FTNT vs PANW vs NTSK Stock Comparison

Fortinet, Palo Alto Networks and Netskope Prices as of Nov 3, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (CHKP) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$128.11 -29.2% 1M +46.4% 1Y
Market cap
$94.71B
P/E
41.5x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.88B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
5 wins
PANW Palo Alto Networks Inc
$350.20 -13.2% 1M +59.7% 1Y
Market cap
$260.97B
P/E
850.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$11.48B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins
NTSK Netskope Inc
$21.84 +23.0% 1M -10.0% 1Y
Market cap
$9.19B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$802.64M
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
1 win

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 5, Palo Alto Networks 3, Netskope 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTNTPANWNTSKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $94.71B $260.97B $9.19B PANW
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 41.5x 850.1x -12.5x FTNT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.8x 80.1x — FTNT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +20.2% +24.5% +30.4% NTSK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 29.0% 2.7% -91.8% FTNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 88.9% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.4x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +46.4% +59.7% -10.0% PANW
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.6%/yr +33.6%/yr — PANW
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.4% 50.1% 78.2% FTNT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 70/100 49/100 23/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

FTNTPANWNTSK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTNTPANWNTSK
Valuation 60 #50 of 124 43 #71 of 124 13 #108 of 124
Growth 68 #37 of 114 38 #71 of 114 39 #70 of 114
Profitability 100 #1 of 111 74 #30 of 111 24 #85 of 111
Financial Health 57 #56 of 128 37 #81 of 128 30 #90 of 128
Shareholder Returns 67 #25 of 73 54 #34 of 73 11 #65 of 73
Overall 70 49 23
  • FTNT ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • PANW ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • NTSK ranked among 136 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTNTPANWNTSKSPY
1 month -29.2%-13.2%+23.0% -2.0%
3 months -23.9%-4.4%+58.3% -2.2%
6 months +42.5%+90.3%+102.8% +4.2%
Year to date +61.3%+90.1%+24.5% +10.6%
1 year +46.4%+59.7%-10.0% +10.4%
3 years +153.8%+187.6%— +73.6%
3 years, per year +36.4%+42.2%— +20.2%
5 years +89.3%+325.5%— +61.6%
5 years, per year +13.6%+33.6%— +10.1%
10 years +1,979.7%+1,342.9%— +261.3%
10 years, per year +35.5%+30.6%— +13.7%

