FTV vs MMM vs ZBRA Stock Comparison

Fortive, 3M and Zebra Technologies Prices as of Oct 29, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AME) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FTV Fortive Corp
$65.86 +18.9% 1M +30.8% 1Y
Market cap
$19.53B
P/E
30.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.40B
Div. yield
0.00%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win
MMM 3M Co
$177.38 +5.3% 1M +7.7% 1Y
Market cap
$90.04B
P/E
25.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$25.25B
Div. yield
0.02%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
7 wins
ZBRA Zebra Technologies Corp
$377.38 +0.4% 1M +39.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.11B
P/E
31.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.85B
Div. yield
–
Electronic Components Technology
4 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

3M leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (3M 7, Zebra Technologies 4, Fortive 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTVMMMZBRALeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.53B $90.04B $17.11B MMM
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 30.0x 25.5x 31.7x MMM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 20.6x 20.0x 16.7x ZBRA
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.0% +1.7% +12.7% ZBRA
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 14.8% 14.0% 9.2% FTV
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 8.1% 22.0% 10.6% MMM
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.6x 2.4x MMM
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.02% 0.00% MMM
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +30.8% +7.7% +39.4% ZBRA
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.8%/yr +3.5%/yr -6.7%/yr MMM
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 27.0% 25.6% 45.5% MMM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 49/100 50/100 62/100 ZBRA

Percentile Scorecard

FTVMMMZBRA

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTVMMMZBRA
Valuation 47 #108 of 203 36 #130 of 203 69 #35 of 112
Growth 26 #140 of 188 60 #75 of 188 46 #59 of 108
Profitability 76 #45 of 183 89 #22 of 183 85 #17 of 104
Financial Health 38 #135 of 216 19 #176 of 216 17 #96 of 116
Shareholder Returns 58 #65 of 152 46 #82 of 152 92 #7 of 78
Overall 49 50 62
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • MMM ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ZBRA ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTVMMMZBRASPY
1 month +18.9%+5.3%+0.4% +0.7%
3 months +12.6%+0.7%+30.8% +3.7%
6 months +10.2%+21.1%+66.8% +7.1%
Year to date +19.3%+10.8%+55.4% +12.8%
1 year +30.8%+7.7%+39.4% +11.9%
3 years +1.3%+137.0%+79.9% +85.2%
3 years, per year +0.4%+33.3%+21.6% +22.8%
5 years -13.0%+18.7%-29.3% +67.6%
5 years, per year -2.8%+3.5%-6.7% +10.9%
10 years +31.2%+28.0%+469.5% +262.0%
10 years, per year +2.8%+2.5%+19.0% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFTVMMMZBRASPY
Volatility, 1Y 27.0%25.6%45.5% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.1%24.7%38.1% 12.6%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.600.681.70 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.140.300.87 0.94
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.1%-53.4%-67.8% -25.4%
From 52-week high 0.0%-3.5%-3.5% -1.2%
52-week high $65.86$183.81$391.00 $779.14
52-week low $50.10$141.20$199.30 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTVMMMZBRA
P/E now vs peer median 30.3xmedian 25.8x 26.0xmedian 25.8x 33.4xmedian 32.9x
P/S now vs peer median 4.5xmedian 1.9x 3.6xmedian 1.9x 3.1xmedian 2.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.3xmedian 14.6x 16.5xmedian 14.6x 19.1xmedian 20.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 18.1xmedian 22.2x 34.2xmedian 22.2x 19.8xmedian 30.2x
P/B now vs peer median 3.3xmedian 2.2x 22.0xmedian 2.2x 5.2xmedian 2.9x
PEG now vs peer median -11.48median 1.45 0.73median 1.45 -8.84median 1.08

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTVMMMZBRA
Revenue $4.40B $25.25B $5.85B
Gross profit $2.79B $9.98B $2.90B
Operating income $863.00M $4.74B $858.00M
Net income $651.90M $3.58B $539.00M
Free cash flow $1.09B $2.68B $904.00M
R&D $268.20M $1.21B $622.00M
EPS (diluted) $2.15 $6.77 $11.20
Cash & equivalents $377.30M $4.84B $157.00M
Total debt $3.51B $15.00B $2.77B
Shares (diluted) 303.90M 522.60M 48.13M
Enterprise value $18.04B $71.48B $15.66B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTVMMMZBRA
P/E 30.3x 26.0x 33.4x
P/FCF 18.1x 34.2x 19.8x
P/Operating cash flow 16.4x 25.3x 18.2x
P/S 4.5x 3.6x 3.1x
P/B 3.3x 22.0x 5.2x
P/Tangible book 4.9x 43.3x 6.6x
EV/EBITDA 17.3x 16.5x 19.1x
EV/EBIT 26.4x 21.4x 23.9x
EV/Revenue 5.2x 4.0x 3.5x
EV/FCF 21.0x 37.9x 22.6x
EV/Operating cash flow 19.0x 28.0x 20.9x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -11.48 0.73 -8.84

