FRT vs SKT vs UE Stock Comparison

Federal Realty Investment Trust, Tanger and Urban Edge Properties Prices as of Nov 4, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (BRX) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
SKT Tanger Inc.
$38.45 +11.2% 1M +14.2% 1Y
Market cap
$4.36B
P/E
17.7x
Revenue (TTM)
$612.31M
Div. yield
–
Retail REITs Real Estate
6 wins
UE Urban Edge Properties
$21.10 +8.1% 1M +10.8% 1Y
Market cap
$2.62B
P/E
25.1x
Revenue (TTM)
$494.52M
Div. yield
0.04%
Retail REITs Real Estate

Head to Head

10 decided of 12

Tanger leads on 6 of the 12 questions below (Tanger 6, Federal Realty Investment Trust 4). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFRTSKTUELeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $9.79B $4.36B $2.62B FRT
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only 22.6x 17.7x 25.1x SKT
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 26.2x 35.0x 39.8x FRT
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +7.8% +11.4% +5.5% SKT
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months 32.0% 40.3% 21.1% SKT
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — 6.0% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA 4.6x 3.1x 4.8x SKT
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.04% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +19.3% +14.2% +10.8% FRT
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years -2.9%/yr +12.5%/yr +1.8%/yr SKT
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 16.9% 21.1% 19.4% FRT
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 50/100 61/100 57/100 SKT

Percentile Scorecard

FRTSKTUE

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFRTSKTUE
Valuation 35 #96 of 146 70 #45 of 146 55 #66 of 146
Growth 60 #59 of 145 77 #34 of 145 45 #80 of 145
Profitability 85 #22 of 141 99 #3 of 141 67 #47 of 141
Financial Health 46 #79 of 146 48 #77 of 146 50 #73 of 146
Shareholder Returns 25 #102 of 136 10 #123 of 136 66 #47 of 136
Overall 50 61 57
  • FRT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • SKT ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs
  • UE ranked among 149 companies in Property REITs

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFRTSKTUESPY
1 month +8.2%+11.2%+8.1% -1.0%
3 months -5.9%-5.2%-4.2% -0.4%
6 months -1.8%+4.3%-4.3% +4.5%
Year to date +13.7%+15.2%+10.0% +12.4%
1 year +19.3%+14.2%+10.8% +13.6%
3 years +20.0%+60.7%+24.2% +76.4%
3 years, per year +6.3%+17.2%+7.5% +20.8%
5 years -13.5%+80.1%+9.1% +63.7%
5 years, per year -2.9%+12.5%+1.8% +10.4%
10 years -17.1%+16.1%-15.0% +267.7%
10 years, per year -1.9%+1.5%-1.6% +13.9%

Risk

MeasureFRTSKTUESPY
Volatility, 1Y 16.9%21.1%19.4% 12.8%
Downside volatility, 1Y 15.6%19.0%17.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 0.140.25-0.09 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.140.670.56 1.06
Max drawdown, 5Y -40.0%-36.8%-34.0% -25.4%
From 52-week high -9.8%-8.7%-11.8% -1.6%
52-week high $127.13$42.10$23.92 $779.14
52-week low $95.52$31.63$18.50 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFRTSKTUE
P/E now vs peer median 22.9xmedian 26.6x 17.9xmedian 26.6x 25.5xmedian 26.6x
P/S now vs peer median 7.3xmedian 4.3x 7.2xmedian 4.3x 5.4xmedian 4.3x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median 14.1xmedian 14.7x 12.6xmedian 14.7x 12.6xmedian 14.7x
P/FCF now vs peer median -122.9xmedian 22.1x 13.7xmedian 22.1x -40.3xmedian 22.1x
P/B now vs peer median 3.0xmedian 1.3x 6.3xmedian 1.3x 1.9xmedian 1.3x
PEG now vs peer median 1.75median 2.01 2.04median 2.01 0.76median 2.01

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFRTSKTUE
Revenue $1.35B $612.31M $494.52M
Operating income $645.16M – –
Net income $451.22M $246.96M $108.79M
Free cash flow -$80.51M $323.28M -$65.89M
EPS (diluted) $5.00 $2.13 $0.79
Cash & equivalents $109.73M $176.88M $62.64M
Total debt $4.88B $1.62B $1.70B
Shares (diluted) 86.56M 115.73M 131.53M
Enterprise value $9.35B $3.91B $2.40B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFRTSKTUE
P/E 22.9x 17.9x 25.5x
P/FCF -122.9x 13.7x -40.3x
P/Operating cash flow 15.2x 7.4x 12.0x
P/S 7.3x 7.2x 5.4x
P/B 3.0x 6.3x 1.9x
P/Tangible book 3.0x 6.3x 2.0x
EV/EBITDA 14.1x 12.6x 12.6x
EV/EBIT 22.7x 19.8x 22.7x
EV/Revenue 10.8x 9.5x 8.7x
EV/FCF -182.2x 18.1x -65.2x
EV/Operating cash flow 22.5x 9.8x 19.4x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) 1.75 2.04 0.76

