FTV vs AME vs ITW Stock Comparison

Fortive, Ametek and Illinois Tool Works Prices as of Oct 27, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (RRX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FTV Fortive Corp
$61.62 +9.8% 1M +24.6% 1Y
Market cap
$19.41B
P/E
36.3x
Revenue (TTM)
$4.32B
Div. yield
0.00%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
1 win
AME Ametek Inc/
$246.27 -1.9% 1M +31.9% 1Y
Market cap
$56.92B
P/E
36.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.86B
Div. yield
0.01%
Industrial Machinery Industrials
8 wins
ITW Illinois Tool Works Inc
$275.93 +0.7% 1M +11.3% 1Y
Market cap
$79.02B
P/E
24.0x
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Industrial Machinery Industrials
3 wins

Head to Head

12 decided of 12

Ametek leads on 8 of the 12 questions below (Ametek 8, Illinois Tool Works 3, Fortive 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTVAMEITWLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $19.41B $56.92B $79.02B ITW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 36.3x 36.1x 24.0x ITW
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 19.3x 30.0x 25.9x FTV
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +5.6% +12.7% — AME
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 12.4% 20.0% — AME
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 7.4% 12.8% — AME
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 0.6x — AME
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.01% 0.00% AME
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +24.6% +31.9% +11.3% AME
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -3.8%/yr +13.3%/yr +4.0%/yr AME
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 26.7% 23.9% 21.3% ITW
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 47/100 62/100 49/100 AME

Percentile Scorecard

FTVAMEITW

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTVAMEITW
Valuation 45 #112 of 203 18 #167 of 203 24 #154 of 203
Growth 19 #153 of 188 60 #76 of 188 35 #123 of 188
Profitability 73 #50 of 183 93 #14 of 183 –
Financial Health 39 #133 of 217 69 #69 of 217 –
Shareholder Returns 61 #61 of 153 68 #49 of 153 87 #21 of 153
Overall 47 62 49
  • FTV ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • AME ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • ITW ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTVAMEITWSPY
1 month +9.8%-1.9%+0.7% -0.2%
3 months -4.0%+2.0%-6.5% +3.9%
6 months -0.2%+7.6%+2.8% +8.2%
Year to date +11.6%+20.0%+12.0% +12.9%
1 year +24.6%+31.9%+11.3% +12.3%
3 years -5.2%+76.9%+23.6% +87.4%
3 years, per year -1.8%+21.0%+7.3% +23.3%
5 years -17.8%+86.6%+21.8% +67.9%
5 years, per year -3.8%+13.3%+4.0% +10.9%
10 years +29.8%+457.3%+143.5% +261.1%
10 years, per year +2.6%+18.7%+9.3% +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFTVAMEITWSPY
Volatility, 1Y 26.7%23.9%21.3% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 26.0%22.8%20.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.600.980.47 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.921.340.53 0.97
Max drawdown, 5Y -46.1%-27.3%-28.9% -25.4%
From 52-week high -4.0%-4.7%-7.9% -1.2%
52-week high $64.16$258.54$299.60 $779.14
52-week low $49.16$184.19$241.07 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTVAMEITW
P/E now vs peer median 35.1xmedian 25.2x 35.8xmedian 25.2x 24.0xmedian 25.2x
P/S now vs peer median 4.3xmedian 1.9x 7.2xmedian 1.9x 4.6xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 17.6xmedian 14.0x 23.6xmedian 14.0x —median 14.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 19.9xmedian 21.7x 30.9xmedian 21.7x 26.0xmedian 21.7x
P/B now vs peer median 3.1xmedian 2.3x 5.0xmedian 2.3x 25.0xmedian 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median -4.25median 1.32 4.11median 1.32 —median 1.32

