FTNT vs ALRM vs RBRK Stock Comparison

Fortinet, Alarm.com Holdings and Rubrik Prices as of Nov 2, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (AXON) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FTNT Fortinet, Inc.
$126.21 -30.3% 1M +46.0% 1Y
Market cap
$92.59B
P/E
43.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.53B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
6 wins
ALRM Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.
$66.03 +20.8% 1M +34.2% 1Y
Market cap
$3.24B
P/E
27.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
3 wins
RBRK Rubrik, Inc.
$114.68 -3.3% 1M +52.4% 1Y
Market cap
$23.76B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.54B
Div. yield
–
Cybersecurity Software Technology
2 wins

Head to Head

11 decided of 12

Fortinet leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Fortinet 6, Alarm.com Holdings 3, Rubrik 2). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFTNTALRMRBRKLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $92.59B $3.24B $23.76B FTNT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 43.6x 27.6x -92.9x ALRM
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 35.3x 22.0x 216.4x ALRM
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +18.8% +8.7% +42.4% RBRK
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 28.2% 11.1% -16.5% FTNT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 111.7% 7.5% — FTNT
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA -1.2x 0.1x — FTNT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield — — — –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +46.0% +34.2% +52.4% RBRK
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +13.9%/yr -5.4%/yr — FTNT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 49.5% 30.4% 66.3% ALRM
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 71/100 70/100 54/100 FTNT

Percentile Scorecard

FTNTALRMRBRK

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFTNTALRMRBRK
Valuation 55 #56 of 124 84 #21 of 124 50 #63 of 124
Growth 63 #43 of 113 45 #63 of 113 92 #10 of 113
Profitability 100 #1 of 110 84 #18 of 110 56 #49 of 110
Financial Health 54 #60 of 129 58 #55 of 129 26 #96 of 129
Shareholder Returns 83 #12 of 67 77 #16 of 67 49 #35 of 67
Overall 71 70 54
  • FTNT ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • ALRM ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • RBRK ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFTNTALRMRBRKSPY
1 month -30.3%+20.8%-3.3% -2.3%
3 months -22.7%+18.9%+53.5% -0.7%
6 months +41.4%+39.8%+98.0% +4.8%
Year to date +58.9%+29.4%+49.9% +10.3%
1 year +46.0%+34.2%+52.4% +10.3%
3 years +150.0%+26.2%— +73.0%
3 years, per year +35.8%+8.1%— +20.1%
5 years +91.3%-24.3%— +61.9%
5 years, per year +13.9%-5.4%— +10.1%
10 years +1,929.1%+133.2%— +258.6%
10 years, per year +35.1%+8.8%— +13.6%

Risk

MeasureFTNTALRMRBRKSPY
Volatility, 1Y 49.5%30.4%66.3% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 52.0%31.0%60.7% 12.8%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.070.441.74 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 0.931.120.79 0.80
Max drawdown, 5Y -38.3%-52.9%-56.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -35.2%-0.8%-15.8% -3.5%
52-week high $194.75$66.54$136.14 $779.14
52-week low $75.23$42.13$43.81 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFTNTALRMRBRK
P/E now vs peer median 43.6xmedian 35.6x 27.6xmedian 35.6x -92.9xmedian 35.6x
P/S now vs peer median 12.3xmedian 4.2x 3.1xmedian 4.2x 15.4xmedian 4.2x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 30.0xmedian 30.0x 18.5xmedian 30.0x -185.5xmedian 30.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 29.7xmedian 25.2x 17.2xmedian 25.2x 78.2xmedian 25.2x
P/B now vs peer median 59.7xmedian 3.2x 3.7xmedian 3.2x -47.6xmedian 3.2x
PEG now vs peer median 1.50median 1.21 1.39median 1.21 —median 1.21

