FROG vs GTLB vs U Stock Comparison

JFrog, Gitlab and Unity Software Prices as of Oct 23, 2026 Peers: Industry group
1 more company in this comparison (MNDY) Create a free account to keep reading and compare up to 10 companies.
FROG JFrog Ltd
$100.62 +9.0% 1M +108.3% 1Y
Market cap
$12.15B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$599.96M
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
3 wins
GTLB Gitlab Inc.
$56.28 +14.8% 1M +17.0% 1Y
Market cap
$9.49B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$1.06B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
4 wins
U Unity Software Inc.
$40.79 -7.5% 1M +12.4% 1Y
Market cap
$17.71B
P/E
–
Revenue (TTM)
$2.03B
Div. yield
–
Developer Tools Technology
1 win

Head to Head

8 decided of 12

Gitlab leads on 4 of the 12 questions below (Gitlab 4, JFrog 3, Unity Software 1). Which ones matter depends on what you are buying for; a cheap multiple and slow growth often come together.

QuestionFROGGTLBULeader
Larger companyMarket capitalisation $12.15B $9.49B $17.71B U
Cheaper on earningsLower P/E, profitable companies only -275.7x -180.1x -30.1x –
Cheaper on forward earningsLower price / next fiscal year consensus EPS 107.0x 62.5x — GTLB
Faster revenue growthRevenue growth, trailing twelve months +26.4% +23.0% +14.0% FROG
More profitableNet margin, trailing twelve months -7.3% -5.0% -29.0% GTLB
Better return on capitalReturn on invested capital — — -17.2% –
Less leveragedLower net debt / EBITDA — — 13.2x –
Higher dividend yieldTrailing dividend yield 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% –
Better 1-year returnPrice return, last 12 months +108.3% +17.0% +12.4% FROG
Better 5-year returnAnnualised price return, 5 years +23.4%/yr -14.1%/yr -22.3%/yr FROG
Less volatileAnnualised volatility, 1 year 75.1% 59.6% 75.1% GTLB
Higher overall scoreMean of the five percentile scores vs peers 59/100 67/100 47/100 GTLB

Percentile Scorecard

FROGGTLBU

Each axis is the mean percentile of its metrics against the company's industry group. 100 is the best in the group, 50 the middle.

Scores by Axis

AxisFROGGTLBU
Valuation 41 #74 of 124 52 #60 of 124 60 #50 of 124
Growth 80 #23 of 113 83 #20 of 113 41 #67 of 113
Profitability 57 #48 of 110 62 #42 of 110 49 #57 of 110
Financial Health 72 #37 of 129 69 #41 of 129 50 #65 of 129
Shareholder Returns 45 #38 of 68 70 #21 of 68 36 #44 of 68
Overall 59 67 47
  • FROG ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • GTLB ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software
  • U ranked among 137 companies in Infrastructure Software

Price Performance

Price return, split-adjusted, before dividends. Click a name to hide or show it.

Returns

PeriodFROGGTLBUSPY
1 month +9.0%+14.8%-7.5% -1.0%
3 months +25.5%+79.9%+42.6% +2.9%
6 months +122.4%+161.6%+56.8% +6.4%
Year to date +61.1%+50.0%-7.7% +11.4%
1 year +108.3%+17.0%+12.4% +13.1%
3 years +337.1%+22.7%+48.6% +79.4%
3 years, per year +63.6%+7.1%+14.1% +21.5%
5 years +185.4%-53.1%-71.6% +67.7%
5 years, per year +23.4%-14.1%-22.3% +10.9%

Risk

MeasureFROGGTLBUSPY
Volatility, 1Y 75.1%59.6%75.1% 12.7%
Downside volatility, 1Y 71.7%59.6%82.6% 12.7%
Beta vs S&P 500, 1Y 1.400.912.22 1.00
Return / volatility, 1Y 1.440.280.17 1.03
Max drawdown, 5Y -56.6%-85.2%-93.1% -25.4%
From 52-week high -3.3%0.0%-17.5% -2.5%
52-week high $104.03$56.28$49.47 $779.14
52-week low $34.75$19.42$17.13 $631.97

Valuation History

Weekly multiples on trailing twelve-month fundamentals. Negative or extreme readings (a loss year, a collapsed denominator) are left out so the chart stays readable.