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTVAMEITW
Revenue $4.32B $7.86B –
Gross profit $2.73B $2.86B –
Operating income $786.70M $2.04B –
Net income $534.40M $1.58B $3.23B
Free cash flow $937.60M $1.82B –
R&D $262.00M – –
EPS (diluted) $1.74 $6.86 –
Cash & equivalents $374.20M $495.45M $809.00M
Total debt $3.51B $2.04B –
Shares (diluted) 307.60M 229.86M 287.00M
Enterprise value $17.87B $55.04B $79.02B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTVAMEITW
P/E 35.1x 35.8x 24.0x
P/FCF 19.9x 30.9x 26.0x
P/Operating cash flow 17.7x 28.8x 24.1x
P/S 4.3x 7.2x 4.6x
P/B 3.1x 5.0x 25.0x
P/Tangible book 4.6x 8.0x 30.2x
EV/EBITDA 17.6x 23.6x –
EV/EBIT 27.7x 28.5x –
EV/Revenue 5.0x 7.4x –
EV/FCF 23.2x 31.8x –
EV/Operating cash flow 20.7x 29.6x 24.1x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -4.25 4.11 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTVAMEITW
Revenue growth (1Y) 5.6% 12.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) -10.3% 7.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 4.2% 13.4% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) -7.9% 7.9% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 9.4% 11.2% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) -9.9% 8.2% –
Net income growth (1Y) -30.5% 9.6% 6.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) -12.6% 8.5% 0.9%
EPS growth (1Y) -22.8% 10.4% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) -8.3% 8.7% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) -30.6% 8.1% -0.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) -6.6% 11.0% -0.5%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -34.8% 8.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -7.5% 12.0% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTVAMEITW
Gross margin 63.2% 36.4% –
EBITDA margin 28.6% 31.2% –
Operating margin 18.2% 25.9% –
Pretax margin 15.6% 24.3% –
Net margin 12.4% 20.0% –
FCF margin 21.7% 23.2% –
Operating cash flow margin 24.4% 24.9% –
Return on equity 8.8% 14.2% 106.9%
Return on assets 4.6% 9.6% –
Return on invested capital 7.4% 12.8% –
Return on capital employed 7.6% 14.8% –
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.5x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.0x 1.2x 1.0x
Stock comp / revenue 2.7% 0.6% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTVAMEITW
Debt / assets 30.2% 12.3% –
Debt / equity 0.6x 0.2x –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.5x 0.6x –
Debt / FCF 3.7x 1.1x –
Liabilities / assets 47.7% 32.1% –
Equity / assets 52.3% 67.9% –
Interest coverage 12.8x 21.1x –
Current ratio 1.2x 1.2x 1.3x
Quick ratio 0.9x 0.6x –
Cash ratio 0.3x 0.2x –
Altman Z-score 3.33 8.36 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTVAMEITW
Dividend yield 0.4% 0.5% 2.4%
Net buyback yield 10.6% 0.7% –
Shareholder yield 11.0% 1.2% 2.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) 10.6% 18.9% –
Payout ratio (FCF) 6.0% 16.3% –
Dividend growth (1Y) -48.4% 9.4% –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) -17.0% 11.3% –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTVAMEITW
Forward P/E 19.3xFY2026 30.0xFY2026 25.9xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.20FY2026 $8.20FY2026 $10.67FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +18.1%FY2026 +10.4%FY2026 +1.7%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -3.1% +8.4% +19.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $4.63BFY2026 $7.96BFY2026 $16.46BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +11.4%FY2026 +7.5%FY2026 +2.6%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -6.7% +18.3% +11.4%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTVAMEITW
Held by institutions 100.0% 89.6% 84.9%
Institutions holding 803 1,195 1,969
Change in shares held, QoQ +2.8% +2.3% +0.8%
Institutions buying 350 615 846
Institutions selling 301 399 750
Buyers to sellers 1.16 1.54 1.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTVAMEITW
FTV 1.00 0.37 0.58
AME 0.37 1.00 0.49
ITW 0.58 0.49 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTV, AME and ITW?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fortive (FTV) $19.41B, Ametek (AME) $56.92B, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) $79.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, FTV, AME and ITW?

Illinois Tool Works (ITW) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fortive (FTV) 36.3x, Ametek (AME) 36.1x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 24.0x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fortive (FTV) is cheapest (Fortive (FTV) 19.3x, Ametek (AME) 30.0x, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 25.9x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Ametek (AME) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fortive (FTV) +5.6%, Ametek (AME) +12.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ametek (AME) has the highest net margin (Fortive (FTV) 12.4%, Ametek (AME) 20.0%). On return on invested capital, Ametek (AME) leads (Fortive (FTV) 7.4%, Ametek (AME) 12.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Ametek (AME) returned the most: Fortive (FTV) +24.6%, Ametek (AME) +31.9%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +11.3%. Over five years, Ametek (AME) compounded fastest (Fortive (FTV) -3.8%/yr, Ametek (AME) +13.3%/yr, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) +4.0%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Ametek (AME) has the highest dividend yield: Fortive (FTV) 0.00%, Ametek (AME) 0.01%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 0.00%. Illinois Tool Works (ITW) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) has been the steadiest (Fortive (FTV) 26.7%, Ametek (AME) 23.9%, Illinois Tool Works (ITW) 21.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTV, AME and ITW?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Ametek (AME) leads on 8. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.