FTNT vs UI vs RBRK Stock Comparison

Fortinet, Ubiquiti and Rubrik Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ZS) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$129.39 -29.7% 1M +51.8% 1Y
Market cap
$95.05B
P/E
41.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
5 wins
UI Ubiquiti Inc.
$562.41 -7.7% 1M -25.9% 1Y
Market cap
$34.04B
P/E
35.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$3.27B
Div. yield
0.60%
Networking Equipment Technology
3 wins
RBRK Rubrik, Inc.
$118.98 -3.0% 1M +63.9% 1Y
Market cap
$24.65B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.54B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 5, Ubiquiti 3, Rubrik 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTNTUIRBRKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $95.05B $34.04B $24.65B FTNT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 41.6x 35.4x -96.4x UI
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 36.1x 29.8x 224.5x UI
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +27.2% +42.4% RBRK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.0% 29.3% -16.5% UI
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 88.9% 72.8% — FTNT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — 0.60% — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.8% -25.9% +63.9% RBRK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.7%/yr +12.7%/yr — FTNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.4% 54.4% 66.1% FTNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 67/100 54/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

FTNTUIRBRK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTNTUIRBRK
Valuation 61 #49 of 124 26 #83 of 112 50 #63 of 124
Growth 67 #38 of 114 88 #14 of 108 92 #10 of 114
Profitability 100 #1 of 111 98 #3 of 104 56 #50 of 111
Financial Health 57 #56 of 128 74 #31 of 116 24 #97 of 128
Shareholder Returns 67 #25 of 73 48 #45 of 85 50 #37 of 73
Overall 70 67 54
  • FTNT ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • UI ranked among 121 companies in Computer Hardware
  • RBRK ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTNTUIRBRKSPY
1 month -29.7%-7.7%-3.0% -1.0%
3 months -21.2%-1.0%+40.3% -0.4%
6 months +43.8%-45.3%+105.9% +4.5%
Year to date +62.9%+1.6%+55.6% +12.4%
1 year +51.8%-25.9%+63.9% +13.6%
3 years +156.3%+428.8%— +76.4%
3 years, per year +36.9%+74.3%— +20.8%
5 years +89.6%+82.1%— +63.7%
5 years, per year +13.7%+12.7%— +10.4%
10 years +1,993.7%+951.2%— +267.7%
10 years, per year +35.6%+26.5%— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureFTNTUIRBRKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.4%54.4%66.1% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.1%60.8%60.7% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.051.711.71 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.05-0.480.97 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.3%-70.0%-56.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.6%-48.1%-12.6% -1.6%
52-week high $194.75$1,084.50$136.14 $779.14
52-week low $75.23$515.44$43.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTNTUIRBRK
P/E now vs peer median 41.6xmedian 41.0x 35.4xmedian 28.1x -96.4xmedian 41.0x
P/S now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 4.4x 10.4xmedian 2.6x 16.0xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 28.9xmedian 28.9x 27.7xmedian 18.4x -193.0xmedian 28.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.7xmedian 23.9x 37.4xmedian 26.6x 81.1xmedian 23.9x
P/B now vs peer median 42.3xmedian 3.1x 23.6xmedian 2.8x -49.4xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 1.47median 1.36 1.07median 1.11 —median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTNTUIRBRK
Revenue $7.88B $3.27B $1.54B
Gross profit $6.29B $1.51B $1.24B
Operating income $2.60B $1.19B -$282.40M
Net income $2.28B $960.30M -$254.43M
Free cash flow $3.43B $908.94M $303.91M
R&D $857.40M $204.17M $440.96M
EPS (diluted) $3.07 $15.85 $-1.23
Cash & equivalents $3.75B $522.58M $416.17M
Total debt $497.10M – –
Shares (diluted) 742.60M 60.57M 206.10M
Enterprise value $79.30B $32.58B $17.88B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTNTUIRBRK
P/E 41.6x 35.4x -96.4x
P/FCF 27.7x 37.4x 81.1x
P/Operating cash flow 25.8x 36.7x 73.1x
P/S 12.1x 10.4x 16.0x
P/B 42.3x 23.6x -49.4x
P/Tangible book 43.8x 23.6x -49.4x
EV/EBITDA 28.9x 27.7x -193.0x
EV/EBIT 34.9x 28.2x -81.1x
EV/Revenue 11.5x 10.2x 14.9x
EV/FCF 26.4x 36.8x 75.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.6x 36.0x 68.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.47 1.07 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTNTUIRBRK
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 27.2% 42.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.1% 19.0% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.6% 35.3% 46.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.7% 25.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 27.8% 41.8% 34.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.9% 29.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 21.8% 34.9% 42.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 25.6% 33.1% –
EPS growth (1Y) 24.9% 34.8% 45.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.3% 33.0% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 50.6% 45.1% 59.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 103.2% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 69.2% 44.9% 56.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.5% 95.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTNTUIRBRK
Gross margin 79.7% 46.2% 80.2%
EBITDA margin 39.8% 36.8% -7.7%
Operating margin 33.0% 36.2% -18.3%
Pretax margin 35.3% 36.1% -14.6%
Net margin 29.0% 29.3% -16.5%
FCF margin 43.5% 27.8% 19.7%
Operating cash flow margin 46.8% 28.4% 21.9%
Return on equity 120.1% 72.7% –
Return on assets 20.0% 49.1% -9.1%
Return on invested capital 88.9% 72.8% –
Return on capital employed 41.2% 89.1% -19.8%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.7x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.0x -1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% 0.2% 22.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTNTUIRBRK
Debt / assets 4.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.4x – –
Debt / FCF 0.1x – –
Liabilities / assets 81.2% 34.5% 117.5%
Equity / assets 18.8% 65.5% -17.5%
Interest coverage 175.6x – -65.0x
Current ratio 1.4x 2.9x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.5x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.9x 1.0x 1.3x
Altman Z-score 7.50 31.78 3.39

