FSV vs UNF vs RTO Stock Comparison

FirstService, Unifirst and Rentokil Initial Prices as of Nov 5, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ROL) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FSV FirstService Corp
$153.62 +19.3% 1M -0.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.96B
P/E
60.4x
Revenue (TTM)
$5.68B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
1 win
UNF Unifirst Corp
$243.57 -3.3% 1M +60.4% 1Y
Market cap
$4.26B
P/E
38.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.52B
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
6 wins
RTO Rentokil Initial Plc /Fi
$24.08 +20.8% 1M -12.6% 1Y
Market cap
$11.93B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
—
Div. yield
–
Facility Services Industrials
2 wins

Head to Head

9 decided of 12

Unifirst leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Unifirst 6, Rentokil Initial 2, FirstService 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFSVUNFRTOLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.96B $4.26B $11.93B RTO
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 60.4x 38.9x — UNF
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.3x 30.7x 16.8x RTO
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +3.7% +3.7% — UNF
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 2.0% 4.3% — UNF
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 1.0% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 2.6x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -0.9% +60.4% -12.6% UNF
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -4.7%/yr +3.3%/yr -10.5%/yr UNF
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 31.4% 34.6% 34.8% FSV
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 39/100 44/100 — UNF

Percentile Scorecard

FSVUNFRTO

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFSVUNFRTO
Valuation 39 #70 of 114 40 #69 of 114 –
Growth 53 #47 of 98 26 #73 of 98 –
Profitability 57 #41 of 95 53 #45 of 95 –
Financial Health 41 #75 of 126 86 #18 of 126 –
Shareholder Returns 6 #67 of 71 13 #62 of 71 46 #39 of 71
Overall 39 44 –
  • FSV ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • UNF ranked among 131 companies in Business Services
  • RTO ranked among 131 companies in Business Services

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFSVUNFRTOSPY
1 month +19.3%-3.3%+20.8% -5.9%
3 months +7.6%-15.7%-1.5% -4.6%
6 months +14.2%-5.0%-28.4% +0.2%
Year to date -1.2%+26.3%-18.3% +7.5%
1 year -0.9%+60.4%-12.6% +8.2%
3 years +5.9%+44.0%-11.7% +68.3%
3 years, per year +1.9%+12.9%-4.1% +19.0%
5 years -21.6%+17.4%-42.6% +56.5%
5 years, per year -4.7%+3.3%-10.5% +9.4%
10 years +281.7%+98.8%+70.2% +251.5%
10 years, per year +14.3%+7.1%+5.5% +13.4%

Risk

MeasureFSVUNFRTOSPY
Volatility, 1Y 31.4%34.6%34.8% 13.6%
Downside volatility, 1Y 31.2%25.8%36.8% 14.2%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.590.220.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.031.75-0.36 0.60
Max drawdown, 5Y -43.8%-34.9%-54.2% -25.4%
From 52-week high -7.0%-19.2%-30.2% -5.9%
52-week high $165.10$301.48$34.52 $779.14
52-week low $125.66$150.02$19.75 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFSVUNFRTO
P/E now vs peer median 60.7xmedian 21.1x 40.3xmedian 21.1x —median 21.1x
P/S now vs peer median 1.2xmedian 0.9x 1.8xmedian 0.9x —median 0.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.6xmedian 11.7x 15.2xmedian 11.7x —median 11.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median 13.1xmedian 15.3x 62.4xmedian 15.3x —median 15.3x
P/B now vs peer median 7.5xmedian 2.3x 2.0xmedian 2.3x —median 2.3x
PEG now vs peer median 162.77median 0.88 13.97median 0.88 —median 0.88

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFSVUNFRTO
Revenue $5.68B $2.52B –
Gross profit $1.88B $922.95M –
Operating income $339.62M $136.04M –
Net income $199.45M $109.49M –
Free cash flow $536.84M $70.77M –
EPS (diluted) $2.52 $6.02 –
Cash & equivalents $160.76M $192.12M $2.47B
Total debt $1.55B – -$1.94B
Shares (diluted) 45.75M 18.20M 507.00M
Enterprise value $6.28B $3.61B $5.45B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFSVUNFRTO
P/E 60.7x 40.3x –
P/FCF 13.1x 62.4x –
P/Operating cash flow 16.8x 21.5x –
P/S 1.2x 1.8x –
P/B 7.5x 2.0x –
P/Tangible book 28.1x 2.0x –
EV/EBITDA 15.6x 15.2x –
EV/EBIT 24.8x 31.1x –
EV/Revenue 1.5x 1.7x –
EV/FCF 15.7x 59.7x –
EV/Operating cash flow 20.2x 20.6x –
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 162.77 13.97 –