MultipleFROGGTLBU
P/E now vs peer median -278.1xmedian 37.4x -180.2xmedian 37.4x -30.4xmedian 37.4x
P/S now vs peer median 20.6xmedian 4.4x 8.9xmedian 4.4x 8.8xmedian 4.4x
EV/EBITDA now vs peer median -247.2xmedian 35.0x -306.5xmedian 35.0x -119.2xmedian 35.0x
P/FCF now vs peer median 73.0xmedian 27.2x 43.8xmedian 27.2x 33.3xmedian 27.2x
P/B now vs peer median 12.9xmedian 3.4x 9.6xmedian 3.4x 5.9xmedian 3.4x
PEG now vs peer median -11.81median 1.27 -4.89median 1.27 -1.55median 1.27

Financial History

Reported figures by fiscal period, placed on the calendar year (or quarter) each period ended in, so companies with different fiscal years line up.

Trailing twelve monthsFROGGTLBU
Revenue $599.96M $1.06B $2.03B
Gross profit $467.14M $904.84M $1.32B
Operating income -$69.09M -$90.20M -$616.00M
Net income -$44.07M -$54.73M -$588.01M
Free cash flow $169.70M $213.67M $538.39M
R&D $210.17M $304.14M $1.03B
EPS (diluted) $-0.36 $-0.31 $-1.34
Cash & equivalents $96.69M $226.49M $2.35B
Total debt – – $1.67B
Shares (diluted) 121.82M 168.70M 437.90M
Enterprise value $9.23B $4.41B $9.27B

All Metrics

58 metrics · best in bold

Bold marks the best reading: the lowest positive value for multiples, leverage and payout, the highest for everything else. The bar under each value is its percentile against that company's own peers. Hover a value for its rank and the peer median.

Valuation

12 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBU
P/E -278.1x -180.2x -30.4x
P/FCF 73.0x 43.8x 33.3x
P/Operating cash flow 70.2x 41.9x 32.4x
P/S 20.6x 8.9x 8.8x
P/B 12.9x 9.6x 5.9x
P/Tangible book 13.3x 9.7x 6.2x
EV/EBITDA -247.2x -306.5x -119.2x
EV/EBIT -167.3x -89.7x -26.2x
EV/Revenue 19.3x 7.7x 8.0x
EV/FCF 68.1x 37.9x 30.0x
EV/Operating cash flow 65.6x 36.3x 29.2x
PEG (3Y EPS CAGR) -11.81 -4.89 -1.55

Growth

14 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBU
Revenue growth (1Y) 26.4% 23.0% 14.0%
Revenue CAGR (3Y) 24.3% 28.1% 3.9%
Gross profit growth (1Y) 30.3% 19.1% -0.6%
Gross profit CAGR (3Y) 24.4% 26.7% 2.1%
Operating income growth (1Y) 33.7% 10.7% -23.8%
Operating income CAGR (3Y) 8.6% 25.2% 13.7%
Net income growth (1Y) 48.9% -405.1% -35.5%
Net income CAGR (3Y) 19.0% 34.8% 15.8%
EPS growth (1Y) 51.7% -470.3% -29.1%
EPS CAGR (3Y) 23.5% 36.9% 19.7%
Operating cash flow growth (1Y) 24.4% 433.4% 45.5%
Operating cash flow CAGR (3Y) 84.6% 310.4% 110.7%
Free cash flow growth (1Y) 22.3% 496.3% 51.7%
Free cash flow CAGR (3Y) 89.2% 1,057% 83.0%

Profitability

14 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBU
Gross margin 77.9% 85.8% 64.9%
EBITDA margin -7.8% -2.5% -6.7%
Operating margin -11.5% -8.5% -30.4%
Pretax margin -6.8% -4.7% -29.0%
Net margin -7.3% -5.0% -29.0%
FCF margin 28.3% 20.3% 26.5%
Operating cash flow margin 29.4% 21.2% 27.3%
Return on equity -4.7% -5.4% -19.5%
Return on assets -3.1% -3.2% -8.9%
Return on invested capital – – -17.2%
Return on capital employed -7.2% -8.8% -12.3%
Asset turnover 0.4x 0.6x 0.3x
Cash conversion (OCF / net income) -4.0x -4.1x -0.9x
Stock comp / revenue 26.8% 21.8% 16.9%

