GEV vs VRT vs AMSC Stock Comparison

GE Vernova, Vertiv Holdings and American Superconductor Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (FPS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
GEV GE Vernova Inc.
$895.52 -6.4% 1M +53.2% 1Y
Market cap
$235.57B
P/E
24.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$41.37B
Div. yield
–
Power Equipment Industrials
7 wins
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co
$208.78 -17.6% 1M +8.2% 1Y
Market cap
$93.47B
P/E
54.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Electrical Equipment Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

GE Vernova leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (GE Vernova 7, Vertiv Holdings 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionGEVVRTAMSCLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $235.57B $93.47B $1.28B GEV
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.7x 54.0x — GEV
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS — 30.2x 30.7x VRT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +13.0% +26.2% — VRT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 23.0% 15.1% — GEV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 10.7% 24.0% — VRT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -3.4x -0.1x — GEV
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +53.2% +8.2% -52.2% GEV
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years — +52.1%/yr +8.7%/yr VRT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 53.9% 66.0% 85.9% GEV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 83/100 59/100 — GEV

Percentile Scorecard

GEVVRTAMSC

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisGEVVRTAMSC
Valuation 75 #16 of 61 26 #150 of 203 –
Growth 98 #2 of 58 100 #2 of 188 –
Profitability 91 #6 of 55 100 #2 of 183 –
Financial Health 57 #31 of 71 56 #96 of 217 76 #18 of 71
Shareholder Returns 93 #3 of 30 16 #129 of 153 –
Overall 83 59 –
  • GEV ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment
  • VRT ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • AMSC ranked among 71 companies in Clean Energy Equipment

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodGEVVRTAMSCSPY
1 month -6.4%-17.6%-7.9% -0.2%
3 months -5.1%-22.5%-3.9% +3.9%
6 months -17.8%-31.6%-41.8% +8.2%
Year to date +37.0%+28.9%-4.0% +12.9%
1 year +53.2%+8.2%-52.2% +12.3%
3 years —+473.3%+344.9% +87.4%
3 years, per year —+79.0%+64.5% +23.3%
5 years —+712.4%+51.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year —+52.1%+8.7% +10.9%
10 years ——+302.2% +261.1%
10 years, per year ——+14.9% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureGEVVRTAMSCSPY
Volatility, 1Y 53.9%66.0%85.9% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 53.9%67.0%98.8% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 2.152.903.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.990.12-0.61 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.3%-70.2%-82.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -23.8%-44.5%-56.1% -1.2%
52-week high $1,174.86$376.23$63.01 $779.14
52-week low $547.96$149.83$25.01 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleGEVVRTAMSC
P/E now vs peer median 25.2xmedian 27.2x 46.4xmedian 25.2x —median 27.2x
P/S now vs peer median 5.8xmedian 2.4x 7.0xmedian 1.9x —median 2.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 76.0xmedian 18.4x 31.3xmedian 14.0x —median 18.4x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.2xmedian 28.6x 27.4xmedian 21.7x —median 28.6x
P/B now vs peer median 18.2xmedian 1.7x 16.9xmedian 2.3x 2.4xmedian 1.7x
PEG now vs peer median —median 0.79 0.42median 1.32 —median 0.79

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsGEVVRTAMSC
Revenue $41.37B $11.48B –
Gross profit $8.36B $4.37B –
Operating income $1.80B $2.17B –
Net income $9.54B $1.73B –
Free cash flow $12.44B $2.93B –
R&D $1.31B – –
EPS (diluted) $35.29 $4.41 –
Cash & equivalents $13.12B $2.81B $140.69M
Total debt $2.79B $2.94B –
Shares (diluted) 270.00M 392.75M 44.94M
Enterprise value $195.48B $84.09B $579.35M

