FSS vs GENC vs DAN Stock Comparison

Federal Signal, Gencor Industries and Dana Prices as of Oct 28, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (ALSN) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FSS Federal Signal Corp /De/
$113.43 -1.4% 1M -9.9% 1Y
Market cap
$6.92B
P/E
24.2x
Revenue (TTM)
$2.45B
Div. yield
0.52%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
5 wins
GENC Gencor Industries Inc
$17.18 -0.8% 1M +23.3% 1Y
Market cap
$211.98M
P/E
16.9x
Revenue (TTM)
$110.01M
Div. yield
–
Heavy Equipment Industrials
1 win
DAN DANA Inc
$25.44 -6.3% 1M +27.0% 1Y
Market cap
$2.74B
P/E
2.6x
Revenue (TTM)
$7.78B
Div. yield
1.81%
Heavy Equipment Industrials
4 wins

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Federal Signal leads on 5 of the 12 questions below (Federal Signal 5, Dana 4, Gencor Industries 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFSSGENCDANLeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $6.92B $211.98M $2.74B FSS
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 24.2x 16.9x 2.6x DAN
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 23.1x 15.2x 13.4x DAN
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +24.0% -6.4% +5.1% FSS
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 11.7% 13.5% — GENC
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital 15.3% — — –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 0.8x — — –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.52% — 1.81% DAN
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months -9.9% +23.3% +27.0% DAN
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +21.5%/yr +9.0%/yr +2.8%/yr FSS
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 35.0% 38.3% 44.6% FSS
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 76/100 61/100 67/100 FSS

Percentile Scorecard

FSSGENCDAN

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFSSGENCDAN
Valuation 54 #95 of 203 69 #64 of 203 99 #4 of 203
Growth 94 #13 of 188 41 #112 of 188 76 #46 of 188
Profitability 91 #18 of 184 37 #117 of 184 75 #47 of 184
Financial Health 76 #53 of 217 100 #2 of 217 8 #199 of 217
Shareholder Returns 66 #53 of 153 – 79 #33 of 153
Overall 76 61 67
  • FSS ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • GENC ranked among 222 companies in Machinery
  • DAN ranked among 222 companies in Machinery

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFSSGENCDANSPY
1 month -1.4%-0.8%-6.3% +0.9%
3 months +1.3%+18.8%-5.1% +5.9%
6 months -6.6%+18.7%-29.0% +8.5%
Year to date +4.5%+32.6%+7.1% +13.3%
1 year -9.9%+23.3%+27.0% +12.4%
3 years +98.1%+23.0%+101.6% +88.1%
3 years, per year +25.6%+7.1%+26.3% +23.5%
5 years +165.0%+53.9%+14.6% +68.2%
5 years, per year +21.5%+9.0%+2.8% +11.0%
10 years +834.3%+46.2%+65.9% +263.4%
10 years, per year +25.0%+3.9%+5.2% +13.8%

Risk

MeasureFSSGENCDANSPY
Volatility, 1Y 35.0%38.3%44.6% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 35.9%30.0%47.0% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.280.851.28 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y -0.280.610.61 0.98
Max drawdown, 5Y -33.3%-55.7%-69.7% -25.4%
From 52-week high -15.2%-14.7%-34.7% -0.9%
52-week high $133.73$20.14$38.93 $779.14
52-week low $104.77$12.23$19.47 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFSSGENCDAN
P/E now vs peer median 24.2xmedian 25.4x 16.9xmedian 25.4x 2.6xmedian 25.4x
P/S now vs peer median 2.8xmedian 1.9x 1.9xmedian 1.9x 0.4xmedian 1.9x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 15.1xmedian 14.3x 3.2xmedian 14.3x —median 14.3x
P/FCF now vs peer median 20.4xmedian 21.8x -131.2xmedian 21.8x 20.6xmedian 21.8x
P/B now vs peer median 4.6xmedian 2.2x 0.9xmedian 2.2x 1.5xmedian 2.2x
PEG now vs peer median 0.85median 1.41 2.31median 1.41 0.02median 1.41

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFSSGENCDAN
Revenue $2.45B $110.01M $7.78B
Gross profit $714.00M $31.45M –
Operating income $395.40M $12.92M $249.00M
Net income $285.40M $14.89M $1.06B
Free cash flow $339.20M -$1.62M –
R&D – $2.73M –
EPS (diluted) $4.64 $1.02 $9.56
Cash & equivalents $62.80M $26.26M $321.00M
Total debt $453.60M – –
Shares (diluted) 61.50M 14.66M 109.50M
Enterprise value $6.67B -$391.36M $2.80B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFSSGENCDAN
P/E 24.2x 16.9x 2.6x
P/FCF 20.4x -131.2x 20.6x
P/Operating cash flow 18.6x 193.8x 6.5x
P/S 2.8x 1.9x 0.4x
P/B 4.6x 0.9x 1.5x
P/Tangible book 6.2x 0.9x 1.6x
EV/EBITDA 15.1x 3.2x –
EV/EBIT 18.5x 3.7x –
EV/Revenue 3.0x 0.4x 0.4x
EV/FCF 21.6x -29.6x –
EV/Operating cash flow 19.6x 43.7x 6.5x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 0.85 2.31 0.02

