GIC vs MMM vs PBI Stock Comparison

Global Industrial, 3M and Pitney Bowes Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FAST) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GIC GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co
$44.31 +4.6% 1M +54.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.66B
P/E
19.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.44B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Distribution Industrials
2 wins
MMM 3M Co
$177.38 +5.3% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$90.04B
P/E
25.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
5 wins
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc /De/
$16.47 +1.0% 1M +46.9% 1Y
Market cap
$2.22B
P/E
11.8x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.86B
Div. yield
0.02%
Office Equipment Industrials
5 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

3M leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (3M 5, Pitney Bowes 5, Global Industrial 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGICMMMPBILeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.66B $90.04B $2.22B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.1x 25.5x 11.8x PBI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.8x 20.0x 9.2x PBI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.4% +1.7% -3.5% GIC
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.1% 14.0% 10.1% MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 22.0% 20.3% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — 1.6x 3.9x MMM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.02% PBI
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +54.1% +7.7% +46.9% GIC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.8%/yr +3.5%/yr +18.9%/yr PBI
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.7% 25.6% 34.3% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 50/100 78/100 PBI

Percentile Scorecard

GICMMMPBI

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGICMMMPBI
Valuation 71 #14 of 46 36 #130 of 203 94 #8 of 113
Growth 90 #5 of 39 60 #75 of 188 92 #9 of 96
Profitability 76 #10 of 39 89 #22 of 183 96 #5 of 91
Financial Health 70 #15 of 47 19 #176 of 216 16 #103 of 122
Shareholder Returns 57 #14 of 31 46 #82 of 152 91 #7 of 66
Overall 73 50 78
  • GIC ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • PBI ranked among 130 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGICMMMPBISPY
1 month +4.6%+5.3%+1.0% +0.7%
3 months +25.6%+0.7%-9.2% +3.7%
6 months +33.8%+21.1%+6.5% +7.1%
Year to date +51.6%+10.8%+55.8% +12.8%
1 year +54.1%+7.7%+46.9% +11.9%
3 years +38.9%+137.0%+424.5% +85.2%
3 years, per year +11.6%+33.3%+73.8% +22.8%
5 years +9.2%+18.7%+137.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year +1.8%+3.5%+18.9% +10.9%
10 years +470.3%+28.0%-9.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +19.0%+2.5%-0.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGICMMMPBISPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.7%25.6%34.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.2%24.7%34.6% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.450.680.72 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.110.301.37 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.8%-53.4%-70.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.4%-3.5%-11.1% -1.2%
52-week high $44.94$183.81$18.52 $779.14
52-week low $26.65$141.20$9.02 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGICMMMPBI
P/E now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 26.2x 26.0xmedian 25.8x 12.0xmedian 21.9x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.1x 3.6xmedian 1.9x 1.2xmedian 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 13.5x 16.5xmedian 14.6x 9.3xmedian 11.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.3xmedian 23.0x 34.2xmedian 22.2x 4.4xmedian 14.4x
P/B now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 2.6x 22.0xmedian 2.2x -2.7xmedian 2.4x
PEG now vs peer median 2.36median 2.55 0.73median 1.45 0.23median 0.97

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGICMMMPBI
Revenue $1.44B $25.25B $1.86B
Gross profit $522.40M $9.98B $1.06B
Operating income $115.80M $4.74B $305.03M
Net income $87.10M $3.58B $188.05M
Free cash flow $87.30M $2.68B $504.62M
R&D – $1.21B $14.07M
EPS (diluted) $2.28 $6.77 $1.34
Cash & equivalents $86.70M $4.84B $268.51M
Total debt – $15.00B $1.89B
Shares (diluted) 38.20M 522.60M 140.73M
Enterprise value $1.38B $71.48B $1.05B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGICMMMPBI
P/E 19.4x 26.0x 12.0x
P/FCF 19.3x 34.2x 4.4x
P/Operating cash flow 18.7x 25.3x 3.9x
P/S 1.2x 3.6x 1.2x
P/B 4.9x 22.0x -2.7x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 43.3x -2.6x
EV/EBITDA 13.0x 16.5x 9.3x
EV/EBIT 13.8x 21.4x 12.6x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 4.0x 2.1x
EV/FCF 18.3x 37.9x 7.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.7x 28.0x 6.7x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.36 0.73 0.23

