GIC vs KODK vs MMM Stock Comparison

Global Industrial, Eastman Kodak and 3M Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FAST) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GIC GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co
$44.31 +4.6% 1M +54.1% 1Y
Market cap
$1.66B
P/E
19.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.44B
Div. yield
–
Industrial Distribution Industrials
4 wins
KODK Eastman Kodak Co
$9.32 -2.9% 1M +44.7% 1Y
Market cap
$852.82M
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.14B
Div. yield
–
Office Equipment Industrials
3 wins
MMM 3M Co
$177.38 +5.3% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$90.04B
P/E
25.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

3M leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (3M 4, Global Industrial 4, Eastman Kodak 3). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGICKODKMMMLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $1.66B $852.82M $90.04B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 19.1x -8.7x 25.5x GIC
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.8x 25.9x 20.0x GIC
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +8.4% +9.5% +1.7% KODK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 6.1% -8.6% 14.0% MMM
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — 4.3% 22.0% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — -3.5x 1.6x KODK
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.02% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +54.1% +44.7% +7.7% GIC
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +1.8%/yr +6.5%/yr +3.5%/yr KODK
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 25.7% 62.7% 25.6% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 73/100 57/100 50/100 GIC

Percentile Scorecard

GICKODKMMM

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGICKODKMMM
Valuation 71 #14 of 46 89 #13 of 113 36 #130 of 203
Growth 90 #5 of 39 71 #29 of 96 60 #75 of 188
Profitability 76 #10 of 39 32 #62 of 91 89 #22 of 183
Financial Health 70 #15 of 47 76 #30 of 122 19 #176 of 216
Shareholder Returns 57 #14 of 31 19 #54 of 66 46 #82 of 152
Overall 73 57 50
  • GIC ranked among 49 companies in Distribution and Rental
  • KODK ranked among 130 companies in Business Services
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGICKODKMMMSPY
1 month +4.6%-2.9%+5.3% +0.7%
3 months +25.6%+11.4%+0.7% +3.7%
6 months +33.8%-30.1%+21.1% +7.1%
Year to date +51.6%+10.2%+10.8% +12.8%
1 year +54.1%+44.7%+7.7% +11.9%
3 years +38.9%+147.9%+137.0% +85.2%
3 years, per year +11.6%+35.4%+33.3% +22.8%
5 years +9.2%+37.3%+18.7% +67.6%
5 years, per year +1.8%+6.5%+3.5% +10.9%
10 years +470.3%-37.9%+28.0% +262.0%
10 years, per year +19.0%-4.6%+2.5% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGICKODKMMMSPY
Volatility, 1Y 25.7%62.7%25.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 25.2%53.6%24.7% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.451.000.68 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 2.110.710.30 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -54.8%-60.3%-53.4% -25.4%
From 52-week high -1.4%-35.8%-3.5% -1.2%
52-week high $44.94$14.51$183.81 $779.14
52-week low $26.65$5.79$141.20 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGICKODKMMM
P/E now vs peer median 19.4xmedian 26.2x -9.3xmedian 21.9x 26.0xmedian 25.8x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 1.1x 0.8xmedian 0.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 13.0xmedian 13.5x 11.8xmedian 11.9x 16.5xmedian 14.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.3xmedian 23.0x 2.0xmedian 14.4x 34.2xmedian 22.2x
P/B now vs peer median 4.9xmedian 2.6x 1.5xmedian 2.4x 22.0xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 2.36median 2.55 0.20median 0.97 0.73median 1.45

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGICKODKMMM
Revenue $1.44B $1.14B $25.25B
Gross profit $522.40M $274.00M $9.98B
Operating income $115.80M $32.00M $4.74B
Net income $87.10M -$94.00M $3.58B
Free cash flow $87.30M $464.00M $2.68B
R&D – $32.00M $1.21B
EPS (diluted) $2.28 $-0.95 $6.77
Cash & equivalents $86.70M $290.00M $4.84B
Total debt – $110.00M $15.00B
Shares (diluted) 38.20M 102.80M 522.60M
Enterprise value $1.38B -$426.18M $71.48B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGICKODKMMM
P/E 19.4x -9.3x 26.0x
P/FCF 19.3x 2.0x 34.2x
P/Operating cash flow 18.7x 1.9x 25.3x
P/S 1.2x 0.8x 3.6x
P/B 4.9x 1.5x 22.0x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 1.5x 43.3x
EV/EBITDA 13.0x 11.8x 16.5x
EV/EBIT 13.8x 22.0x 21.4x
EV/Revenue 1.1x 0.6x 4.0x
EV/FCF 18.3x 1.5x 37.9x
EV/Operating cash flow 17.7x 1.5x 28.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 2.36 0.20 0.73