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFSSGENCDAN
Revenue growth (1Y) 24.0% -6.4% 5.1%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 16.1% 0.8% -9.8%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 24.5% -3.3% –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 22.1% 4.7% –
Operating income growth (1Y) 27.8% -16.6% 722.5%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 28.8% 2.8% -12.1%
Net income growth (1Y) 28.8% -2.0% 1,378%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 7.3% 143.1%
EPS growth (1Y) 28.4% -2.0% 2,174%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 28.6% 7.3% 149.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 45.6% 796.7% 3.4%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 59.2% 28.4% -7.9%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 49.8% -78.4% –
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 73.3% 50.4% –

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFSSGENCDAN
Gross margin 29.2% 28.6% –
EBITDA margin 19.8% 13.7% –
Operating margin 16.2% 11.7% –
Pretax margin 15.2% 17.0% –
Net margin 11.7% 13.5% –
FCF margin 13.9% -1.5% –
Operating cash flow margin 15.2% 1.0% 5.4%
Return on equity 19.4% 6.7% 56.6%
Return on assets 11.7% 6.3% 17.5%
Return on invested capital 15.3% – –
Return on capital employed 18.5% 5.7% –
Asset turnover 1.0x 0.5x 1.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.3x 0.1x 0.4x
Stock comp / revenue 0.6% – 0.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFSSGENCDAN
Debt / assets 18.6% – –
Debt / equity 0.3x – –
Net debt / EBITDA 0.8x – –
Debt / FCF 1.3x – –
Liabilities / assets 38.2% 5.9% 70.8%
Equity / assets 61.8% 94.1% 29.2%
Interest coverage 19.3x – –
Current ratio 2.7x 19.2x 1.1x
Quick ratio 1.1x 14.9x –
Cash ratio 0.2x 14.1x –
Altman Z-score 7.10 11.88 –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFSSGENCDAN
Dividend yield 0.5% – 1.8%
Net buyback yield 0.0% – –
Shareholder yield 0.5% – 1.8%
Payout ratio (earnings) 12.6% – –
Payout ratio (FCF) 10.6% – –
Dividend growth (1Y) 13.6% – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) 17.0% – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFSSGENCDAN
Forward P/E 23.1xFY2026 15.2xFY2026 13.4xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.92FY2026 $1.13FY2026 $1.90FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +16.3%FY2026 +5.6%FY2026 +413.5%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after +10.0% -15.9% +128.4%
Revenue, next fiscal year $2.79BFY2026 $111.17MFY2026 $8.05BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +28.1%FY2026 -3.7%FY2026 +7.3%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after -5.3% +38.5% +34.2%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFSSGENCDAN
Held by institutions 100.0% 48.7% 99.2%
Institutions holding 474 94 342
Change in shares held, QoQ +3.9% -2.6% +1.8%
Institutions buying 249 40 168
Institutions selling 152 33 126
Buyers to sellers 1.64 1.21 1.33

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FSSGENCDAN
FSS 1.00 0.25 0.32
GENC 0.25 1.00 0.35
DAN 0.32 0.35 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FSS, GENC and DAN?

Federal Signal (FSS) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal Signal (FSS) $6.92B, Gencor Industries (GENC) $211.98M, Dana (DAN) $2.74B.

Which stock is cheaper, FSS, GENC and DAN?

Dana (DAN) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Federal Signal (FSS) 24.2x, Gencor Industries (GENC) 16.9x, Dana (DAN) 2.6x). On next year's consensus earnings, Dana (DAN) is cheapest (Federal Signal (FSS) 23.1x, Gencor Industries (GENC) 15.2x, Dana (DAN) 13.4x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Federal Signal (FSS) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal Signal (FSS) +24.0%, Gencor Industries (GENC) -6.4%, Dana (DAN) +5.1%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gencor Industries (GENC) has the highest net margin (Federal Signal (FSS) 11.7%, Gencor Industries (GENC) 13.5%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Dana (DAN) returned the most: Federal Signal (FSS) -9.9%, Gencor Industries (GENC) +23.3%, Dana (DAN) +27.0%. Over five years, Federal Signal (FSS) compounded fastest (Federal Signal (FSS) +21.5%/yr, Gencor Industries (GENC) +9.0%/yr, Dana (DAN) +2.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Dana (DAN) has the highest dividend yield: Federal Signal (FSS) 0.52%, Dana (DAN) 1.81%. Gencor Industries (GENC) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Signal (FSS) has been the steadiest (Federal Signal (FSS) 35.0%, Gencor Industries (GENC) 38.3%, Dana (DAN) 44.6%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FSS, GENC and DAN?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Federal Signal (FSS) leads on 5. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.