FTNT vs RSKD vs CLBT Stock Comparison

Fortinet, Riskified and Cellebrite DI Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AXON) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$129.39 -29.7% 1M +51.8% 1Y
Market cap
$91.29B
P/E
40.0x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
7 wins
RSKD Riskified Ltd.
$8.80 +12.5% 1M +88.0% 1Y
Market cap
$1.34B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$368.15M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins
CLBT Cellebrite DI Ltd.
$12.43 +11.0% 1M -21.8% 1Y
Market cap
$3.02B
P/E
51.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$514.29M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 7 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 7, Riskified 3, Cellebrite DI 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTNTRSKDCLBTLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $91.29B $1.34B $3.02B FTNT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 40.0x -86.3x 51.4x FTNT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 36.1x 31.4x 46.0x RSKD
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +9.6% +17.8% FTNT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.0% -4.2% 11.4% FTNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 88.9% — 7.9% FTNT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.4x — -3.5x CLBT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +51.8% +88.0% -21.8% RSKD
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.7%/yr -15.0%/yr +3.5%/yr FTNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.4% 43.9% 63.5% RSKD
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 58/100 69/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

FTNTRSKDCLBT

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTNTRSKDCLBT
Valuation 61 #49 of 124 68 #40 of 124 75 #32 of 124
Growth 67 #38 of 114 81 #22 of 114 77 #27 of 114
Profitability 100 #1 of 111 56 #49 of 111 90 #12 of 111
Financial Health 57 #56 of 128 76 #32 of 128 65 #46 of 128
Shareholder Returns 67 #25 of 73 10 #66 of 73 38 #46 of 73
Overall 70 58 69
  • FTNT ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • RSKD ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • CLBT ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTNTRSKDCLBTSPY
1 month -29.7%+12.5%+11.0% -1.0%
3 months -21.2%+67.9%-20.5% -0.4%
6 months +43.8%+85.3%-5.6% +4.5%
Year to date +62.9%+77.1%-31.1% +12.4%
1 year +51.8%+88.0%-21.8% +13.6%
3 years +156.3%+119.5%+70.7% +76.4%
3 years, per year +36.9%+30.0%+19.5% +20.8%
5 years +89.6%-55.7%+18.9% +63.7%
5 years, per year +13.7%-15.0%+3.5% +10.4%
10 years +1,993.7%—— +267.7%
10 years, per year +35.6%—— +13.9%

Risk

MeasureFTNTRSKDCLBTSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.4%43.9%63.5% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.1%38.3%70.4% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.050.900.52 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.052.01-0.34 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.3%-82.5%-63.3% -25.4%
From 52-week high -33.6%-4.6%-35.5% -1.6%
52-week high $194.75$9.22$19.28 $779.14
52-week low $75.23$3.79$10.44 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTNTRSKDCLBT
P/E now vs peer median 41.6xmedian 41.0x -88.9xmedian 41.0x 51.1xmedian 41.0x
P/S now vs peer median 12.1xmedian 4.4x 3.8xmedian 4.4x 6.0xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 28.9xmedian 28.9x -529.5xmedian 28.9x 36.1xmedian 28.9x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.7xmedian 23.9x 28.8xmedian 23.9x 19.5xmedian 23.9x
P/B now vs peer median 42.3xmedian 3.1x 6.6xmedian 3.1x 5.8xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 1.47median 1.36 -2.28median 1.36 1.11median 1.36

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTNTRSKDCLBT
Revenue $7.88B $368.15M $514.29M
Gross profit $6.29B $188.72M $426.66M
Operating income $2.60B -$17.28M $55.86M
Net income $2.28B -$15.58M $58.76M
Free cash flow $3.43B $48.05M $158.73M
R&D $857.40M $69.17M $129.82M
EPS (diluted) $3.07 $-0.10 $0.24
Cash & equivalents $3.75B $105.24M $141.25M
Total debt $497.10M – $24.57M
Shares (diluted) 742.60M 157.46M 249.90M
Enterprise value $75.54B $242.07M $1.76B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTNTRSKDCLBT
P/E 41.6x -88.9x 51.1x
P/FCF 27.7x 28.8x 19.5x
P/Operating cash flow 25.8x 29.3x 19.7x
P/S 12.1x 3.8x 6.0x
P/B 42.3x 6.6x 5.8x
P/Tangible book 43.8x 6.6x 7.4x
EV/EBITDA 28.9x -529.5x 36.1x
EV/EBIT 34.9x -67.6x 50.6x
EV/Revenue 11.5x 3.2x 5.5x
EV/FCF 26.4x 24.3x 17.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.6x 24.7x 18.0x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.47 -2.28 1.11