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricGEVVRTAMSC
P/E 25.2x 46.4x –
P/FCF 19.2x 27.4x –
P/Operating cash flow 16.9x 24.0x –
P/S 5.8x 7.0x –
P/B 18.2x 16.9x 2.4x
P/Tangible book 27.7x 27.2x 2.4x
EV/EBITDA 76.0x 31.3x –
EV/EBIT 126.8x 36.9x –
EV/Revenue 5.5x 7.0x –
EV/FCF 18.3x 27.4x –
EV/Operating cash flow 16.1x 23.9x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) – 0.42 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricGEVVRTAMSC
Revenue growth (1Y) 13.0% 26.2% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) – 21.6% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 27.7% 36.0% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – 29.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 174.7% 39.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) – 55.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 719.9% 113.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) – 112.2% –
EPS growth (1Y) 742.6% 111.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) – 110.3% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 295.4% 135.1% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 91.1% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 359.3% 134.8% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) – 100.2% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricGEVVRTAMSC
Gross margin 20.2% 38.0% –
EBITDA margin 7.3% 22.3% –
Operating margin 4.3% 18.9% –
Pretax margin 19.0% 18.4% –
Net margin 23.0% 15.1% –
FCF margin 30.1% 25.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 34.2% 29.2% –
Return on equity 67.6% 38.5% –
Return on assets 12.2% 11.8% –
Return on invested capital 10.7% 24.0% –
Return on capital employed 8.0% 29.4% –
Asset turnover 0.5x 0.8x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.5x 1.9x –
Stock comp / revenue – 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricGEVVRTAMSC
Debt / assets 3.5% 18.5% –
Debt / equity 0.2x 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA -3.4x -0.1x –
Debt / FCF 0.2x 1.0x –
Liabilities / assets 83.8% 70.1% 24.9%
Equity / assets 16.2% 29.9% 75.1%
Interest coverage 9.5x 41.4x –
Current ratio 0.8x 1.4x 2.4x
Quick ratio 0.6x 0.9x 1.6x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.4x 1.0x
Altman Z-score 2.77 5.87 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricGEVVRTAMSC
Dividend yield 0.2% 0.1% –
Net buyback yield 2.3% -0.1% –
Shareholder yield 2.5% 0.0% –
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusGEVVRTAMSC
Forward P/E – 30.2xFY2026 30.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year – $6.91FY2026 $0.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY – +64.5%FY2026 -75.0%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after – +40.2% +40.0%
Revenue, next fiscal year – $14.66BFY2026 $383.43MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY – +43.3%FY2026 +28.2%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after – +20.2% +15.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersGEVVRTAMSC
Held by institutions 79.1% 81.7% 73.7%
Institutions holding 3,416 2,038 277
Change in shares held, QoQ +4.0% +0.0% +6.4%
Institutions buying 1,952 1,170 173
Institutions selling 982 691 77
Buyers to sellers 1.99 1.69 2.25

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

GEVVRTAMSC
GEV 1.00 0.66 0.51
VRT 0.66 1.00 0.55
AMSC 0.51 0.55 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, GEV, VRT and AMSC?

GE Vernova (GEV) is the largest by market capitalisation: GE Vernova (GEV) $235.57B, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) $93.47B, American Superconductor (AMSC) $1.28B.

Which stock is cheaper, GEV, VRT and AMSC?

GE Vernova (GEV) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (GE Vernova (GEV) 24.7x, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 54.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) is cheapest (Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 30.2x, American Superconductor (AMSC) 30.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Vertiv Holdings (VRT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: GE Vernova (GEV) +13.0%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) +26.2%.

Which company is more profitable?

GE Vernova (GEV) has the highest net margin (GE Vernova (GEV) 23.0%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 15.1%). On return on invested capital, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) leads (GE Vernova (GEV) 10.7%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 24.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year GE Vernova (GEV) returned the most: GE Vernova (GEV) +53.2%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) +8.2%, American Superconductor (AMSC) -52.2%. Over five years, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) compounded fastest (Vertiv Holdings (VRT) +52.1%/yr, American Superconductor (AMSC) +8.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, GE Vernova (GEV) has been the steadiest (GE Vernova (GEV) 53.9%, Vertiv Holdings (VRT) 66.0%, American Superconductor (AMSC) 85.9%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, GEV, VRT and AMSC?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, GE Vernova (GEV) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.