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFRTSKTUE
Revenue growth (1Y) 7.8% 11.4% 5.5%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 6.5% 11.0% 7.2%
Gross profit growth (1Y) – – –
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) – – –
Operating income growth (1Y) 21.5% – –
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 12.5% – –
Net income growth (1Y) 25.6% 21.3% -6.4%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 14.9% 12.0% 37.0%
EPS growth (1Y) 26.8% 19.5% -10.2%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 13.1% 8.8% 33.3%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 9.2% 10.4% 20.6%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 5.8% 10.9% 15.6%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) -24.2% 63.7% -1,214%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) -39.4% 10.6% -83.1%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFRTSKTUE
Gross margin – – –
EBITDA margin 77.1% 75.4% 69.0%
Operating margin 47.7% – –
Pretax margin 33.3% 36.4% 22.6%
Net margin 32.0% 40.3% 21.1%
FCF margin -6.0% 52.8% -13.3%
Operating cash flow margin 48.2% 97.5% 44.9%
Return on equity 13.4% 18.9% 7.8%
Return on assets 5.0% 4.6% 3.2%
Return on invested capital – – 6.0%
Return on capital employed – – –
Asset turnover 0.1x 0.2x 0.1x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) 1.4x 2.4x 2.0x
Stock comp / revenue 1.1% 4.3% 2.5%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFRTSKTUE
Debt / assets 53.7% 56.6% 49.8%
Debt / equity 1.5x 2.3x 1.2x
Net debt / EBITDA 4.6x 3.1x 4.8x
Debt / FCF -60.7x 5.0x -25.9x
Liabilities / assets 63.5% 75.5% 58.8%
Equity / assets 36.5% 24.5% 41.2%
Interest coverage 3.3x 4.1x 2.4x
Current ratio – – –
Quick ratio – – –
Cash ratio – – –
Altman Z-score – – –

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFRTSKTUE
Dividend yield 4.0% 3.2% 3.9%
Net buyback yield -0.6% -1.1% 0.0%
Shareholder yield 3.4% 2.1% 3.9%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – 95.0%
Payout ratio (FCF) – – -156.8%
Dividend growth (1Y) – – 11.2%
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – 11.2%

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFRTSKTUE
Forward P/E 26.2xFY2026 35.0xFY2026 39.8xFY2026
EPS, next fiscal year $4.38FY2026 $1.10FY2026 $0.53FY2026
EPS growth, next FY -6.4%FY2026 +11.1%FY2026 +51.4%FY2026
EPS growth, the year after -31.5% +10.0% -7.5%
Revenue, next fiscal year $1.28BFY2026 $638.63MFY2026 $458.01MFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +2.5%FY2026 +15.9%FY2026 -2.7%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +14.8% -9.1% +3.7%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFRTSKTUE
Held by institutions 98.5% 93.8% 97.1%
Institutions holding 623 362 273
Change in shares held, QoQ +9.4% +2.8% -2.1%
Institutions buying 365 173 146
Institutions selling 162 122 78
Buyers to sellers 2.25 1.42 1.87

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FRTSKTUE
FRT 1.00 0.66 0.70
SKT 0.66 1.00 0.65
UE 0.70 0.65 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FRT, SKT and UE?

Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is the largest by market capitalisation: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) $9.79B, Tanger (SKT) $4.36B, Urban Edge Properties (UE) $2.62B.

Which stock is cheaper, FRT, SKT and UE?

Tanger (SKT) trades on the lowest price-to-earnings ratio (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 22.6x, Tanger (SKT) 17.7x, Urban Edge Properties (UE) 25.1x). On next year's consensus earnings, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) is cheapest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 26.2x, Tanger (SKT) 35.0x, Urban Edge Properties (UE) 39.8x). A lower multiple can reflect slower expected growth, so read it next to the growth figures.

Which company is growing faster?

Tanger (SKT) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +7.8%, Tanger (SKT) +11.4%, Urban Edge Properties (UE) +5.5%.

Which company is more profitable?

Tanger (SKT) has the highest net margin (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 32.0%, Tanger (SKT) 40.3%, Urban Edge Properties (UE) 21.1%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) returned the most: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) +19.3%, Tanger (SKT) +14.2%, Urban Edge Properties (UE) +10.8%. Over five years, Tanger (SKT) compounded fastest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) -2.9%/yr, Tanger (SKT) +12.5%/yr, Urban Edge Properties (UE) +1.8%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which pays a higher dividend?

Only one of these companies pays a dividend: Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 0.00%, Tanger (SKT) 0.00%, Urban Edge Properties (UE) 0.04%. Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) and Tanger (SKT) pays no regular dividend.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) has been the steadiest (Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT) 16.9%, Tanger (SKT) 21.1%, Urban Edge Properties (UE) 19.4%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FRT, SKT and UE?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Tanger (SKT) leads on 6. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.