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGICKODKMMM
Revenue growth (1Y) 8.4% 9.5% 1.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 7.4% -0.9% 10.7%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 12.7% 42.0% -1.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 8.3% 11.2% 17.0%
Operating income growth (1Y) 31.0% 194.1% -3.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 7.9% 66.0% 33.4%
Net income growth (1Y) 31.6% -954.5% 4.8%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 8.2% -47.7% 35.4%
EPS growth (1Y) 32.3% -1,064% 7.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 8.2% -46.6% 35.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 49.3% 1,132% 42.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -8.4% 292.8% -18.1%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 52.1% 529.6% 68.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.7% 174.0% -18.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGICKODKMMM
Gross margin 36.4% 24.1% 39.5%
EBITDA margin 8.6% 5.3% 24.4%
Operating margin 8.1% 2.8% 18.8%
Pretax margin 8.1% -6.6% 17.5%
Net margin 6.1% -8.6% 14.0%
FCF margin 6.1% 40.9% 10.6%
Operating cash flow margin 6.3% 42.7% 14.4%
Return on equity 26.3% -15.4% 101.3%
Return on assets 14.4% -6.1% 9.8%
Return on invested capital – 4.3% 22.0%
Return on capital employed 28.6% 2.5% 18.7%
Asset turnover 2.4x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.0x -5.2x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 0.5% 1.4% 0.8%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGICKODKMMM
Debt / assets – 7.2% 37.9%
Debt / equity – 0.2x 3.6x
Net debt / EBITDA – -3.5x 1.6x
Debt / FCF – 0.2x 5.6x
Liabilities / assets 45.5% 59.2% 89.5%
Equity / assets 54.5% 40.8% 10.5%
Interest coverage – 0.7x –
Current ratio 2.2x 2.9x 1.4x
Quick ratio 1.4x 1.8x 0.8x
Cash ratio 0.4x 1.2x 0.4x
Altman Z-score 7.25 1.34 4.14

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGICKODKMMM
Dividend yield 2.5% – 1.7%
Net buyback yield 0.1% 0.8% 3.0%
Shareholder yield 2.6% 0.8% 4.7%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 44.8%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – 59.9%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 3.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – -21.4%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGICKODKMMM
Forward P/E 19.8xFY2026 25.9xFY2026 20.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $2.24FY2026 $0.36FY2026 $8.88FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +21.1%FY2026 – +10.2%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +3.6% +125.0% +16.7%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.39BFY2026 $1.21BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +1.0%FY2026 +13.1%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +6.8% +9.0% +17.6%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGICKODKMMM
Held by institutions 33.7% 38.7% 74.5%
Institutions holding 162 179 2,211
Change in shares held, QoQ +12.0% +11.9% +0.8%
Institutions buying 90 112 916
Institutions selling 50 35 838
Buyers to sellers 1.80 3.20 1.09

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GICKODKMMM
GIC 1.00 0.10 0.29
KODK 0.10 1.00 0.14
MMM 0.29 0.14 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GIC, KODK and MMM?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Global Industrial (GIC) $1.66B, Eastman Kodak (KODK) $852.82M, 3M (MMM) $90.04B.

Which stock is cheaper, GIC, KODK and MMM?

Global Industrial (GIC) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Global Industrial (GIC) 19.1x, Eastman Kodak (KODK) -8.7x, 3M (MMM) 25.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Global Industrial (GIC) is cheapest (Global Industrial (GIC) 19.8x, Eastman Kodak (KODK) 25.9x, 3M (MMM) 20.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Eastman Kodak (KODK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Global Industrial (GIC) +8.4%, Eastman Kodak (KODK) +9.5%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

3M (MMM) has the highest net margin (Global Industrial (GIC) 6.1%, Eastman Kodak (KODK) -8.6%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (Eastman Kodak (KODK) 4.3%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Global Industrial (GIC) returned the most: Global Industrial (GIC) +54.1%, Eastman Kodak (KODK) +44.7%, 3M (MMM) +7.7%. Over five years, Eastman Kodak (KODK) compounded fastest (Global Industrial (GIC) +1.8%/yr, Eastman Kodak (KODK) +6.5%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Global Industrial (GIC) 0.00%, Eastman Kodak (KODK) 0.00%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%. Global Industrial (GIC) and Eastman Kodak (KODK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (Global Industrial (GIC) 25.7%, Eastman Kodak (KODK) 62.7%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GIC, KODK and MMM?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.