GIL vs KTB vs TRON Stock Comparison

Gildan Activewear, Kontoor Brands and Tron Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (PVH) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GIL Gildan Activewear Inc.
$34.87 -16.4% 1M -39.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.46B
P/E
28.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.11B
Div. yield
2.81%
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
3 wins
KTB Kontoor Brands, Inc.
$79.05 +20.0% 1M +2.8% 1Y
Market cap
$4.32B
P/E
21.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.45B
Div. yield
2.68%
Apparel Consumer Discretionary
8 wins
TRON Tron Inc.
$1.35 +4.7% 1M -42.1% 1Y
Market cap
$370.42M
P/E
184.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.84M
Div. yield
–
Toys Consumer Discretionary
1 win

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Kontoor Brands leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Kontoor Brands 8, Gildan Activewear 3, Tron 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGILKTBTRONLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.46B $4.32B $370.42M GIL
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 28.0x 21.4x 184.5x KTB
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 7.3x 14.5x — GIL
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +49.7% +51.4% +10.0% KTB
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 3.9% 5.8% 41.6% TRON
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.9% 14.4% — KTB
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 3.9x 2.1x — KTB
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 2.81% 2.68% — GIL
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -39.9% +2.8% -42.1% KTB
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.9%/yr +6.5%/yr — KTB
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 48.0% 47.2% 95.8% KTB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 52/100 57/100 54/100 KTB

Percentile Scorecard

GILKTBTRON

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGILKTBTRON
Valuation 66 #17 of 48 38 #30 of 48 30 #24 of 34
Growth 58 #20 of 46 76 #12 of 46 71 #10 of 32
Profitability 68 #15 of 45 84 #8 of 45 19 #26 of 32
Financial Health 33 #35 of 52 28 #38 of 52 94 #3 of 33
Shareholder Returns 32 #24 of 35 62 #14 of 35 –
Overall 52 57 54
  • GIL ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • KTB ranked among 52 companies in Apparel and Luxury
  • TRON ranked among 34 companies in Leisure Products

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGILKTBTRONSPY
1 month -16.4%+20.0%+4.7% -5.9%
3 months -40.1%+0.4%-6.2% -4.6%
6 months -41.3%+1.3%-41.3% +0.2%
Year to date -44.2%+29.4%+8.9% +7.5%
1 year -39.9%+2.8%-42.1% +8.2%
3 years +3.8%+59.4%-28.9% +68.3%
3 years, per year +1.2%+16.8%-10.8% +19.0%
5 years -13.6%+36.8%— +56.5%
5 years, per year -2.9%+6.5%— +9.4%
10 years +41.6%—— +251.5%
10 years, per year +3.5%—— +13.4%

Risk

MeasureGILKTBTRONSPY
Volatility, 1Y 48.0%47.2%95.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.2%43.7%86.6% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.620.831.57 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.830.06-0.44 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -52.0%-48.3%-94.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -52.0%-10.3%-49.6% -5.9%
52-week high $72.58$88.17$2.68 $779.14
52-week low $34.87$57.48$1.10 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGILKTBTRON
P/E now vs peer median 28.0xmedian 17.1x 21.4xmedian 17.1x 184.5xmedian 18.6x
P/S now vs peer median 1.3xmedian 0.8x 1.3xmedian 0.8x 76.6xmedian 1.0x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 11.5xmedian 10.6x 10.4xmedian 10.6x -164.9xmedian 9.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 5.7xmedian 11.6x 10.5xmedian 11.6x -208.6xmedian 10.6x
P/B now vs peer median 1.8xmedian 2.4x 7.7xmedian 2.4x 1.5xmedian 1.5x
PEG now vs peer median -1.26median 0.57 -35.94median 0.57 —median 0.94

