MELI and DASH?

Mercadolibre (MELI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Global-E Online (GLBE) 46.2x, Mercadolibre (MELI) 45.4x, DoorDash (DASH) 86.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Global-E Online (GLBE) is cheapest (Global-E Online (GLBE) 35.4x, Mercadolibre (MELI) 44.6x, DoorDash (DASH) 64.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Mercadolibre (MELI) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Global-E Online (GLBE) +31.4%, Mercadolibre (MELI) +46.0%, DoorDash (DASH) +33.6%.

Which company is more profitable?

Global-E Online (GLBE) has the highest net margin (Global-E Online (GLBE) 13.9%, Mercadolibre (MELI) 5.3%, DoorDash (DASH) 5.3%). On return on invested capital, Global-E Online (GLBE) leads (Global-E Online (GLBE) 16.9%, Mercadolibre (MELI) 11.7%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Global-E Online (GLBE) returned the most: Global-E Online (GLBE) +20.1%, Mercadolibre (MELI) -15.7%, DoorDash (DASH) -29.5%. Over five years, Mercadolibre (MELI) compounded fastest (Global-E Online (GLBE) -8.4%/yr, Mercadolibre (MELI) +3.8%/yr, DoorDash (DASH) -3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Mercadolibre (MELI) has been the steadiest (Global-E Online (GLBE) 46.4%, Mercadolibre (MELI) 40.6%, DoorDash (DASH) 49.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GLBE, MELI and DASH?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Mercadolibre (MELI) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.