Financial Health

11 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBU
Debt / assets – – 8.4%
Debt / equity – – 0.2x
Net debt / EBITDA – – 13.2x
Debt / FCF – – 1.0x
Liabilities / assets 35.5% 41.5% 54.4%
Equity / assets 64.5% 58.5% 45.6%
Interest coverage – – -25.5x
Current ratio 2.1x 2.4x 2.0x
Quick ratio 2.0x 2.3x 1.9x
Cash ratio 1.7x 1.9x 1.5x
Altman Z-score 14.32 8.19 2.32

Shareholder Returns

7 metrics
MetricFROGGTLBU
Dividend yield – – –
Net buyback yield -0.2% 1.3% -0.6%
Shareholder yield -0.2% 1.3% -0.6%
Payout ratio (earnings) – – –
Payout ratio (FCF) – – –
Dividend growth (1Y) – – –
Dividend CAGR (3Y) – – –

Analyst Estimates

Solid lines are reported fiscal-year results; dashed lines are the consensus for the years ahead. Hover a year for the analysts' high and low, and how each result compared with its estimate.

ConsensusFROGGTLBU
Forward P/E 107.0xFY2026 62.5xFY2026 –
EPS, next fiscal year $0.94FY2026 $0.90FY2026 $-0.70FY2026
EPS growth, next FY +14.6%FY2026 -6.2%FY2026 –
EPS growth, the year after +16.0% +21.1% –
Revenue, next fiscal year $669.80MFY2026 $1.08BFY2026 $2.12BFY2026
Revenue growth, next FY +25.9%FY2026 +12.6%FY2026 +14.8%FY2026
Revenue growth, the year after +10.1% +16.3% +31.5%

Institutional Ownership

13F filings, quarter ended Jun 30, 2026
HoldersFROGGTLBU
Held by institutions 92.7% 95.7% 84.7%
Institutions holding 409 396 558
Change in shares held, QoQ +11.1% +4.9% +8.0%
Institutions buying 252 231 306
Institutions selling 116 121 161
Buyers to sellers 2.17 1.91 1.90

Return Correlation

Daily returns, last 12 months

1.00 means two stocks move in lockstep, 0 that they move independently. Pairs below about 0.5 diversify each other.

FROGGTLBU
FROG 1.00 0.50 0.28
GTLB 0.50 1.00 0.33
U 0.28 0.33 1.00

Add a Peer

Largest companies in the same industry

Related Comparisons

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is bigger, FROG, GTLB and U?

Unity Software (U) is the largest by market capitalisation: JFrog (FROG) $12.15B, Gitlab (GTLB) $9.49B, Unity Software (U) $17.71B.

Which company is growing faster?

JFrog (FROG) grew revenue fastest over the trailing twelve months: JFrog (FROG) +26.4%, Gitlab (GTLB) +23.0%, Unity Software (U) +14.0%.

Which company is more profitable?

Gitlab (GTLB) has the highest net margin (JFrog (FROG) -7.3%, Gitlab (GTLB) -5.0%, Unity Software (U) -29.0%).

Which stock has performed better?

Over the past year JFrog (FROG) returned the most: JFrog (FROG) +108.3%, Gitlab (GTLB) +17.0%, Unity Software (U) +12.4%. Over five years, JFrog (FROG) compounded fastest (JFrog (FROG) +23.4%/yr, Gitlab (GTLB) -14.1%/yr, Unity Software (U) -22.3%/yr). Returns are price only, before dividends.

Which stock is riskier?

By one-year price volatility, Gitlab (GTLB) has been the steadiest (JFrog (FROG) 75.1%, Gitlab (GTLB) 59.6%, Unity Software (U) 75.1%). Volatility measures how widely the price swings, not the risk of the business.

Which is the better stock, FROG, GTLB and U?

There is no single answer; it depends on what you are buying for. On the 12 head-to-head measures on this page, Gitlab (GTLB) leads on 4. Business Quant does not give investment advice; use the comparison as a starting point for your own research.

Data from SEC filings, exchange prices and consensus estimates, via Business Quant. Percentile scores compare each company with its own peer group, so two companies' scores are each relative to different peers unless you rank against the whole market. Price returns exclude dividends. Nothing on this page is investment advice.