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGILKTBTRON
Revenue $5.11B $3.45B $4.84M
Gross profit $1.68B $1.72B $1.25M
Operating income $626.98M $468.77M -$2.47M
Net income $199.74M $201.45M $5.46M
Free cash flow $1.14B $413.09M -$1.78M
EPS (diluted) $1.25 $3.69 $0.00
Cash & equivalents $249.91M $56.35M $9.92M
Total debt $3.59B $1.14B –
Shares (diluted) 160.20M 54.63M 476.45M
Enterprise value $5.42B $4.07B $334.14M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGILKTBTRON
P/E 28.0x 21.4x 184.5x
P/FCF 5.7x 10.5x -208.6x
P/Operating cash flow 6.2x 9.9x -208.6x
P/S 1.3x 1.3x 76.6x
P/B 1.8x 7.7x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 10.6x 47.4x 1.5x
EV/EBITDA 11.5x 10.4x -164.9x
EV/EBIT 15.6x 11.5x -146.1x
EV/Revenue 1.9x 1.6x 74.6x
EV/FCF 8.6x 13.1x -203.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 9.4x 12.4x -203.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -1.26 -35.94 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGILKTBTRON
Revenue growth (1Y) 49.7% 51.4% 10.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 17.7% 9.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 32.4% 73.4% 30.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.0% 15.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 12.7% 123.2% 24.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 3.9% 12.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) -9.8% -7.5% 266.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -24.5% -2.0% –
EPS growth (1Y) -60.9% -5.0% 102.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -22.2% -0.6% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) – 74.2% 6.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 27.8% 25.8% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) – 79.9% 6.2%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.2% 29.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGILKTBTRON
Gross margin 32.8% 49.9% 25.8%
EBITDA margin 16.6% 15.1% -45.2%
Operating margin 12.3% 13.6% -51.0%
Pretax margin 11.7% 11.6% 98.3%
Net margin 3.9% 5.8% 41.6%
FCF margin 22.3% 12.0% -36.7%
Operating cash flow margin 20.3% 12.6% -36.7%
Return on equity 1.5% 45.2% -7.8%
Return on assets 0.5% 9.8% -7.7%
Return on invested capital 7.9% 14.4% –
Return on capital employed 7.8% 23.6% -1.1%
Asset turnover 0.5x 1.3x 0.0x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 5.2x 2.2x -0.3x
Stock comp / revenue 0.8% 1.0% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGILKTBTRON
Debt / assets 36.4% 40.8% –
Debt / equity 1.0x 2.0x –
Net debt / EBITDA 3.9x 2.1x –
Debt / FCF 3.1x 2.8x –
Liabilities / assets 63.5% 79.9% 1.1%
Equity / assets 36.5% 20.1% 98.9%
Interest coverage 2.6x 6.9x -65.4x
Current ratio 2.3x 1.7x 30.9x
Quick ratio 0.7x 0.4x 12.5x
Cash ratio 0.1x 0.1x 11.5x
Altman Z-score 1.81 3.27 80.65

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGILKTBTRON
Dividend yield 2.8% 2.7% –
Net buyback yield -2.3% 3.1% –
Shareholder yield 0.5% 5.7% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – 58.0% –
Payout ratio (FCF) – 28.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) – 1.3% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – 2.9% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGILKTBTRON
Forward P/E 7.3xFY2026 14.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $4.79FY2026 $5.46FY2026 –
EPS growth, next FY +36.5%FY2026 -2.3%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +16.7% +11.4% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.65BFY2026 $2.85BFY2026 –
Revenue growth, next FY +56.1%FY2026 -9.5%FY2026 –
Revenue growth, the year after +11.0% -4.8% –

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGILKTBTRON
Held by institutions 100.0% 100.0% 2.3%
Institutions holding 464 433 56
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.8% +6.9% +60.3%
Institutions buying 197 218 44
Institutions selling 149 137 10
Buyers to sellers 1.32 1.59 4.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GILKTBTRON
GIL 1.00 0.35 0.11
KTB 0.35 1.00 0.10
TRON 0.11 0.10 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GIL, KTB and TRON?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) is the largest by market capitalisation: Gildan Activewear (GIL) $6.46B, Kontoor Brands (KTB) $4.32B, Tron (TRON) $370.42M.

Which stock is cheaper, GIL, KTB and TRON?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 28.0x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 21.4x, Tron (TRON) 184.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Gildan Activewear (GIL) is cheapest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 7.3x, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 14.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Kontoor Brands (KTB) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Gildan Activewear (GIL) +49.7%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +51.4%, Tron (TRON) +10.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tron (TRON) has the highest net margin (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 3.9%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 5.8%, Tron (TRON) 41.6%). On return on invested capital, Kontoor Brands (KTB) leads (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 7.9%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 14.4%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Kontoor Brands (KTB) returned the most: Gildan Activewear (GIL) -39.9%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +2.8%, Tron (TRON) -42.1%. Over five years, Kontoor Brands (KTB) compounded fastest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) -2.9%/yr, Kontoor Brands (KTB) +6.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Gildan Activewear (GIL) has the highest dividend yield: Gildan Activewear (GIL) 2.81%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 2.68%. Tron (TRON) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Kontoor Brands (KTB) has been the steadiest (Gildan Activewear (GIL) 48.0%, Kontoor Brands (KTB) 47.2%, Tron (TRON) 95.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GIL, KTB and TRON?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Kontoor Brands (KTB) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.