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFTNTALRMRBRK
Revenue $7.53B $1.06B $1.54B
Gross profit $6.04B $698.22M $1.24B
Operating income $2.44B $136.10M -$282.40M
Net income $2.12B $117.29M -$254.43M
Free cash flow $3.12B $187.71M $303.91M
R&D $846.40M $275.86M $440.96M
EPS (diluted) $2.87 $2.11 $-1.23
Cash & equivalents $2.93B $479.42M $416.17M
Total debt $496.90M $491.09M –
Shares (diluted) 739.90M 55.92M 206.10M
Enterprise value $78.52B $279.52M $16.99B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFTNTALRMRBRK
P/E 43.6x 27.6x -92.9x
P/FCF 29.7x 17.2x 78.2x
P/Operating cash flow 27.3x 16.3x 70.5x
P/S 12.3x 3.1x 15.4x
P/B 59.7x 3.7x -47.6x
P/Tangible book 62.8x 4.2x -47.6x
EV/EBITDA 30.0x 18.5x -185.5x
EV/EBIT 36.4x 23.9x -78.0x
EV/Revenue 11.8x 3.1x 14.3x
EV/FCF 28.6x 17.3x 72.4x
EV/Operating cash flow 26.2x 16.3x 65.3x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.50 1.39 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFTNTALRMRBRK
Revenue growth (1Y) 18.8% 8.7% 42.4%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 14.7% 7.3% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 17.2% 8.8% 46.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 16.6% 9.6% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 24.8% 8.3% 34.1%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 27.6% 34.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 9.3% -8.9% 42.7%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 26.0% 20.7% –
EPS growth (1Y) 14.2% -2.1% 45.8%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 29.1% 19.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 41.5% 10.4% 59.7%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 15.5% 36.7% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 53.3% 12.0% 56.6%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 16.4% 41.1% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFTNTALRMRBRK
Gross margin 80.2% 65.8% 80.2%
EBITDA margin 39.4% 16.5% -7.7%
Operating margin 32.4% 12.8% -18.3%
Pretax margin 34.8% 14.4% -14.6%
Net margin 28.2% 11.1% -16.5%
FCF margin 41.4% 17.7% 19.7%
Operating cash flow margin 45.1% 18.8% 21.9%
Return on equity 166.9% 13.6% –
Return on assets 20.4% 7.1% -9.1%
Return on invested capital 111.7% 7.5% –
Return on capital employed 44.2% 9.1% -19.8%
Asset turnover 0.7x 0.6x 0.5x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.6x 1.7x -1.3x
Stock comp / revenue 3.9% 2.9% 22.2%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFTNTALRMRBRK
Debt / assets 4.6% 29.6% –
Debt / equity 0.3x 0.6x –
Net debt / EBITDA -1.2x 0.1x –
Debt / FCF 0.2x 2.6x –
Liabilities / assets 85.7% 47.8% 117.5%
Equity / assets 14.3% 52.2% -17.5%
Interest coverage 135.7x 8.6x -65.0x
Current ratio 1.3x 5.0x 1.6x
Quick ratio 1.1x 4.0x 1.5x
Cash ratio 0.8x 3.0x 1.3x
Altman Z-score 7.51 4.31 3.23

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFTNTALRMRBRK
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield 3.0% 2.2% -0.1%
Shareholder yield 3.0% 2.2% -0.1%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFTNTALRMRBRK
Forward P/E 35.3xFY2026 22.0xFY2026 216.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $3.58FY2026 $3.00FY2026 $0.53FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +29.7%FY2026 +14.5%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +0.8% +5.7% +41.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $8.38BFY2026 $1.01BFY2026 $1.78BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +23.2%FY2026 +0.4%FY2026 +34.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +13.2% +15.2% +12.1%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFTNTALRMRBRK
Held by institutions 68.6% 98.2% 80.7%
Institutions holding 1,569 316 574
Change in shares held, QoQ +23.7% +1.4% +12.3%
Institutions buying 854 169 406
Institutions selling 551 106 116
Buyers to sellers 1.55 1.59 3.50

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FTNTALRMRBRK
FTNT 1.00 0.21 0.55
ALRM 0.21 1.00 0.35
RBRK 0.55 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FTNT, ALRM and RBRK?

Fortinet (FTNT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Fortinet (FTNT) $92.59B, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) $3.24B, Rubrik (RBRK) $23.76B.

Which stock is cheaper, FTNT, ALRM and RBRK?

Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Fortinet (FTNT) 43.6x, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 27.6x, Rubrik (RBRK) -92.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) is cheapest (Fortinet (FTNT) 35.3x, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 22.0x, Rubrik (RBRK) 216.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Rubrik (RBRK) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Fortinet (FTNT) +18.8%, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) +8.7%, Rubrik (RBRK) +42.4%.

Which company is more profitable?

Fortinet (FTNT) has the highest net margin (Fortinet (FTNT) 28.2%, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 11.1%, Rubrik (RBRK) -16.5%). On return on invested capital, Fortinet (FTNT) leads (Fortinet (FTNT) 111.7%, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 7.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Rubrik (RBRK) returned the most: Fortinet (FTNT) +46.0%, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) +34.2%, Rubrik (RBRK) +52.4%. Over five years, Fortinet (FTNT) compounded fastest (Fortinet (FTNT) +13.9%/yr, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) -5.4%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) has been the steadiest (Fortinet (FTNT) 49.5%, Alarm.com Holdings (ALRM) 30.4%, Rubrik (RBRK) 66.3%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FTNT, ALRM and RBRK?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Fortinet (FTNT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.