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTNTRSKDCLBT
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 9.6% 17.8%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.1% 9.0% 20.5%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.6% 12.3% 15.8%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.7% 8.7% 20.9%
Operating income growth (1Y) 27.8% 63.9% -9.7%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.9% 42.0% 61.2%
Net income growth (1Y) 21.8% 60.4% 138.9%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 25.6% 40.2% 51.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 24.9% 57.0% 132.6%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.3% 39.0% 46.2%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 50.6% 38.6% -2.2%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 82.8% 34.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 69.2% 37.9% -0.9%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.5% 99.3% 31.9%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTNTRSKDCLBT
Gross margin 79.7% 51.3% 83.0%
EBITDA margin 39.8% -0.6% 15.2%
Operating margin 33.0% -4.7% 10.9%
Pretax margin 35.3% -2.7% 14.7%
Net margin 29.0% -4.2% 11.4%
FCF margin 43.5% 13.1% 30.9%
Operating cash flow margin 46.8% 12.9% 30.6%
Return on equity 120.1% -6.5% 11.2%
Return on assets 20.0% -4.5% 6.0%
Return on invested capital 88.9% – 7.9%
Return on capital employed 41.2% -6.3% 9.2%
Asset turnover 0.7x 1.0x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x -3.0x 2.7x
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% 12.4% 11.1%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTNTRSKDCLBT
Debt / assets 4.2% – 2.5%
Debt / equity 0.2x – 0.0x
Net debt / EBITDA -1.4x – -3.5x
Debt / FCF 0.1x – 0.2x
Liabilities / assets 81.2% 36.9% 45.9%
Equity / assets 18.8% 63.1% 54.1%
Interest coverage 175.6x – –
Current ratio 1.4x 3.6x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.2x 3.4x 1.3x
Cash ratio 0.9x 2.8x 0.8x
Altman Z-score 7.50 6.41 4.96

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTNTRSKDCLBT
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 1.0% -11.4% -0.4%
Shareholder yield 1.0% -11.4% -0.4%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTNTRSKDCLBT
Forward P/E 36.1xFY2026 31.4xFY2026 46.0xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.58FY2026 $0.28FY2026 $0.27FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +29.7%FY2026 +40.0%FY2026 -12.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +0.8% +46.4% +33.3%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.38BFY2026 $389.54MFY2026 $593.75MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.2%FY2026 +13.0%FY2026 +24.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.2% +9.8% +14.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTNTRSKDCLBT
Held by institutions 68.6% 32.7% 51.5%
Institutions holding 1,570 111 200
Change in shares held, QoQ +23.7% -3.8% -1.2%
Institutions buying 855 57 118
Institutions selling 551 25 60
Buyers to sellers 1.55 2.28 1.97

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTNTRSKDCLBT
FTNT 1.00 0.22 0.28
RSKD 0.22 1.00 0.21
CLBT 0.28 0.21 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTNT, RSKD and CLBT?

Fortinet (FTNT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fortinet (FTNT) $91.29B, Riskified (RSKD) $1.34B, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) $3.02B.

Which stock is cheaper, FTNT, RSKD and CLBT?

Fortinet (FTNT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fortinet (FTNT) 40.0x, Riskified (RSKD) -86.3x, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 51.4x). On next year's consensus earnings, Riskified (RSKD) is cheapest (Fortinet (FTNT) 36.1x, Riskified (RSKD) 31.4x, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 46.0x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Fortinet (FTNT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fortinet (FTNT) +20.2%, Riskified (RSKD) +9.6%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +17.8%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortinet (FTNT) has the highest net margin (Fortinet (FTNT) 29.0%, Riskified (RSKD) -4.2%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 11.4%). On return on invested capital, Fortinet (FTNT) leads (Fortinet (FTNT) 88.9%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 7.9%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Riskified (RSKD) returned the most: Fortinet (FTNT) +51.8%, Riskified (RSKD) +88.0%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) -21.8%. Over five years, Fortinet (FTNT) compounded fastest (Fortinet (FTNT) +13.7%/yr, Riskified (RSKD) -15.0%/yr, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) +3.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Riskified (RSKD) has been the steadiest (Fortinet (FTNT) 49.4%, Riskified (RSKD) 43.9%, Cellebrite DI (CLBT) 63.5%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTNT, RSKD and CLBT?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 7. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.