Risk

MeasureFTNTPANWNTSKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.4%50.1%78.2% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.0%47.3%89.1% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.071.301.95 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.941.19-0.13 0.81
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.3%-36.0%-70.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -34.2%-16.6%-17.6% -3.2%
52-week high $194.75$419.91$26.52 $779.14
52-week low $75.23$141.67$7.73 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTNTPANWNTSK
P/E now vs peer median 41.2xmedian 38.8x 854.4xmedian 38.8x -12.0xmedian 38.8x
P/S now vs peer median 11.9xmedian 4.4x 24.9xmedian 4.4x 11.1xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 28.6xmedian 28.6x 131.9xmedian 28.6x -11.9xmedian 28.6x
P/FCF now vs peer median 27.4xmedian 23.6x 69.4xmedian 23.6x -127.0xmedian 23.6x
P/B now vs peer median 41.9xmedian 3.1x 10.4xmedian 3.1x 56.8xmedian 3.1x
PEG now vs peer median 1.45median 1.27 -59.04median 1.27 —median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTNTPANWNTSK
Revenue $7.88B $11.48B $802.64M
Gross profit $6.29B $8.08B $561.19M
Operating income $2.60B $695.00M -$759.79M
Net income $2.28B $307.00M -$737.16M
Free cash flow $3.43B $4.11B -$70.14M
R&D $857.40M $2.55B $575.79M
EPS (diluted) $3.07 $0.40 $-1.82
Cash & equivalents $3.75B $2.51B $220.85M
Total debt $497.10M – –
Shares (diluted) 742.60M 764.00M 405.05M
Enterprise value $78.97B $246.04B $4.70B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTNTPANWNTSK
P/E 41.2x 854.4x -12.0x
P/FCF 27.4x 69.4x -127.0x
P/Operating cash flow 25.5x 62.7x -216.8x
P/S 11.9x 24.9x 11.1x
P/B 41.9x 10.4x 56.8x
P/Tangible book 43.3x 13.9x 64.5x
EV/EBITDA 28.6x 131.9x -11.9x
EV/EBIT 34.6x 406.2x -10.3x
EV/Revenue 11.4x 24.6x 9.8x
EV/FCF 26.2x 68.6x -111.8x
EV/Operating cash flow 24.4x 62.0x -190.8x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.45 -59.04 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTNTPANWNTSK
Revenue growth (1Y) 20.2% 24.5% 30.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 15.1% 18.5% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 18.6% 19.3% 32.4%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.7% 17.5% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 27.8% -44.1% -307.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.9% 21.5% –
Net income growth (1Y) 21.8% -72.9% -132.3%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 25.6% -11.3% –
EPS growth (1Y) 24.9% -74.9% 38.0%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.3% -14.5% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 50.6% 22.5% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 17.5% 17.9% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 69.2% 18.6% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 18.5% 16.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTNTPANWNTSK
Gross margin 79.7% 70.4% 69.9%
EBITDA margin 39.8% 18.6% -82.0%
Operating margin 33.0% 6.1% -94.7%
Pretax margin 35.3% 4.7% -90.3%
Net margin 29.0% 2.7% -91.8%
FCF margin 43.5% 35.8% -8.7%
Operating cash flow margin 46.8% 39.7% -5.1%
Return on equity 120.1% 1.1% -443.7%
Return on assets 20.0% 0.6% -43.3%
Return on invested capital 88.9% – –
Return on capital employed 41.2% 1.9% -75.1%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.2x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 14.8x 0.1x
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% 15.5% 79.4%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTNTPANWNTSK
Debt / assets 4.2% – –
Debt / equity 0.2x – –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.4x – –
Debt / FCF 0.1x – –
Liabilities / assets 81.2% 43.3% 90.8%
Equity / assets 18.8% 56.7% 9.2%
Interest coverage 175.6x – –
Current ratio 1.4x 0.9x 2.0x
Quick ratio 1.2x 0.7x 1.8x
Cash ratio 0.9x 0.3x 1.5x
Altman Z-score 7.44 8.50 0.59

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTNTPANWNTSK
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 1.0% -0.1% -11.6%
Shareholder yield 1.0% -0.1% -11.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTNTPANWNTSK
Forward P/E 35.8xFY2026 80.1xFY2027 –
EPS, next fiscal year $3.58FY2026 $4.37FY2027 $-0.16FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +29.7%FY2026 +13.8%FY2027 –
EPS growth, the year after +0.8% +16.5% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.38BFY2026 $13.37BFY2027 $868.74MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.2%FY2026 +16.5%FY2027 +22.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.2% +12.7% +28.8%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTNTPANWNTSK
Held by institutions 68.6% 82.1% 45.9%
Institutions holding 1,570 2,918 204
Change in shares held, QoQ +23.7% +6.6% +31.5%
Institutions buying 855 1,549 154
Institutions selling 551 1,127 30
Buyers to sellers 1.55 1.37 5.13

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTNTPANWNTSK
FTNT 1.00 0.71 0.46
PANW 0.71 1.00 0.51
NTSK 0.46 0.51 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTNT, PANW and NTSK?

Palo Alto Networks (PANW) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fortinet (FTNT) $94.71B, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) $260.97B, Netskope (NTSK) $9.19B.

Which stock is cheaper, FTNT, PANW and NTSK?

Fortinet (FTNT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fortinet (FTNT) 41.5x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 850.1x, Netskope (NTSK) -12.5x). On next year's consensus earnings, Fortinet (FTNT) is cheapest (Fortinet (FTNT) 35.8x, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 80.1x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Netskope (NTSK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fortinet (FTNT) +20.2%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +24.5%, Netskope (NTSK) +30.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortinet (FTNT) has the highest net margin (Fortinet (FTNT) 29.0%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 2.7%, Netskope (NTSK) -91.8%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Palo Alto Networks (PANW) returned the most: Fortinet (FTNT) +46.4%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +59.7%, Netskope (NTSK) -10.0%. Over five years, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) compounded fastest (Fortinet (FTNT) +13.6%/yr, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) +33.6%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Fortinet (FTNT) has been the steadiest (Fortinet (FTNT) 49.4%, Palo Alto Networks (PANW) 50.1%, Netskope (NTSK) 78.2%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTNT, PANW and NTSK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.