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGICMMMPBI
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.4% 1.7% -3.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.4% 10.7% 9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.7% -1.8% -2.2%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.3% 17.0% -0.3%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.0% -3.7% 87.0%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 33.4% 35.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 31.6% 4.8% 135.1%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.2% 35.4% 47.5%
EPS growth (1Y) 32.3% 7.1% 184.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.2% 35.8% 52.0%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 49.3% 42.8% 94.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.4% -18.1% 12.2%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 52.1% 68.6% 124.1%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.7% -18.0% 11.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGICMMMPBI
Gross margin 36.4% 39.5% 57.1%
EBITDA margin 8.6% 24.4% 22.1%
Operating margin 8.1% 18.8% 16.4%
Pretax margin 8.1% 17.5% 13.7%
Net margin 6.1% 14.0% 10.1%
FCF margin 6.1% 10.6% 27.1%
Operating cash flow margin 6.3% 14.4% 30.6%
Return on equity 26.3% 101.3% –
Return on assets 14.4% 9.8% 6.3%
Return on invested capital – 22.0% 20.3%
Return on capital employed 28.6% 18.7% 20.2%
Asset turnover 2.4x 0.7x 0.6x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x 1.0x 3.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 0.8% 0.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGICMMMPBI
Debt / assets – 37.9% 63.1%
Debt / equity – 3.6x -2.3x
Net debt / EBITDA – 1.6x 3.9x
Debt / FCF – 5.6x 3.7x
Liabilities / assets 45.5% 89.5% 128.0%
Equity / assets 54.5% 10.5% -28.0%
Interest coverage – – 6.0x
Current ratio 2.2x 1.4x 0.7x
Quick ratio 1.4x 0.8x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.4x 0.4x 0.2x
Altman Z-score 7.25 4.14 2.41

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGICMMMPBI
Dividend yield 2.5% 1.7% 2.3%
Net buyback yield 0.1% 3.0% 14.9%
Shareholder yield 2.6% 4.7% 17.2%
Payout ratio (earnings) – 44.8% 29.1%
Payout ratio (FCF) – 59.9% 10.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – 3.2% 19.0%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – -21.4% 16.0%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGICMMMPBI
Forward P/E 19.8xFY2026 20.0xFY2026 9.2xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.24FY2026 $8.88FY2026 $1.79FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +21.1%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 +32.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +3.6% +16.7% +5.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.39BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026 $1.77BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.0%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026 -6.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% +17.6% +10.9%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGICMMMPBI
Held by institutions 33.7% 74.5% 88.8%
Institutions holding 162 2,211 350
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.0% +0.8% +2.6%
Institutions buying 90 916 167
Institutions selling 50 838 119
Buyers to sellers 1.80 1.09 1.40

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GICMMMPBI
GIC 1.00 0.29 0.23
MMM 0.29 1.00 0.14
PBI 0.23 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GIC, MMM and PBI?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Global Industrial (GIC) $1.66B, 3M (MMM) $90.04B, Pitney Bowes (PBI) $2.22B.

Which stock is cheaper, GIC, MMM and PBI?

Pitney Bowes (PBI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Global Industrial (GIC) 19.1x, 3M (MMM) 25.5x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 11.8x). On next year's consensus earnings, Pitney Bowes (PBI) is cheapest (Global Industrial (GIC) 19.8x, 3M (MMM) 20.0x, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 9.2x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Global Industrial (GIC) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Global Industrial (GIC) +8.4%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) -3.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (Global Industrial (GIC) 6.1%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 10.1%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (3M (MMM) 22.0%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 20.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Global Industrial (GIC) returned the most: Global Industrial (GIC) +54.1%, 3M (MMM) +7.7%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +46.9%. Over five years, Pitney Bowes (PBI) compounded fastest (Global Industrial (GIC) +1.8%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.5%/yr, Pitney Bowes (PBI) +18.9%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Pitney Bowes (PBI) has the highest dividend yield: Global Industrial (GIC) 0.00%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 0.02%. Global Industrial (GIC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (Global Industrial (GIC) 25.7%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%, Pitney Bowes (PBI) 34.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GIC, MMM and PBI?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.