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTVMMMZBRA
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.0% 1.7% 12.7%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 10.7% 2.1%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 6.2% -1.8% 14.9%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -7.6% 17.0% 4.2%
Operating income growth (1Y) 22.1% -3.7% 8.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -8.1% 33.4% -0.9%
Net income growth (1Y) 8.2% 4.8% -1.6%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -7.7% 35.4% -6.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 18.7% 7.1% 4.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) -2.6% 35.8% -3.8%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -1.6% 42.8% 5.8%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.3% -18.1% 63.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -3.3% 68.6% 6.0%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -4.9% -18.0% 83.6%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTVMMMZBRA
Gross margin 63.5% 39.5% 49.6%
EBITDA margin 29.9% 24.4% 18.3%
Operating margin 19.6% 18.8% 14.7%
Pretax margin 16.8% 17.5% 12.1%
Net margin 14.8% 14.0% 9.2%
FCF margin 24.7% 10.6% 15.5%
Operating cash flow margin 27.3% 14.4% 16.7%
Return on equity 10.8% 101.3% 15.6%
Return on assets 5.6% 9.8% 6.4%
Return on invested capital 8.1% 22.0% 10.6%
Return on capital employed 8.4% 18.7% 19.1%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.7x 0.7x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.8x 1.0x 1.8x
Stock comp / revenue 2.0% 0.8% 3.0%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTVMMMZBRA
Debt / assets 30.6% 37.9% 32.0%
Debt / equity 0.6x 3.6x 0.8x
Net debt / EBITDA 2.4x 1.6x 2.4x
Debt / FCF 3.2x 5.6x 3.1x
Liabilities / assets 48.2% 89.5% 60.2%
Equity / assets 51.8% 10.5% 39.8%
Interest coverage 4.9x – –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.4x 0.5x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.8x 0.3x
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.4x 0.0x
Altman Z-score 3.49 4.14 3.71

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTVMMMZBRA
Dividend yield 0.4% 1.7% –
Net buyback yield 6.5% 3.0% 5.1%
Shareholder yield 6.9% 4.7% 5.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) 11.7% 44.8% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 7.0% 59.9% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -24.4% 3.2% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -8.3% -21.4% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTVMMMZBRA
Forward P/E 20.6xFY2026 20.0xFY2026 16.7xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.20FY2026 $8.88FY2026 $22.59FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.1%FY2026 +10.2%FY2026 +42.6%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.1% +16.7% -4.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.63BFY2026 $23.87BFY2026 $6.35BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.4%FY2026 -1.8%FY2026 +17.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.7% +17.6% +1.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTVMMMZBRA
Held by institutions 100.0% 74.5% 100.0%
Institutions holding 804 2,211 645
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +0.8% +4.5%
Institutions buying 351 916 309
Institutions selling 301 838 242
Buyers to sellers 1.17 1.09 1.28

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTVMMMZBRA
FTV 1.00 0.38 0.31
MMM 0.38 1.00 0.35
ZBRA 0.31 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTV, MMM and ZBRA?

3M (MMM) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fortive (FTV) $19.53B, 3M (MMM) $90.04B, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) $17.11B.

Which stock is cheaper, FTV, MMM and ZBRA?

3M (MMM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fortive (FTV) 30.0x, 3M (MMM) 25.5x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 31.7x). On next year's consensus earnings, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) is cheapest (Fortive (FTV) 20.6x, 3M (MMM) 20.0x, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 16.7x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fortive (FTV) +7.0%, 3M (MMM) +1.7%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +12.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortive (FTV) has the highest net margin (Fortive (FTV) 14.8%, 3M (MMM) 14.0%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 9.2%). On return on invested capital, 3M (MMM) leads (Fortive (FTV) 8.1%, 3M (MMM) 22.0%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 10.6%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) returned the most: Fortive (FTV) +30.8%, 3M (MMM) +7.7%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) +39.4%. Over five years, 3M (MMM) compounded fastest (Fortive (FTV) -2.8%/yr, 3M (MMM) +3.5%/yr, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) -6.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

3M (MMM) has the highest dividend yield: Fortive (FTV) 0.00%, 3M (MMM) 0.02%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 0.00%. Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, 3M (MMM) has been the steadiest (Fortive (FTV) 27.0%, 3M (MMM) 25.6%, Zebra Technologies (ZBRA) 45.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTV, MMM and ZBRA?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, 3M (MMM) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.