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTNTUIRBRK
Dividend yield – 0.6% –
Net buyback yield 1.0% – -0.1%
Shareholder yield 1.0% 0.6% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTNTUIRBRK
Forward P/E 36.1xFY2026 29.8xFY2027 224.5xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.58FY2026 $18.88FY2027 $0.53FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +29.7%FY2026 +18.4%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +0.8% +9.2% +41.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.38BFY2026 $4.12BFY2027 $1.78BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.2%FY2026 +25.9%FY2027 +34.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.2% +5.9% +12.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTNTUIRBRK
Held by institutions 68.6% 4.9% 80.7%
Institutions holding 1,570 356 574
Change in shares held, QoQ +23.7% +8.0% +12.3%
Institutions buying 855 163 406
Institutions selling 551 139 116
Buyers to sellers 1.55 1.17 3.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTNTUIRBRK
FTNT 1.00 -0.03 0.55
UI -0.03 1.00 0.12
RBRK 0.55 0.12 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTNT, UI and RBRK?

Fortinet (FTNT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fortinet (FTNT) $95.05B, Ubiquiti (UI) $34.04B, Rubrik (RBRK) $24.65B.

Which stock is cheaper, FTNT, UI and RBRK?

Ubiquiti (UI) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fortinet (FTNT) 41.6x, Ubiquiti (UI) 35.4x, Rubrik (RBRK) -96.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Ubiquiti (UI) is cheapest (Fortinet (FTNT) 36.1x, Ubiquiti (UI) 29.8x, Rubrik (RBRK) 224.5x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rubrik (RBRK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fortinet (FTNT) +20.2%, Ubiquiti (UI) +27.2%, Rubrik (RBRK) +42.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Ubiquiti (UI) has the highest net margin (Fortinet (FTNT) 29.0%, Ubiquiti (UI) 29.3%, Rubrik (RBRK) -16.5%). On return on invested capital, Fortinet (FTNT) leads (Fortinet (FTNT) 88.9%, Ubiquiti (UI) 72.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rubrik (RBRK) returned the most: Fortinet (FTNT) +51.8%, Ubiquiti (UI) -25.9%, Rubrik (RBRK) +63.9%. Over five years, Fortinet (FTNT) compounded fastest (Fortinet (FTNT) +13.7%/yr, Ubiquiti (UI) +12.7%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Ubiquiti (UI) 0.60%. Fortinet (FTNT) and Rubrik (RBRK) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortinet (FTNT) has been the steadiest (Fortinet (FTNT) 49.4%, Ubiquiti (UI) 54.4%, Rubrik (RBRK) 66.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTNT, UI and RBRK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.