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFSVUNFRTO
Revenue growth (1Y) 3.7% 3.7% –
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 9.9% 4.2% –
Gross profit growth (1Y) 2.6% 3.7% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 11.0% 7.1% –
Operating income growth (1Y) -0.6% -26.3% –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.7% 0.6% –
Net income growth (1Y) 4.7% -26.2% –
Net income CAGR (3Y) 6.0% 1.8% –
EPS growth (1Y) 12.3% -24.6% –
EPS CAGR (3Y) 0.4% 2.9% –
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 0.1% -30.9% –
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 23.1% -1.6% –
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -1.6% -50.3% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 19.6% 17.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFSVUNFRTO
Gross margin 33.1% 36.6% –
EBITDA margin 9.5% 11.0% –
Operating margin 6.0% 5.4% –
Pretax margin 4.8% 5.6% –
Net margin 2.0% 4.3% –
FCF margin 9.4% 2.8% –
Operating cash flow margin 7.4% 8.1% –
Return on equity 0.9% 4.9% –
Return on assets 5.5% 3.8% –
Return on invested capital 1.0% – –
Return on capital employed 12.7% 5.4% –
Asset turnover 1.6x 0.9x –
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 2.1x 1.9x –
Stock comp / revenue 0.4% 0.5% –

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFSVUNFRTO
Debt / assets 54.4% – -13.4%
Debt / equity 1.7x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 2.6x – –
Debt / FCF 2.9x – –
Liabilities / assets 67.2% 22.3% –
Equity / assets 32.8% 77.7% –
Interest coverage – – –
Current ratio 1.7x 3.1x -683.2x
Quick ratio 1.2x 1.6x -411.8x
Cash ratio 0.2x 0.6x -411.8x
Altman Z-score – 6.49 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFSVUNFRTO
Dividend yield 1.0% 0.6% 2.6%
Net buyback yield -8.6% 0.7% –
Shareholder yield -7.6% 1.3% 2.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFSVUNFRTO
Forward P/E 26.3xFY2026 30.7xFY2027 16.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $5.84FY2026 $7.93FY2027 $1.43FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +2.1%FY2026 -2.1%FY2027 +10.9%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +9.6% +12.2% +2.1%
Revenue, next fiscal year $5.42BFY2026 $2.80BFY2027 $7.01BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY -1.0%FY2026 +11.2%FY2027 +1.5%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +20.0% -9.3% +13.3%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFSVUNFRTO
Held by institutions 69.9% 81.3% 15.4%
Institutions holding 276 342 289
Change in shares held, QoQ +7.2% -2.5% +5.9%
Institutions buying 147 162 163
Institutions selling 101 121 90
Buyers to sellers 1.46 1.34 1.81

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FSVUNFRTO
FSV 1.00 0.17 0.27
UNF 0.17 1.00 0.33
RTO 0.27 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FSV, UNF and RTO?

Rentokil Initial (RTO) is the largest by market capitalisation: FirstService (FSV) $6.96B, Unifirst (UNF) $4.26B, Rentokil Initial (RTO) $11.93B.

Which stock is cheaper, FSV, UNF and RTO?

Unifirst (UNF) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (FirstService (FSV) 60.4x, Unifirst (UNF) 38.9x). On next year's consensus earnings, Rentokil Initial (RTO) is cheapest (FirstService (FSV) 26.3x, Unifirst (UNF) 30.7x, Rentokil Initial (RTO) 16.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Unifirst (UNF) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: FirstService (FSV) +3.7%, Unifirst (UNF) +3.7%.

Which company is more profitable?

Unifirst (UNF) has the highest net margin (FirstService (FSV) 2.0%, Unifirst (UNF) 4.3%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Unifirst (UNF) returned the most: FirstService (FSV) -0.9%, Unifirst (UNF) +60.4%, Rentokil Initial (RTO) -12.6%. Over five years, Unifirst (UNF) compounded fastest (FirstService (FSV) -4.7%/yr, Unifirst (UNF) +3.3%/yr, Rentokil Initial (RTO) -10.5%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, FirstService (FSV) has been the steadiest (FirstService (FSV) 31.4%, Unifirst (UNF) 34.6%, Rentokil Initial (RTO) 34.8%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FSV, UNF and RTO?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Unifirst (UNF) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.